Page 1 of 1

Century vs Lakeville South 1/19

Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:30 am
by Bucky
Century's starting goalie injured against Mayo on 1/16, would be surprised if he is available for game vs Lakeville.

Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 12:09 pm
by starmvp
L. South 4-1

Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:29 pm
by dump and chase
South's young guns keep putting up numbers in this match-up.

South 6-3

Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:38 pm
by Nodak Sioux
I'll say 5-3 South because Brock Kautz is not in net for Century. If he was in net I would give Century the edge. This game should decide the one and two seeds for the section.

Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 6:16 pm
by SEMNHOCKEYFAN
Cam Sellnow is a strong goalie for century and lead them to state last year.....i dont see why you people are thinking with B. Kautz not in net itll make a difference

I think this game will be tight with the winner winning by a goal in OT.....

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:13 am
by Nodak Sioux
SEMNHOCKEYFAN wrote:Cam Sellnow is a strong goalie for century and lead them to state last year.....i dont see why you people are thinking with B. Kautz not in net itll make a difference

I think this game will be tight with the winner winning by a goal in OT.....
Cam Sellnow is a strong goalie. However, I think Brock is a little better then Cam, not to take anything away from him. But when you put Cam in net who has not played much varsity this season and who probably has little to no confidence since getting his spot takin away from him by a younger goalie and to just throw him into a big game like this one just doesn't fair well for Century.

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:22 am
by SEMNHOCKEYFAN
Nodak Sioux wrote:
SEMNHOCKEYFAN wrote:Cam Sellnow is a strong goalie for century and lead them to state last year.....i dont see why you people are thinking with B. Kautz not in net itll make a difference

I think this game will be tight with the winner winning by a goal in OT.....
Cam Sellnow is a strong goalie. However, I think Brock is a little better then Cam, not to take anything away from him. But when you put Cam in net who has not played much varsity this season and who probably has little to no confidence since getting his spot takin away from him by a younger goalie and to just throw him into a big game like this one just doesn't fair well for Century.
True to that......i still dont think its fair for Cam to loose his spot in the first place and hes playing only in either mop up roles or in his case his only start was against Austin....

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:35 am
by eastsideguy
3-2 Century

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:28 pm
by wtbearlk1111
I believe Sellnow lost the starting by not being able to dress the 1st few weeks of the season. When the Kautz kid got his chance he has played very well. So i woundn't feel to bad he brought it on himself.

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:56 pm
by Nodak Sioux
wtbearlk1111 wrote:I believe Sellnow lost the starting by not being able to dress the 1st few weeks of the season. When the Kautz kid got his chance he has played very well. So i woundn't feel to bad he brought it on himself.
When Sellnow was out Kautz came in and did very well but they never gave Sellnow a chance to earn his spot back. So now that Brocks out lets say Sellnow starts doing really well, do you give the starting job back to Sellnow and make Kautz sit on the bench or do you start switching off or give it back to Kautz?

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:12 pm
by Hockey1919
If Kautz is out with a concussion who knows for how long this is Sellnows chance to earn that starting spot back.

Century?

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:43 pm
by Sticks24
When I left with 8 minutes to go it was 8-1 South. Shots were about 35-11 or so. Century couldn't even get the puck out of their own end. Not even in the same league. I don't care which goalie is in net. Century's "D" gave their goalie no support. I hope it was just an off night for Century, but South is getting better each game they play.

Re: Century?

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:44 pm
by Nodak Sioux
Sticks24 wrote:When I left with 8 minutes to go it was 8-1 South. Shots were about 35-11 or so. Century couldn't even get the puck out of their own end. Not even in the same league. I don't care which goalie is in net. Century's "D" gave their goalie no support. I hope it was just an off night for Century, but South is getting better each game they play.
:shock:

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:55 pm
by Marty McSorely
Is the Big 9 really that bad?

Re: Century?

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:57 pm
by playerplayer1
Nodak Sioux wrote:
Sticks24 wrote:When I left with 8 minutes to go it was 8-1 South. Shots were about 35-11 or so. Century couldn't even get the puck out of their own end. Not even in the same league. I don't care which goalie is in net. Century's "D" gave their goalie no support. I hope it was just an off night for Century, but South is getting better each game they play.
:shock:
9-1 with 4 mins left. That Kloos, Osterberg and Harvey line is unbelievable. Top 5 in the state IMO. Almost 100 points between the three of them playing in the Lake conference is pretty darn good!! =D>