Section 3AA
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 11:03 pm
Not the most exciting section this year, but what are peoples predictions? Will Woodbury walk through easily? Chance at upsets?
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
Well i'll be the first to not agree. I can't really see Hastings getting through Woodbury, Apple Valley/Eastview, and Cretin/Eagan. Maybe they could pull off one upset but three in a row I doubt it.wbmd wrote:I know many of you won't agree, however, Hastings could pull off an upset in this section.
I was just talking one upset for Hastings.joycer10 wrote:Well i'll be the first to not agree. I can't really see Hastings getting through Woodbury, Apple Valley/Eastview, and Cretin/Eagan. Maybe they could pull off one upset but three in a row I doubt it.wbmd wrote:I know many of you won't agree, however, Hastings could pull off an upset in this section.
o ok that could happen your post was just a little confusingwbmd wrote:I was just talking one upset for Hastings.joycer10 wrote:Well i'll be the first to not agree. I can't really see Hastings getting through Woodbury, Apple Valley/Eastview, and Cretin/Eagan. Maybe they could pull off one upset but three in a row I doubt it.wbmd wrote:I know many of you won't agree, however, Hastings could pull off an upset in this section.
You know the section is bad when Hastings gets 6th.wbmd wrote:official seedings
1- Woodbury
2- Cretin
3- Eagan
4- Apple Valley
5- Eastview
6- Hastings
7- Park
8- Rosemount
9- Henry Sibley
I realize Woodbury deserves the top seed, but, it could mean bad luck. In 2007 and 2008, the #2 seed advanced to the tourney with wins over the #1 seed.
The same can be said about 4AA.pioneerhockey12 wrote:not a very good section.....
Like I said earlier in this thread, Hastings is capable of pulling off at least one win in this section.gopherhockey21 wrote:You know the section is bad when Hastings gets 6th.wbmd wrote:official seedings
1- Woodbury
2- Cretin
3- Eagan
4- Apple Valley
5- Eastview
6- Hastings
7- Park
8- Rosemount
9- Henry Sibley
I realize Woodbury deserves the top seed, but, it could mean bad luck. In 2007 and 2008, the #2 seed advanced to the tourney with wins over the #1 seed.
If Woodbury does win the section, it won't be easily. Especially if they have to play Cretin in the championship. It is hard to beat a good team three times in a season.Nodak Sioux wrote:Woodbury should win this section easily!
It's as good as 4aa at least there is a team in this section with less then 5 lossespioneerhockey12 wrote:not a very good section.....
Actually, a team with less than 4 losses since Woodbury is 20-3-2.joycer10 wrote:It's as good as 4aa at least there is a team in this section with less then 5 lossespioneerhockey12 wrote:not a very good section.....
Woodbury is catching AV at the wrong time. I guarantee they have their hands full and would not be surprised at all to see an AV win. Completely healthy. Played very well vs Eagan last night and should have won. Eagan will give Cretin all they can handle also.Nodak Sioux wrote:Woodbury should win this section easily!
I think Allple Valley might be catching Woodbury at the wrong time Woodbury is coming a huge overtime victory over WBL who in my opinion is better than Eagan, and also like Apple Valley is very healthy. Also Eagan will run into a Cretin team that has won 7 of of their last 8 and I would honestly be suprised to see them lose to Eagan. There is obviously a significant chance that either Woodbury or Cretin will get upset before the finals but I believe a Woodbury Cretin final is easliy the most likely scenerio.Hoops wrote:Woodbury is catching AV at the wrong time. I guarantee they have their hands full and would not be surprised at all to see an AV win. Completely healthy. Played very well vs Eagan last night and should have won. Eagan will give Cretin all they can handle also.Nodak Sioux wrote:Woodbury should win this section easily!
This section will not have Woodbury/Cretin final.
Why would you direct people to a duplicate thread that was started well after this one?
Just bringing it back to the top and letting ROYALmoose25 know that there was already a thread started.gitter wrote:Why would you direct people to a duplicate thread that was started well after this one?
If you want it locked up, send a pm to Lee.
I think he already knows, since you posted the same thing in his thread.wbmd wrote:Just bringing it back to the top and letting ROYALmoose25 know that there was already a thread started.gitter wrote:Why would you direct people to a duplicate thread that was started well after this one?
If you want it locked up, send a pm to Lee.
Oops...guess not.Nodak Sioux wrote:Woodbury should win this section easily!