2009-10 Scores
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:31 pm
Post them here. Thanks!
Lee
Lee
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
SCORING SUMMARY:goalzilla wrote:Stillwater 5
Minnetonka 3
Box Score (no penalty detail)mnhockey3535 wrote: Rosemount 4 White bear Lake 2 ?!?
Shouldn't need any "penalty detail" to know who was sitting in the box for WBL when Rosemount scored both PP goals ...joehockey wrote:Box Score (no penalty detail)mnhockey3535 wrote: Rosemount 4 White bear Lake 2 ?!?
First: R-Goehring (Kelly, Riley), 10:14, pp.
Second: R-Kelly (Goehring, Riley), 12:59, pp; WBL-Bruestle (Green), 13:09.
Third: WBL-Lowell, 5:37; R-Kelly (Warweg, Riley), 6:23; R-Sampson (Vath), 15:52, ENG.
Goalie Saves:
WBL-Abrahamson 8-10-8--26; R-Dantzscher 9-10-6--25
Just out of curiosity who was it?jumpstart wrote:Shouldn't need any "penalty detail" to know who was sitting in the box for WBL when Rosemount scored both PP goals ...joehockey wrote:Box Score (no penalty detail)mnhockey3535 wrote: Rosemount 4 White bear Lake 2 ?!?
First: R-Goehring (Kelly, Riley), 10:14, pp.
Second: R-Kelly (Goehring, Riley), 12:59, pp; WBL-Bruestle (Green), 13:09.
Third: WBL-Lowell, 5:37; R-Kelly (Warweg, Riley), 6:23; R-Sampson (Vath), 15:52, ENG.
Goalie Saves:
WBL-Abrahamson 8-10-8--26; R-Dantzscher 9-10-6--25
Let's not mention names. But one player did receive 5 penalties during the course of the game. Hopefully lesson learned. A player MUST learn that not only is she hurting herself but the team as well. I want to add that if this player corrected this problem she would be a TOP player for her age. She has all the tools.Just_Another_Fan wrote:Just out of curiosity who was it?jumpstart wrote:Shouldn't need any "penalty detail" to know who was sitting in the box for WBL when Rosemount scored both PP goals ...joehockey wrote: Box Score (no penalty detail)
First: R-Goehring (Kelly, Riley), 10:14, pp.
Second: R-Kelly (Goehring, Riley), 12:59, pp; WBL-Bruestle (Green), 13:09.
Third: WBL-Lowell, 5:37; R-Kelly (Warweg, Riley), 6:23; R-Sampson (Vath), 15:52, ENG.
Goalie Saves:
WBL-Abrahamson 8-10-8--26; R-Dantzscher 9-10-6--25
Yes, two things you can count on…Bensonmum wrote:Whew! And we were really worried about WBL this year. I guess we can relax a little knowing it's the same old out there. It's a cultural thing...
Coaches will work it out before we play the mighty raiders.Bensonmum wrote:Whew! And we were really worried about WBL this year. I guess we can relax a little knowing it's the same old out there. It's a cultural thing...
Is Edina that good, AHA that bad or a combination of both?OntheEdge wrote:Edina 9 - AHA 0. One of those ugly one-sided games and it was not much fun to watch.
No Romo to run the show, and dumb penalties. maybe a mix of both.northshore guy wrote:Is Edina that good, AHA that bad or a combination of both?OntheEdge wrote:Edina 9 - AHA 0. One of those ugly one-sided games and it was not much fun to watch.
Yeah I did see that a certain player recieved a 10/2 for checking from behind.... where do people see them finishing in the Missota conference?hockeya1a wrote:No Romo to run the show, and dumb penalties. maybe a mix of both.northshore guy wrote:Is Edina that good, AHA that bad or a combination of both?OntheEdge wrote:Edina 9 - AHA 0. One of those ugly one-sided games and it was not much fun to watch.