NTDP residency requirement
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:54 pm
I know there is another thread on Nick Mattson's StarTribune coverage and also one on Nick Leddy, but I am hoping this question is seen by everyone in hopes that someone posts the actual answer, not just what they think or what they'd do if in charge.
Q: If a Minnesota HS player (required so this doesn't violate the forum category!) is invited to play with the NTDP in Ann Arbor, can the family just move there for the two years instead of making arrangements with the gracious host family?
I see the Greiner kid from California shows a Faribault address, so I think his family may have moved for hockey. When I was a senior in HS the team had three Californians - all of whom were town residents.
On one hand it seems like the people in charge of NTDP are trying to make sure kids have to leave their past behind, almost as a way to test their commitment. On the other hand I've seen a kid from NTDP with an Ann Arbor address so I believe they've selected a hometown player before.
I could conceivably live anywhere for my job and many other people could easily relocate to find work. Since the costs of this deal are picked up by USA Hockey, many families could justify relocating for 21 months.
This may defeat USA Hockey's goal. Some have mentioned a Soviet approach. I liken what I'm reading to the military where they want to break you down first. Not for me, but I wasn't for them either!! The kids in question are very advanced hockey-wise. Whether hockey or anything else, nobody is ever really sure how to best handle prodigies.
[/b]
Q: If a Minnesota HS player (required so this doesn't violate the forum category!) is invited to play with the NTDP in Ann Arbor, can the family just move there for the two years instead of making arrangements with the gracious host family?
I see the Greiner kid from California shows a Faribault address, so I think his family may have moved for hockey. When I was a senior in HS the team had three Californians - all of whom were town residents.
On one hand it seems like the people in charge of NTDP are trying to make sure kids have to leave their past behind, almost as a way to test their commitment. On the other hand I've seen a kid from NTDP with an Ann Arbor address so I believe they've selected a hometown player before.
I could conceivably live anywhere for my job and many other people could easily relocate to find work. Since the costs of this deal are picked up by USA Hockey, many families could justify relocating for 21 months.
This may defeat USA Hockey's goal. Some have mentioned a Soviet approach. I liken what I'm reading to the military where they want to break you down first. Not for me, but I wasn't for them either!! The kids in question are very advanced hockey-wise. Whether hockey or anything else, nobody is ever really sure how to best handle prodigies.
[/b]