HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Well, instead of everybody having their own topic, I thought I would just start a new one that can consolidate all the teams playing short handed due to suspensions. We don't need to name players!

Confirmed to date:

WBL - 10
East Ridge - 7

Does it really matter that much?

I think it does. Accountability - nothing wrong with that.

starmvp wrote:Does it really matter that much?

On the score board, no it doesn't. But to know that teams are short handed, whether it be suspensions or injuries, is important. While it's not a suspension, knowing that one of Tonka's best players is hurt and they still haven't lost a game is a good tid bit.

If you know of suspensions, and the length of suspension, being a discussion board, that could stir up discussion.

Just my two cents

HShockeywatcher wrote:

starmvp wrote:Does it really matter that much?

On the score board, no it doesn't. But to know that teams are short handed, whether it be suspensions or injuries, is important. While it's not a suspension, knowing that one of Tonka's best players is hurt and they still haven't lost a game is a good tid bit.

If you know of suspensions, and the length of suspension, being a discussion board, that could stir up discussion.

Just my two cents

He never mentioned injuries, he made this only for suspensions

As long as the discussions remain civil and non-inflammatory, why not? We may all learn something, who knows?

Moderators will referee in any case, and that's a good thing.

Since we have sources that like to rank teams, and discussion also pertains to this team beat that team, and by how much, I would think knowing about suspensions and/or injuries is important.

I didn't include injuries because I thought the list would become too long. Missing games due to injuries, or playing hurt, both have an affect on a game. Some injuries are worse than others.

So, I'm going with the KISS method. Suspension only!