Who is the Worst #1 seed AA
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:26 pm
let me know who you think is the worst top seeded team
HighSchoolHockeyForums.com
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
Who is the Worst #1 seed AA
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:28 pm
what a stupid topic the top seeds are all the best teams in the state so with that they are far from being the worst....
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:29 pm
At this stage in the playoffs is this subject really necessary? What does it matter and do we need another thread bashing any team, now? Really what is your objective here?
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:33 pm
their are eight top seeds who is the worst? 
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:35 pm
First of all the correct spelling is; there and second the question is not worth answering.wtbearlk1111 wrote:their are eight top seeds who is the worst?
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:48 pm
why get so upset are you from Mayo or Tartan?
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:06 pm
New Ulm
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:13 pm
Since when is New Ulm in AA???HShockeywatcher wrote:New Ulm
Are you new?????
Just another post from you proving you know nothing about HS hockey, yet you seem to post more than anyone on here.
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:22 pm
Despite there being more teams in Class A, there is much disrespect given in both discussion and threads about Class A hockey.
Are you really trying to say that no thread has ever gotten off topic at all? And I really doubt that mentioning a Class A team in a thread that was rudely entitled Class AA is really that big of a deal.
Everyone was posting comments about being negative. Without being negative at all, of the 16 #1 seeds, New Ulm is probably the worst team. This is no disrespect to their program at all, but with their schedule and performances it is easy to see.
But thanks for yet another respectful post from you.
Are you really trying to say that no thread has ever gotten off topic at all? And I really doubt that mentioning a Class A team in a thread that was rudely entitled Class AA is really that big of a deal.
Everyone was posting comments about being negative. Without being negative at all, of the 16 #1 seeds, New Ulm is probably the worst team. This is no disrespect to their program at all, but with their schedule and performances it is easy to see.
But thanks for yet another respectful post from you.
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:26 pm
You are one person who complains when threads get off topic and it is OK for you to do it???HShockeywatcher wrote:Despite there being more teams in Class A, there is much disrespect given in both discussion and threads about Class A hockey.
Are you really trying to say that no thread has ever gotten off topic at all? And I really doubt that mentioning a Class A team in a thread that was rudely entitled Class AA is really that big of a deal.
Everyone was posting comments about being negative. Without being negative at all, of the 16 #1 seeds, New Ulm is probably the worst team. This is no disrespect to their program at all, but with their schedule and performances it is easy to see.
But thanks for yet another respectful post from you.
Don't you have clss early in the morning? Time for sleep kid!