Page 1 of 1
Jefferson retraction
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:45 am
by Lakeviewing
I thought that Jefferson might stubble somewhere in their Lake conference play, but given their remaining conference schedule, it appears they are truely a team to be recogized and possibilty go undefeated in the Lake. I still think EP has an outside chance to beat Jefferson at home, but a possible loss on the road at EP should not leave them, but a #1 seed in their section. This section playoff is one of the toughest sections to get through. Edina appears to be tired. Giles needs to rest his 1st line and gear up for what might be a great Section final. It would be great if we could watch Jefferson and Edina in the section final.
Re: Jefferson retraction
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 6:06 am
by youngblood08
Lakeviewing wrote:I thought that Jefferson might stubble somewhere in their Lake conference play, but given their remaining conference schedule, it appears they are truely a team to be recogized and possibilty go undefeated in the Lake. I still think EP has an outside chance to beat Jefferson at home, but a possible loss on the road at EP should not leave them, but a #1 seed in their section. This section playoff is one of the toughest sections to get through. Edina appears to be tired. Giles needs to rest his 1st line and gear up for what might be a great Section final. It would be great if we could watch Jefferson and Edina in the section final.
Totally agree. no jump at all after the first period last night.
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 10:06 am
by HardF1
Wasn't it 4-0 after the 1st? and then only 1 goal for the Jags after that? I would have liked to have heard a double digit score over Kennedy.
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 10:18 am
by eagle4life9
I think Jefferson probably played their top 2 lines very little in the second and third periods. They dont need to prove anything by beating Kennedy by double digits.
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:45 pm
by theoneandonly1
HardF1 wrote:Wasn't it 4-0 after the 1st? and then only 1 goal for the Jags after that? I would have liked to have heard a double digit score over Kennedy.
I don't think this topic was about the Kennedy game but yeah it was 4-0 after 1. The third line saw a ton of playing time and the 4th line got in quite a bit in the third period.