HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Posted: **Mon Dec 15, 2008 6:41 pm**

Just looking at the PS2 rankings. Is Rosemount really 0-6? How can this program not win any games? They had some very good youth programs over the past half dozen years? Anyone know anything about them? Did players leave?

Posted: **Mon Dec 15, 2008 6:48 pm**

From watching them once I know they had a goalie in the net that really struggled. They have tried another one but he has struggled as well with the exception of the most recent game against Eastview. Another they they don't get many shots. Only averaging 19 shots a game. Defense is not much help for the goalie they give up alot.

As far as kids leaving for private schools how that has hurt them I'm not sure. They also have no experience everyone graduated last year.

Posted: **Mon Dec 15, 2008 7:21 pm**

Thats what happens when you graduate an entire roster but i guess the bright side is that they should be returning most of this team for next year....this year might continue to be ugly though

Posted: **Mon Dec 15, 2008 9:14 pm**

Rosemount is a great hockey program. Over the past they have fell victim to kids leaving for AHA and STA along with other Lake Conference schools. Last year was the year that they had waited for and everyone in the town knows it. That team was one of the best in the state. The youth programs have not been as good as they wanted to be over the years but they will emerge again and get back to where they deserve to be. Don't blame Macho yet, this is a team filled to the top with rookies. They may not do well this year but once those rookies get experience they should make their way back up the Lake Conference rankings. You can never count out the Irish!

Posted: **Mon Dec 15, 2008 9:59 pm**

...except this year

Posted: **Tue Dec 16, 2008 1:16 pm**

dynamicD wrote:...except this year

Settle down All Conference, Rosemount has had ONE year that they had tourament possiblilities and that was last year. They'll go back to being an also ran again in the tough Lake conference like always.

Posted: **Wed Dec 17, 2008 12:21 am**

Why do players leave this program more than others????? Its been that way since the 90's? What gives?

Posted: **Wed Dec 17, 2008 7:20 pm**

HappyHockeyFan wrote:
dynamicD wrote:...except this year
Settle down All Conference, Rosemount has had ONE year that they had tourament possiblilities and that was last year. They'll go back to being an also ran again in the tough Lake conference like always.

And last year they got destroyed by Woodbury in the section final

Posted: **Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:35 pm**

toepull7 wrote:Why do players leave this program more than others????? Its been that way since the 90's? What gives?

That has been the case with Woodbury for along time before Bolin became coach. Most of the good kids would go to Hill or Cretin or some other private school

Posted: **Sat Jan 17, 2009 9:27 am**

i know they lost basically there whole team from last year. but geez. what is going on over there? there 0-15?! or something like that. This team didnt struggle this bad in youth hockey. why are they so terrible this year. they shouldnt be 0-15

Posted: **Sat Jan 17, 2009 12:06 pm**

[quote="PoNd HocKey ChAmP67"]i know they lost basically there whole team from last year. but geez. what is going on over there? there 0-15?! or something like that. This team didnt struggle this bad in youth hockey. why are they so terrible this year. they shouldnt be 0-15[/quote]

0 and 15 is a real tough pill to swallow...

Posted: **Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:59 pm**

HappyHockeyFan wrote:
dynamicD wrote:...except this year
Settle down All Conference, Rosemount has had ONE year that they had tourament possiblilities and that was last year. They'll go back to being an also ran again in the tough Lake conference like always.

Apparently you missed there 1992 season when they were 4-20-1 coming into the Tournament including one regular season win in those 4 games the other 3 coming in sections, but took runner up while losing to Greeway in the Class A Championship, just wanted to prove that if your going to make a smart re mark about a team you should make sure that the statement is fully true. And you can't look at what their youth teams are bringing up because things can easily change, kids mature at all different levels, and a bad team in peewees can easily change come high school because of that.

Posted: **Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:03 pm**

WarriorMacDaddy39 wrote:
HappyHockeyFan wrote:
dynamicD wrote:...except this year
Settle down All Conference, Rosemount has had ONE year that they had tourament possiblilities and that was last year. They'll go back to being an also ran again in the tough Lake conference like always.
Apparently you missed there 1992 season when they were 4-20-1 coming into the Tournament including one regular season win in those 4 games the other 3 coming in sections, but took runner up while losing to Greeway in the Class A Championship, just wanted to prove that if your going to make a smart re mark about a team you should make sure that the statement is fully true. And you can't look at what their youth teams are bringing up because things can easily change, kids mature at all different levels, and a bad team in peewees can easily change come high school because of that.

Actually, it was the Tier 2 Championship then. The first of two years of the Tier 1 and Tier 2 Tournament.

Posted: **Sat Jan 17, 2009 9:00 pm**

wbmd wrote:
WarriorMacDaddy39 wrote:
HappyHockeyFan wrote:Settle down All Conference, Rosemount has had ONE year that they had tourament possiblilities and that was last year. They'll go back to being an also ran again in the tough Lake conference like always.
Apparently you missed there 1992 season when they were 4-20-1 coming into the Tournament including one regular season win in those 4 games the other 3 coming in sections, but took runner up while losing to Greeway in the Class A Championship, just wanted to prove that if your going to make a smart re mark about a team you should make sure that the statement is fully true. And you can't look at what their youth teams are bringing up because things can easily change, kids mature at all different levels, and a bad team in peewees can easily change come high school because of that.
Actually, it was the Tier 2 Championship then. The first of two years of the Tier 1 and Tier 2 Tournament.

Yes that's true, but at this time people know it as Class A.

Posted: **Sat Jan 17, 2009 10:54 pm**

Tier 2 and Class A are not even close to the same thing. Tier 2 was the championship for the bottom 50%.

Posted: **Mon Jan 19, 2009 1:52 pm**

their schedule looks pretty tough and their next game is bloomington jefferson... what games could they possibly win?? or are they gonna go defeated with the lions

Posted: **Mon Jan 19, 2009 2:44 pm**

southernlakes29 wrote:their schedule looks pretty tough and their next game is bloomington jefferson... what games could they possibly win?? or are they gonna go defeated with the lions

There best chance of winning would be Bloomington Kennedy, other than that I don't see them winning any more.

Posted: **Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:52 am**

Well to be pretty honest, Rosemount will NOT have most of the team back next year. They will have close to half since they have I believe 9 seniors this year. All, but the their 1st line played JV last year with the exception of 2-3 sophs.

The main issue they have, is once again with the goalies. Rosemount has been kind of notorious for having mediocre net-minders, and this year is another one of those years. Their goalie will give up a soft 1st goal, then its downhill from there.

Posted: **Sat Jan 31, 2009 10:13 pm**

Got their first win today against Eastview in a 4-3 OT game.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Rosemount High

Rosemount High

Irish Hockey