Breck vs Blake (01/29/09)
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:50 pm
Who you got?
HighSchoolHockeyForums.com
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
Breck vs Blake (01/29/09)
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:03 pm
This will not be close, even if it is a rivalry game. Breck in running time.
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:08 pm
History says this one will be close.hshckfan08 wrote:This will not be close, even if it is a rivalry game. Breck in running time.
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:31 pm
will this be televised?
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:53 pm
I believe it will be televised on FSN.mch wrote:will this be televised?
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:58 pm
8-1 Mustangs by a touchdown!
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:45 am
I think in rivalry games, all bets are off. This might be fun to watch. I love the underdog - GO BEARS - RIDE THE MUSTANGS!
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:21 am
Yep scheduled for FSN. should be a good game to watch.starmvp wrote:I believe it will be televised on FSN.mch wrote:will this be televised?
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:52 pm
Breck hasn't lost a game since the Schwann's cup and dominated a better Orono squad on Tuesday night. I don't think this is going to be close. The only reason it's not a laugher is because it's at the Blake old barn! Should be a fun game to catch on TV! Breck 6-2Doglover wrote:I think in rivalry games, all bets are off. This might be fun to watch. I love the underdog - GO BEARS - RIDE THE MUSTANGS!
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:29 pm
Breck takes this one 6-1
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 7:49 pm
why is doerring playing forward?
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:44 pm
The better question might be why did Hayes start in nets over Oncay?mch wrote:why is doerring playing forward?
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:44 pm
Wondering the same thing, then on the powerplay, they put him and Brunette at the point, kinda weird.mch wrote:why is doerring playing forward?
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:39 pm
The Bears need another Kent Patterson! Yikes.pipes3030 wrote:The better question might be why did Hayes start in nets over Oncay?mch wrote:why is doerring playing forward?
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:46 pm
Haha yes, though it seems like they are in a greater need of some offense first. You won't win any games when you don't score, no matter how many goals the tenders let in.Hockeyguy_27 wrote:The Bears need another Kent Patterson! Yikes.pipes3030 wrote:The better question might be why did Hayes start in nets over Oncay?mch wrote:why is doerring playing forward?
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:48 pm
6-0 final.
Running Time
Running Time
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 7:46 am
I was surprised Doering was at Forward too. Did he play forward the entire game? He is still listed as a D on the MN Hockey Hub:
http://mbhsh.stats.pointstreak.com/divi ... position=D
RK PLAYER TEAM POS GP G A PTS +/- PIM PPG PPA SHG SHA GWG SHOTS SPCT
1 Herd, Reid BRE D 18 7 13 20 +2 12 1 3 1 0 0 2 3.500
2 Trevathan, James SPA D 18 6 12 18 0 32 3 5 0 1 1 0 .000
Doerring, Blake BLK D 16 3 15 18 +5 28 1 2 0 0 0 4 .750
http://mbhsh.stats.pointstreak.com/divi ... position=D
RK PLAYER TEAM POS GP G A PTS +/- PIM PPG PPA SHG SHA GWG SHOTS SPCT
1 Herd, Reid BRE D 18 7 13 20 +2 12 1 3 1 0 0 2 3.500
2 Trevathan, James SPA D 18 6 12 18 0 32 3 5 0 1 1 0 .000
Doerring, Blake BLK D 16 3 15 18 +5 28 1 2 0 0 0 4 .750
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 12:47 pm
He has been playing forward since the Johnson game. Plays the point on special teams.hockeyboys wrote:I was surprised Doering was at Forward too. Did he play forward the entire game? He is still listed as a D on the MN Hockey Hub:
http://mbhsh.stats.pointstreak.com/divi ... position=D
RK PLAYER TEAM POS GP G A PTS +/- PIM PPG PPA SHG SHA GWG SHOTS SPCT
1 Herd, Reid BRE D 18 7 13 20 +2 12 1 3 1 0 0 2 3.500
2 Trevathan, James SPA D 18 6 12 18 0 32 3 5 0 1 1 0 .000
Doerring, Blake BLK D 16 3 15 18 +5 28 1 2 0 0 0 4 .750