Page 1 of 1

South St. Paul

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 3:33 pm
by Theclassicburbs
Coming off a few bright years in which the Packers under Jeff Lagoo produced numerous division I prospects such as Wilcox, Faulk, Palmquist, are they going to be competitive once again?

Re: South St. Paul

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:44 pm
by High Flyer
Theclassicburbs wrote:Coming off a few bright years in which the Packers under Jeff Lagoo produced numerous division I prospects such as Wilcox, Faulk, Palmquist, are they going to be competitive once again?
I don't think it would be fair to say that Lagooo produced Faulk, but he can take some credit for Palmquist.

They will be a much different team with out Palmquist this year. I thought he was one of the best defensive defensemen I saw last year, quitely going about his business. Sometimes you didn't even knew he was there, until he would decide step up offensivly.

Wilcox is good enough to keep them in most games, so as long as he is in net, they will be competitive.

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:33 pm
by Hockeywatcher123
as long as they have wilcox they will be a team you cant overlook, but they will not be as good as years prior

Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 11:36 am
by thiscrazygame
Hockeywatcher123 wrote:as long as they have wilcox they will be a team you cant overlook, but they will not be as good as years prior
Anyone know how SSP did on their scrimmages this weekend.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 10:36 pm
by ilivegreen60
didn't know 3 was NUMEROUS. with Wilcox they do stand a chance against decently good teams this year, but they just don't have the depth they've had the last few years.