Page 1 of 5
St. Cloud Tech at Little Falls
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:25 pm
by Mite-dad
Predictions?
I'm going 5-2 Flyers.
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:30 pm
by darkdemon
Tech is a good team but they sometimes show up to play and other times don't
LF 4
Tech 2
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:31 pm
by Goldy Gopher
Tiggers 2
Airplanes 3
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:39 pm
by ap4mvp
LF is undefeated in there last 30 games or close to it at the Exchange

I Like LF on senior night
LF 6
TECH 2
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 6:18 pm
by PASTRAPIDSFAN
LF by 3
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 6:38 pm
by NewHotness
Tech plays very physical. LF by 1
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 6:54 pm
by joester
Lil Falls shows there ready for sections.
LF-7
Tech-2
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:22 pm
by STC18
Tech comes out to play tonight. LF wins through 4-3 in a good game.
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:35 pm
by Mite-dad
At the end of 1 period - LF - 4 StCTech - 1
At the end of 2 periods StCTech - 6 LF - 5.
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:59 pm
by Mite-dad
Little Falls comes back and scores with a minute left to go ahead in the third. Then gets an empty netter. Final 9-7 LF.
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:15 pm
by RLStars
Mite-dad wrote:Little Falls comes back and scores with a minute left to go ahead in the third. Then gets an empty netter. Final 9-7 LF.
Who was in net for Tech and for how long?
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:21 pm
by ap4mvp
RLStars wrote:Mite-dad wrote:Little Falls comes back and scores with a minute left to go ahead in the third. Then gets an empty netter. Final 9-7 LF.
Who was in net for Tech and for how long?
#40 was in net for tech and man did he stink the place up
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:28 pm
by HighinFly
sounds like the floaters just about choked down a good one...4 to 1 after one and then down 6-5 after two and then the floaters win 9-7, was this just a lack of goaltending, defense, or both? the flyers better now play like this is sections or i could see an early upset
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:31 pm
by flameofshame69
This game was horably officated

I hate the floaters and want to see them lose but the officals should never decide a game like they almost did tonite

I finally have to give the floaters a little respect for over coming bias officating but not much, so get off my back ap and demon.
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:41 pm
by ap4mvp
flameofshame69 wrote:This game was horably officated

I hate the floaters and want to see them lose but the officals should never decide a game like they almost did tonite

I finally have to give the floaters a little respect for over coming bias officating but not much, so get off my back ap and demon.
Glad to see we agree on one thing flamejob. Yeah these officals were bad but the best team always finds a way to win. Number 4 for tech should have been kicked out

What a cheap player, I would say he might over take Gaffke of Fergus after tonights game as the cheapest player in the CLC.
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:08 pm
by zippitydoda
Number 4 for Tech is CHEAP? Because he sprayed the goalie going to the net? Gimmie a break. He plays the game hard and likes to do some jawing, but I saw a number of Flyers flapping their gums as well. I believe he had one penalty, maybe two. How does that constitute cheap?
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:12 pm
by darkdemon
The best team always finds a way to win. Spearl didn't look too great between the pipes tonight and the terrible officiating didn't help too much either. Coach Couture still looked upset after the win but i don't blame him after giving up a 3 goal lead. This game does show me one thing LF can win in the high scoring games as well as the low scoring games such as the alex game. I doubt that any 6A team could score 5 goals in one period against little falls. Tech has played some tough teams and played them well. All i have to say is good luck who has these guys in sections it isn't gonna be an easy game for any team.

Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:18 pm
by ap4mvp
zippitydoda wrote:Number 4 for Tech is CHEAP? Because he sprayed the goalie going to the net? Gimmie a break. He plays the game hard and likes to do some jawing, but I saw a number of Flyers flapping their gums as well. I believe he had one penalty, maybe two. How does that constitute cheap?
It wouldn't be cheap but number 4 did it well after the whistle blew

Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:42 pm
by Jacketfan06
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:59 am
by BlueGoose5
I hate to say it, but this is yet another loss by Tech to a Class A team. This shouldn't happen to Tech Hockey, especially since they're on record saying that Class A teams don't belong on the same ice as them.
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:04 am
by ap4mvp
BlueGoose5 wrote:I hate to say it, but this is yet another loss by Tech to a Class A team. This shouldn't happen to Tech Hockey, especially since they're on record saying that Class A teams don't belong on the same ice as them.
The better team won, period. I was thinking tech dosen't deserve to be on the same ice with a lot of Class A teams

Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:23 am
by Blue&Gold
ap4mvp wrote:BlueGoose5 wrote:I hate to say it, but this is yet another loss by Tech to a Class A team. This shouldn't happen to Tech Hockey, especially since they're on record saying that Class A teams don't belong on the same ice as them.
The better team won, period. I was thinking tech dosen't deserve to be on the same ice with a lot of Class A teams


I've probably said enough.....
No I haven't! CLASSIC!!!

Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:34 am
by BlueGoose5
The one good thing for the Tech players last night is that there are too few stairs at Exchange Arena for running.
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 10:07 am
by Goldy Gopher
If Little Falls needs to score 9 goals to beat Tech I don't think they're going to make it too far in the post season.
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 10:26 am
by ap4mvp
Is the goalie for tech #40 a freshman

If he is that boy needs to go back to bantams, a lot of soft goals last night. I can't believe the tech coach didn't pull him after the 1st period
