Page 1 of 1

Mahtomedi & Owatonna

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 3:25 pm
by wbmd

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 3:31 pm
by theoneandonly1
2-1 Mahtomedi

Holker picks up his second goal

Edit: Now its tied up 2-2 , Von Ruden with the goal for Owatonna

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 4:33 pm
by theoneandonly1
Mahtomedi 4
Owatonna 2
After the 2nd Period

Goals- Zurn from Adams and Marshall
Adams from Zurn and Marshall

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 4:58 pm
by slapstkhound
theoneandonly1 wrote:Mahtomedi 4
Owatonna 2
After the 2nd Period

Goals- Zurn from Adams and Marshall
Adams from Zurn and Marshall
If these commentators keep gushing about Ben Marshall, I'm gonna puke. Are there no other Mahtomedi players on the ice?

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 7:16 pm
by sn1per
slapstkhound wrote:
theoneandonly1 wrote:Mahtomedi 4
Owatonna 2
After the 2nd Period

Goals- Zurn from Adams and Marshall
Adams from Zurn and Marshall
If these commentators keep gushing about Ben Marshall, I'm gonna puke. Are there no other Mahtomedi players on the ice?
It was Kevin Gorg, what do you expect? He's an idiot.

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 7:53 pm
by TheBlizzard
5-4 Mahtomedi Wins!

Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 7:11 am
by WayOutWest
slapstkhound wrote: If these commentators keep gushing about Ben Marshall, I'm gonna puke. Are there no other Mahtomedi players on the ice?
Mahtomedi has one very good line, and exactly one defenseman of note. Owatonna doesn't have even that. There was very little in this game, to gush about.

Marshall is good, but it wasn't that difficult to stand out in this group. He's a sophomore, and he has already committed to the U, is that right?
He's a fast and tough little bugger, but I would think he's going to need to grow a bit before he steps into WCHA action.

Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 9:58 am
by thiscrazygame
WayOutWest wrote:
slapstkhound wrote: If these commentators keep gushing about Ben Marshall, I'm gonna puke. Are there no other Mahtomedi players on the ice?
Mahtomedi has one very good line, and exactly one defenseman of note. Owatonna doesn't have even that. There was very little in this game, to gush about.

Marshall is good, but it wasn't that difficult to stand out in this group. He's a sophomore, and he has already committed to the U, is that right?
He's a fast and tough little bugger, but I would think he's going to need to grow a bit before he steps into WCHA action.
I am sure he will play in the WCHA but, even Gorg had to finally say he is a little wet behind the ears.

Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 10:22 am
by Gopher Blog
WayOutWest wrote:Marshall is good, but it wasn't that difficult to stand out in this group. He's a sophomore, and he has already committed to the U, is that right? He's a fast and tough little bugger, but I would think he's going to need to grow a bit before he steps into WCHA action.
You have to remember he is still adjusting to a new full time position on defense. With some years of growth ahead of him and getting situated to playing defense, he should be ready to roll by the time he hits college. The tools are definitely there though.

Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 6:11 pm
by youngblood08
Gopher Blog wrote:
WayOutWest wrote:Marshall is good, but it wasn't that difficult to stand out in this group. He's a sophomore, and he has already committed to the U, is that right? He's a fast and tough little bugger, but I would think he's going to need to grow a bit before he steps into WCHA action.
You have to remember he is still adjusting to a new full time position on defense. With some years of growth ahead of him and getting situated to playing defense, he should be ready to roll by the time he hits college. The tools are definitely there though.

Kid has been playing Defense ever since my son has been playing with and against him.

Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 6:36 pm
by Gopher Blog
youngblood08 wrote:Kid has been playing Defense ever since my son has been playing with and against him.
Well, I don't know his entire playing history but I was under the impression that he played forward for a while prior to this past year.

Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 6:53 pm
by youngblood08
Gopher Blog wrote:
youngblood08 wrote:Kid has been playing Defense ever since my son has been playing with and against him.
Well, I don't know his entire playing history but I was under the impression that he played forward for a while prior to this past year.

So why make the comment?

Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 6:58 pm
by Gopher Blog
youngblood08 wrote:So why make the comment?
Because I had been told that and I had read it in different places. If you go back and read US Hockey Report, they state on more than one occasion on that site that he transitioned from forward to defense in the prior year.

Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 7:00 pm
by thiscrazygame
youngblood08 wrote:
Gopher Blog wrote:
youngblood08 wrote:Kid has been playing Defense ever since my son has been playing with and against him.
Well, I don't know his entire playing history but I was under the impression that he played forward for a while prior to this past year.

He played forward during the select 15's

Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 7:01 pm
by Gopher Blog
thiscrazygame wrote:He played forward during the select 15's
I suppose that is part of the confusion. Thanks.