HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Posted: **Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:29 pm**

With the way the SEC has been goin down this year, and still 6 games remaining with almost if not all of them being conference play, i see it as woodbury on top with stillwater roseville and WBL very close behind. whos going to challenge woodbury for the sec title in the home stretch?
(w-t-l)
Woodbury-(7-1-1)
Stillwater-(6-2-3)
Roseville-(6-1-3)
WBL-(6-0-3)

I believe these are the records, correct me if im wrong. but it looks pretty close with woodbury and WBL only having conference games remaining. Roseville with 2 non conference, and stillwater with 3 non conference left.

Posted: **Sun Jan 25, 2009 8:12 pm**

White Bear has 2 conference losses to Woodbury and Stillwater

Posted: **Sun Jan 25, 2009 8:24 pm**

blanco oso wrote:With the way the SEC has been goin down this year, and still 6 games remaining with almost if not all of them being conference play, i see it as woodbury on top with stillwater roseville and WBL very close behind. whos going to challenge woodbury for the sec title in the home stretch?
(w-t-l)
Woodbury-(7-1-1)
Stillwater-(6-2-3)
Roseville-(6-1-3)
WBL-(6-0-3)

I believe these are the records, correct me if im wrong. but it looks pretty close with woodbury and WBL only having conference games remaining. Roseville with 2 non conference, and stillwater with 3 non conference left.

Here are the correct standings in the S.E.C. to date:

Woodbury (7-1-1)
Cretin (7-2-1)
Roseville (6-3-1)
White Bear Lake (6-3-0)
Stillwater (5-3-2)
Hastings (3-4-2)
Mounds View (2-7-1)
Forest Lake (1-7-1)
Park (1-8-1)

Posted: **Sun Jan 25, 2009 8:32 pm**

White Bear has lost to Woodbury, Stillwater, and Roseville already this season. But if they can somehow get the split against all three teams to close out the conference. They have a great shot at winning the SEC, and getting the possible 2 seed come section time. A tough task indeed, all on the road, but the Bears are now full strentgh, and I believe there best hockey is still ahead of them.

Posted: **Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:19 pm**

wbmd i got my stats from pointstreak. any recommendations on where a better site is? unless i read it wrong...

Posted: **Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:07 am**

blanco oso wrote:With the way the SEC has been goin down this year, and still 6 games remaining with almost if not all of them being conference play, i see it as woodbury on top with stillwater roseville and WBL very close behind. whos going to challenge woodbury for the sec title in the home stretch?
(w-t-l)
Woodbury-(7-1-1)
Stillwater-(6-2-3)
Roseville-(6-1-3)
WBL-(6-0-3)

I believe these are the records, correct me if im wrong. but it looks pretty close with woodbury and WBL only having conference games remaining. Roseville with 2 non conference, and stillwater with 3 non conference left.

It's W-L-T, get it straight. You are starting to sound like me wife who loves to relay the scores with the lower number first!

Posted: **Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:26 am**

Woodbury wins it, no doubt. Roseville next followed by stillwater and WB. MV could make a strong run to move up these last few weeks.

Posted: **Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:56 pm**

BodyShots wrote:
blanco oso wrote:With the way the SEC has been goin down this year, and still 6 games remaining with almost if not all of them being conference play, i see it as woodbury on top with stillwater roseville and WBL very close behind. whos going to challenge woodbury for the sec title in the home stretch?
(w-t-l)
Woodbury-(7-1-1)
Stillwater-(6-2-3)
Roseville-(6-1-3)
WBL-(6-0-3)

I believe these are the records, correct me if im wrong. but it looks pretty close with woodbury and WBL only having conference games remaining. Roseville with 2 non conference, and stillwater with 3 non conference left.
It's W-L-T, get it straight. You are starting to sound like me wife who loves to relay the scores with the lower number first!

i love your wife

Posted: **Sat Jan 31, 2009 11:13 pm**

Standings in the S.E.C. to date: (2-1-09)

Woodbury (9-1-1)
Cretin (8-2-1)
White Bear Lake (8-3-0)
Roseville (7-3-1)
Stillwater (5-5-2)
Hastings (3-6-2)
Forest Lake (3-7-1)
Mounds View (2-9-1)
Park (1-10-1)

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 12:04 am**

wbmd wrote:Standings in the S.E.C. to date: (2-1-09)

Woodbury (9-1-1)
Cretin (8-2-1)
White Bear Lake (8-3-0)
Roseville (7-3-1)
Stillwater (5-5-2)
Hastings (3-6-2)
Forest Lake (3-7-1)
Mounds View (2-9-1)
Park (1-10-1)

its gonna be close

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:51 am**

This week has the top four playing:

Woodbury (9-1-1) at Mounds View and home against Park

Cretin (8-2-1) home against Forest Lake and at Stillwater

White Bear Lake (8-3-0) at Stillwater and home against Hastings

Roseville (7-3-1) home against Hastings and Forest Lake

On paper, they all look like wins for each of the top four. However, that is why they play the game as Woodbury, White Bear and Roseville have shown in losses this season.

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 2:10 pm**

Body shots??? My ex-wife used to do the same thing in relaying scores...

I traded her for a 6-pack of Bud Light!!! I was so happy to do so, I gave 5 to my buddies and drank one myself!!!

I think the way WBL is playing right now, on all cylinders, the remaining foes better look out. WBL is not just winning, but they are whipping up the opponents... Mouds View isn't all that bad, but pregame post, I stated this team would come out attacking MV and they did. I don't think Roseville, Stillwater and Woodbury will see the same team they played earlier.

My only concern, as I am pretty close to the team with the work I do for them, they have got to get healthy. I haven''t talked to him directly the past few days, but Zach Hoffman has been playing all year with a hip he injured this summer, and I am willing to bet he's playing with 100% heart and 60% discomfort.

Folks... he's intense... he's a leader... and for the minutes he's logging right now, he will be so key down the stretch. I hope Sags knows when it's safe to rest him. He didn't see much of the ice at all the 3rd period vs MV, if at all, and we need to make sure he's able to provide the leadership come crunch time.

So... WBL may not pass Woodbury, but I think they may just fly into that #2 spot in conference.

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 2:17 pm**

I agree with you completely Goldfish. And if they can put a solid performance together against Woodbury to finish off the regular season. It should be a huge confidence booster come section time. Should be some good hockey coming down the stretch.

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 7:36 pm**

WBLhockeyfan04?? Thanks for agreeing with me that trading my ex-wife for a 6 pack of Bud Light was a good trade...

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 8:35 pm**

I meant everything you said underneath that.

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 11:21 pm**

Doesn't matter, all I need is a section championship to be satisfied

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 11:31 pm**

TheNightman wrote:Doesn't matter, all I need is a section championship to be satisfied

So another first-round loss at State is just fine?

Posted: **Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:13 am**

They need to get there first, but it'll be up for grabs come state time with 2AA, 5AA, and 6AA having some of the top teams in the state unfortunately only able to send one team.

Posted: **Wed Feb 04, 2009 8:19 pm**

Standings in the S.E.C. to date: (2-4-09)

Woodbury (9-1-1)
Cretin (8-2-1)
White Bear Lake (8-3-0)
Roseville (7-3-1)
Stillwater (5-5-2)
Hastings (4-6-2)
Forest Lake (3-8-1)
Mounds View (2-9-1)
Park (1-10-1)

Posted: **Wed Feb 04, 2009 8:22 pm**

karl(east) wrote:
TheNightman wrote:Doesn't matter, all I need is a section championship to be satisfied
So another first-round loss at State is just fine?

We can worry about that when the time comes

Posted: **Thu Feb 05, 2009 5:45 pm**

i agree with goldfishdude... i dunno what mustangman was talkin about wbl finishing after woodbury stillwater and roseville.. wb is on fire and they'll be the number two seed for sure unless they completely blow the rest of the season but i highly doubt that will happen.. but then again you never know with wb always being on and off

Posted: **Fri Feb 06, 2009 2:40 pm**

Up to date S.E.C. standings (2-6-09)

Woodbury (10-1-1)
Cretin (9-2-1)
Roseville (8-3-1)
White Bear Lake (8-3-1)
Stillwater (5-5-3)
Hastings (3-7-2)
Forest Lake (3-8-1)
Mounds View (2-10-1)
Park (1-10-1)

Posted: **Fri Feb 06, 2009 2:59 pm**

wbmd wrote:Up to date S.E.C. standings (2-6-09)

Woodbury (10-1-1) Park, CDH, Rose and WBL
Cretin (9-2-1) @Still, @Wood, @WBL, @Rose
Roseville (8-3-1) FL, WBL, @Wood, CDH
White Bear Lake (8-3-1) Hast, @ Rose, CDH, @Wood
Stillwater (5-5-3) CDH, @MV, Park
Hastings (3-7-2) @WBL, @MV
Forest Lake (3-8-1) @ Rose , Park
Mounds View (2-10-1) Still, @Park, Hast
Park (1-10-1)@Wood, @FL,MV, @Still

Posted: **Sat Feb 07, 2009 11:14 pm**

Current S.E.C. standings (2-8-09)

Woodbury (11-1-1)
Cretin (10-2-1)
Roseville (9-3-1)
White Bear Lake (9-3-1)
Stillwater (5-6-3)
Hastings (3-8-2)
Forest Lake (3-9-1)
Mounds View (2-10-1)
Park (1-11-1)

Big games this week are:

Woodbury vs. Cretin and Roseville
Cretin at Woodbury and at White Bear
Roseville vs. White Bear and at Woodbury
White Bear at Roseville and vs. Cretin

Posted: **Sun Feb 08, 2009 2:31 pm**

If Woodbury plays their best I don't think they should have a problem with Cretin or Roseville but White Bear is a different story they've been playing some good hockey recently and I think that is going to be a great game. If White Bear wins they probably will not pass Woodbury for the conference title but it would be a great moral boost when they head off to play in the super tight section 4aa.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

SEC race?

SEC race?

Re: SEC race?

Re: SEC race?

Re: SEC race?