HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Posted: **Sat Apr 12, 2008 11:42 am**

section 7 beat section 1 5 to 4 today

Posted: **Sat Apr 12, 2008 12:59 pm**

5A/AA 6-4 over 8A/AA.

Posted: **Sat Apr 12, 2008 2:16 pm**

Who won the section 3 vs. 6 game last night and what was the score?

Posted: **Sat Apr 12, 2008 4:35 pm**

Tony Soprano wrote:Who won the section 3 vs. 6 game last night and what was the score?

4-2 section 6 won

Posted: **Sat Apr 12, 2008 5:15 pm**

Section 3 beat 2 today, 6-3 I believe.

Posted: **Sat Apr 12, 2008 9:51 pm**

Section 4 beat section 6 6 to 4. Who won between section 5 and 7? Who will win it all?

Posted: **Sat Apr 12, 2008 9:56 pm**

Tony Soprano wrote:Who won between section 5 and 7?

Section Five 1, Section Seven 0

Very entertaining

Posted: **Sun Apr 13, 2008 9:52 am**

any updates on scoring in each section

Posted: **Sun Apr 13, 2008 10:27 am**

Debruzzi and Bjugstad each have 2 for section 5

Posted: **Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:03 pm**

Section 5 wins...I think the score was 6-3

Posted: **Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:00 am**

Final 54 Roster for 16's

http://www.minnesotahockey.org/assorted ... l%2054.pdf

Posted: **Tue Apr 15, 2008 3:26 pm**

How did goalie Austin Eakman get left off the final 54, he only gave up 3 goals in the tourney for the 5A/AA team that won it, and I believe the other goalie gave up about a 1/2 dozen and he was selected?? was it the strength of the opponents they faced or what?

Posted: **Tue Apr 15, 2008 3:52 pm**

Don't know what Eakman did in the first two games, but in the championship game the other goalie for 5A/AA Larsen played out of his mind in the first half. The shots were something like 25 to 6 and section 4 was only up 2 - 1 I know shots are not everything, but the Larsen kid played pretty good with a lot of offensive zone pressure.

Like I said, not sure what happened in the first two games.

Posted: **Tue Apr 15, 2008 3:52 pm**

Can't Never Tried wrote:How did goalie Austin Eakman get left off the final 54, he only gave up 3 goals in the tourney for the 5A/AA team that won it, and I believe the other goalie gave up about a 1/2 dozen and he was selected?? was it the strength of the opponents they faced or what?

Typical whiner!

They got it right...

Posted: **Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:02 pm**

Neutron 14 wrote:
Can't Never Tried wrote:How did goalie Austin Eakman get left off the final 54, he only gave up 3 goals in the tourney for the 5A/AA team that won it, and I believe the other goalie gave up about a 1/2 dozen and he was selected?? was it the strength of the opponents they faced or what?
Typical whiner! They got it right...

That's right I forgot it is a future Aus player!

Posted: **Tue Apr 15, 2008 5:38 pm**

NO $%&*^$#! just the goalie that has 4 state chamionshipgames under his belt...I am sorry Rogers boy it has nothing to do with his future coach how about his phenomenal play.

Neutron has the knowledge...

Posted: **Tue Apr 15, 2008 5:55 pm**

Fire and Ice wrote:NO $%&*^$#! just the goalie that has 4 state chamionshipgames under his belt...I am sorry Rogers boy it has nothing to do with his future coach how about his phenomenal play.

Neutron has the knowledge...

No need for a melt down there F & I

I asked a legit question based on player results in the tourney !
Not what he did in youth hockey.
The other sarcasm was for Neut and he knows it...Now about that knowledge part Neut

Posted: **Tue Apr 15, 2008 6:02 pm**

No melt down...they made a good choice.

By the way is youth hockey some secondary event? It is where all the powerful build their programs. Like the Emerald City, the Lost City, Condom Country

and so on

Posted: **Tue Apr 15, 2008 6:08 pm**

Fire and Ice wrote:No melt down...they made a good choice.

By the way is youth hockey some secondary event? It is where all the powerful build their programs. Like the Emerald City, the Lost City, Condom Country and so on

Didn't say it was...again based on the results of the tourney is why I asked the question.
I have no reason to care if either got in other then being a Rogers guy!

I'm sure Larson is a great goalie and will do just fine.

You forgot Hill Murray

Posted: **Tue Apr 15, 2008 6:11 pm**

Hill Murray??? please explain

Posted: **Tue Apr 15, 2008 6:15 pm**

Fire and Ice wrote:Hill Murray??? please explain

Seriously ?

How's their youth program doing?

Posted: **Tue Apr 15, 2008 6:23 pm**

Can't Never Tried wrote:
Fire and Ice wrote:Hill Murray??? please explain
Seriously ? How's their youth program doing?

Quite well from what I hear

Posted: **Wed Apr 16, 2008 8:12 am**

Can't Never Tried wrote:Now about that knowledge part Neut

Posted: **Wed Apr 16, 2008 9:30 am**

Neutron 14 wrote:
Can't Never Tried wrote:Now about that knowledge part Neut

Nice

Posted: **Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:58 am**

Can't Never Tried wrote:
Fire and Ice wrote:No melt down...they made a good choice.

By the way is youth hockey some secondary event? It is where all the powerful build their programs. Like the Emerald City, the Lost City, Condom Country and so on
Didn't say it was...again based on the results of the tourney is why I asked the question.
I have no reason to care if either got in other then being a Rogers guy!
I'm sure Larson is a great goalie and will do just fine.

You forgot Hill Murray

I feel sorry for the Rogers kid. I mean what chance does he really have to get to the next level? All season long he only sees quality shots during games. The Lost City kids see them everyday in practice...

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Select 16 tourney

Select 16 tourney

CRY NO MORE

Re: CRY NO MORE

Re: CRY NO MORE

Re: CRY NO MORE