WI Transfer Rule in Legal Dispute
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:40 pm
Something interesting is happening in WI HS athletics that could set a nationwide precedent and cause changes in the transfer rules.
Wisconsin currently employs a transfer rule similar to MN's - if a student transfers (in every scenario - public to public, public to private, private to private) he must sit out a full season before becoming eligible to compete.(There are some technical points and loop holes here that I won't mention) Here's the situation under dispute: A golfer transferred after his soph year to another school where he was declared ineligible. The parents sued the WIAA (high school league) claiming that because junior year performance is so important for athletic scholarships, the WIAA's transfer rule deprives the student of some basic civil rights. The WI Court hearing the case claims they need time to research the rule and that for now, the transfer student has been granted a "stay" of some kind (sorry, I don't know the legal terminology) and will compete for his new school during the golf season. Should the WI court decide to invalidate the rule, this could mean future law suits for other states with similar rules. Could mean the end to transfer regulations altogether.
Comments? Any lawyers and or Constitutional law students want to lend some insight here?
Wisconsin currently employs a transfer rule similar to MN's - if a student transfers (in every scenario - public to public, public to private, private to private) he must sit out a full season before becoming eligible to compete.(There are some technical points and loop holes here that I won't mention) Here's the situation under dispute: A golfer transferred after his soph year to another school where he was declared ineligible. The parents sued the WIAA (high school league) claiming that because junior year performance is so important for athletic scholarships, the WIAA's transfer rule deprives the student of some basic civil rights. The WI Court hearing the case claims they need time to research the rule and that for now, the transfer student has been granted a "stay" of some kind (sorry, I don't know the legal terminology) and will compete for his new school during the golf season. Should the WI court decide to invalidate the rule, this could mean future law suits for other states with similar rules. Could mean the end to transfer regulations altogether.
Comments? Any lawyers and or Constitutional law students want to lend some insight here?