Page 1 of 1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:19 pm
by sinbin006
The new owners of the Lightning said they would be aggressive, and they have been. They have agreed to terms with former Pittsburgh Penguin Ryan Malone and have also picked up Brian Rolston from the Minnesota Wild for a conditional draft pick in 2009 or 2010.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/news/story?id=3466760

Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:03 am
by Stealth
I was hoping the WILD would give him some attention. :(

Starting to feel like we the team of 18,000 which I’m sick of ImageImage are being used.
TEAM OF 18,000 campaign is getting old!Image

Watch the Wild will go get old players Image
at a discount that need help being convinced to play.

The WILD could be the cellar team in the Northwest next year?Image

Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:41 pm
by WendyClark
Ryan Malone getting 4.5 mil a year :shock: but i guess 50-60 point a year guys are worth that in the "new NHL"

Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 6:11 pm
by sinbin006
Word on the street is that Rolston couldn't strike a deal with the Lightning and has just signed with the New Jersey Devils for the same amount that the Wild offered him :roll: 4 years, $20 million

Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:28 pm
by EREmpireStrikesBack
We didn't want him back anyway. He has become way too reliant on that slapper and it isn't going to get any better. I'd rather they give a young guy some time or spend that $ on someone with a little youth.

:idea:

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 11:08 pm
by d man 16
I think tampa is gonna be sick this year. With stakamos coming in after tearing up major juniors and their other skill players. I think they will put together a very good PP. also with the addition of a better goalie I think they will be a very good contender come playoffs

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 10:07 am
by pondhockey11
Tampa Bay can't play defense. I mean maybe the great mullet can change that but I doubt it. I think second or third in their division is best they'll do which won't be good enough to make the playoffs. Washington is still my favorite for the southeast division as long as theodore plays well and Carolina is still a tough team to face. They may be getting closer to being better, but aren't playoff material yet.

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:13 pm
by Reggie
EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:We didn't want him back anyway. He has become way too reliant on that slapper and it isn't going to get any better. I'd rather they give a young guy some time or spend that $ on someone with a little youth.

:idea:
The Wild did want him back, but he didn't want to play in Minnesota.

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:36 pm
by EREmpireStrikesBack
Reggie wrote:
EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:We didn't want him back anyway. He has become way too reliant on that slapper and it isn't going to get any better. I'd rather they give a young guy some time or spend that $ on someone with a little youth.

:idea:
The Wild did want him back, but he didn't want to play in Minnesota.
Come on Reg, do you really think I was talking from the standpoint of the Wild front office...? :roll:

And it wasn't so much about where he wanted to play, it was that he wanted to test the open market.

:idea:

Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:35 am
by Reggie
EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:
Reggie wrote:
EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:We didn't want him back anyway. He has become way too reliant on that slapper and it isn't going to get any better. I'd rather they give a young guy some time or spend that $ on someone with a little youth.

:idea:
The Wild did want him back, but he didn't want to play in Minnesota.
Come on Reg, do you really think I was talking from the standpoint of the Wild front office...? :roll:

And it wasn't so much about where he wanted to play, it was that he wanted to test the open market.

:idea:
HE DIDN"T WANT TO PLAY FOR THE WILD..... Why wouldn't you want Rolston back? Best player on the team last year!

Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 7:33 am
by EREmpireStrikesBack
Reggie wrote:
EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:
Reggie wrote: The Wild did want him back, but he didn't want to play in Minnesota.
Come on Reg, do you really think I was talking from the standpoint of the Wild front office...? :roll:

And it wasn't so much about where he wanted to play, it was that he wanted to test the open market.

:idea:
HE DIDN"T WANT TO PLAY FOR THE WILD..... Why wouldn't you want Rolston back? Best player on the team last year!
You can think what you want pal.

And are you kidding me? Did you not read my post? You must have a different definition of great hockey player. And a sad one at that.

:idea:

Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 2:00 am
by Reggie
EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:
Reggie wrote:
EREmpireStrikesBack wrote: Come on Reg, do you really think I was talking from the standpoint of the Wild front office...? :roll:

And it wasn't so much about where he wanted to play, it was that he wanted to test the open market.

:idea:
HE DIDN"T WANT TO PLAY FOR THE WILD..... Why wouldn't you want Rolston back? Best player on the team last year!
You can think what you want pal.

And are you kidding me? Did you not read my post? You must have a different definition of great hockey player. And a sad one at that.

:idea:
I'm not your pal and I know for fact that he did NOT want to play for the Wild!

Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:52 pm
by sinbin006
Reggie wrote:
EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:
Reggie wrote: HE DIDN"T WANT TO PLAY FOR THE WILD..... Why wouldn't you want Rolston back? Best player on the team last year!
You can think what you want pal.

And are you kidding me? Did you not read my post? You must have a different definition of great hockey player. And a sad one at that.

:idea:
I'm not your pal and I know for fact that he did NOT want to play for the Wild!
So...you're Brian Rolston's pal??? :roll:

Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 7:00 pm
by EREmpireStrikesBack
sinbin006 wrote:
Reggie wrote:
EREmpireStrikesBack wrote: You can think what you want pal.

And are you kidding me? Did you not read my post? You must have a different definition of great hockey player. And a sad one at that.

:idea:
I'm not your pal and I know for fact that he did NOT want to play for the Wild!
So...you're Brian Rolston's pal??? :roll:
:lol: :lol: :lol:

:idea:

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:33 pm
by Reggie
sinbin006 wrote:
Reggie wrote:
EREmpireStrikesBack wrote: You can think what you want pal.

And are you kidding me? Did you not read my post? You must have a different definition of great hockey player. And a sad one at that.

:idea:
I'm not your pal and I know for fact that he did NOT want to play for the Wild!
So...you're Brian Rolston's pal??? :roll:
Good one :roll:

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:39 pm
by EREmpireStrikesBack
Reggie wrote:
sinbin006 wrote:
Reggie wrote: I'm not your pal and I know for fact that he did NOT want to play for the Wild!
So...you're Brian Rolston's pal??? :roll:
Good one :roll:
As are you, sir.

:idea:

Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:56 pm
by Reggie
4 Minnesota boys on the roster going into camp. Bochenski, Smith, Smaby, and Lundin.

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:13 pm
by CINBHockeyParent
[quote="Reggie"]4 Minnesota boys on the roster going into camp. Bochenski, Smith, Smaby, and Lundin.[/quote]

True,
but where has Lundin been this year, injured? since Tochet arrived they have really mixed it up at the blue line, I see more of Smaby then Lundin these days, which last year was the other way around.