Page 1 of 1
Bantam A rankings
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:31 pm
by hockey=life99
1.Duluth East
2.Woodbury
3.Edina
4.Grand Rapids
5.Minnetonka
6.Eden Prarie
7.Wayzata
8.Maple Grove
9.Eagan
10.Rosea
11.Burnsville
12.Elk River
13.Blaine
14.Jefferson
15.Lakeville South
16.Apple Valley
17.Cloquet
18.East Grand Forks
19.Chaska
20.Centeninal
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:47 pm
by hockey=life99
If you have any comments, scores, or other rankngs it would be nice and convenent if you would post them here thanks!
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:49 pm
by no-fly-bys
lakeville south too high.
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:43 pm
by GreekChurch
no-fly-bys wrote:lakeville south too high.
I agree - Lakeville South is too high, and so is Elk river in my opinion, didn't they just lose to centennial 7 -1. The rest looks pretty good to me.
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:44 pm
by Reg7
no-fly-bys wrote:lakeville south too high.
Agreed...River Heights beat South 2-1 and RH is an average team...
bantam a
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:54 pm
by blueblood
tonka is too low at #5. they should be above edina who is behind them in d6 standings. the standings can be found at:
www.d6hockey.net
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:56 pm
by Hockey guy1486
You may want to look at Moundsview. They had a great showing in St. Cloud losing to Burnsville in the Ship.
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:42 am
by koivu09
EP is too high, Centennial beat Elk River 7-1.
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 9:07 am
by hockey74
We will see if Lakeville South is too high. In the next couple of weeks they will play Eagan and Woodbury in league play.
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:28 pm
by pantherfan
I agree. Miinetonka should be #2 or 3 With Woodbury. 2 very solid teams and it is a toss up for which one should be #2 and or 3. I would also have to move Lakeville So down.
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:24 pm
by SouthHockeyFan
South beat Eagan 4-2
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:37 pm
by Hockeydad1893
koivu09 wrote:EP is too high, Centennial beat Elk River 7-1.
Why is ep to high? They beat Dulth East, Edina and Wayzeta a couple of times.
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 8:39 pm
by hockey=life99
Hockeydad1893 wrote:koivu09 wrote:EP is too high, Centennial beat Elk River 7-1.
Why is ep to high? They beat Dulth East, Edina and Wayzeta a couple of times.
i Think He ment ER not EP
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:10 pm
by hockey=life99
1.Duluth East
2. Woodbury
3.Minnetonka
4.Edina
5.Grand Rapids
6Burnsville
7.Osseo Maple Grove
8.Eden Prarie
9.Wayzata
10.Eagan
11.Roseau
12.Blomington Jefferson
13.Blaine
14.Moundsview
15.Apple Valley
16.Lakeville south
17.Elk River
18.Clouquet
19.Centennial
20.Andover
What do you guys thinks
Comments or questions? or any othere rankings you guys have?
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:26 pm
by SconiPuckster
Centennial beat EP 2 of the 3 times they've played this year most recently 6-1 in Roseau?
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:44 pm
by Chuck Norris Fan
SconiPuckster wrote:Centennial beat EP 2 of the 3 times they've played this year most recently 6-1 in Roseau?
yes but centennial has also dropped games to moorhead, elkriver, st. cloud, roseau, cloquet, andover.
got throttled by edina and woodbury and east
seems they are too inconsistent to be highly ranked but if they show up they might surprise someone in the post season. That is a big "
IF"
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 2:03 pm
by willie15
Woodbury too high rochester should be rannked
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 2:53 pm
by Titan2020
willie15 wrote:Woodbury too high rochester should be rannked
Why should Rochester be ranked? They have not even won 15 games this year. Win your District playoffs, then yes...
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 4:12 pm
by Nobodyonya
Chuck Norris Fan wrote:SconiPuckster wrote:Centennial beat EP 2 of the 3 times they've played this year most recently 6-1 in Roseau?
yes but centennial has also dropped games to moorhead, elkriver, st. cloud, roseau, cloquet, andover.
got throttled by edina and woodbury and east
seems they are too inconsistent to be highly ranked but if they show up they might surprise someone in the post season. That is a big "
IF"
And again by Andover and Coon Rapids in the District Tournament
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 5:03 pm
by observer
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 6:19 pm
by willie15
Lakeville South hasnt even had that great of a year and they're ranked plus they're one win away from elimination in districts so they shouldn't probably be ranked either. By the way rochester has beaten quite a few top 20 teams including Woodbury and White Bear Lake
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:57 pm
by hockey7957
"Lakeville South hasnt even had that great of a year and they're ranked plus they're one win away from elimination in districts so they shouldn't probably be ranked either. By the way rochester has beaten quite a few top 20 teams including Woodbury and White Bear Lake."
I believe Lakeville South beat Rochester
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 2:01 pm
by willie15
Shouldnt a top 20 team beat such a bad Rochester team by more?
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:13 pm
by HudsonHawk
Theoretically - Rochester and Lakeville South could play again this Sunday. I'm scheduled to be there for the 5:30 game, but would come early to see this match-up.
Lakeville South has been an interesting team to follow. They win the Bloomington tourney, by beating some pretty decent teams (maybe catching them off guard - but a win is a win)......they are darn near unbeatable afterwards...........then lose to River Heights in D8 playoffs. ???
HH
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:16 pm
by bigdaddydangler
I see the top teams in the State being these 5 teams:
Duluth East, Woodbury, Minnetonka, Grand Rapids and Osseo Maple Grove. These teams have been very consistent over the year and I see the State Tournament Champion coming from these teams. Records as of last week of these 5 teams are 212-38-8. 82% winning percentage.
Next tier would be Burnsville, Apple Valley, Eagan, Blaine.
Teams that could surprise would be Roseau, Mounds View.