Page 1 of 2

Jesus Christ vikings

Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:30 pm
by HockeyMN1
After 4 hours of yelling at my TV...that

Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:34 pm
by Goldfishdude
Outgained the Saints 475 yards and 31 first downs to Saints 257 and 15.... The Packer fans get the last laugh that Favre's last pass of the season was an INT... It was a great run, though.

Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:34 pm
by Jcumber5
They suck u in and then rip ur heart out

Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:35 pm
by starmvp
What a bummer...

Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:38 pm
by whos_it
Not like most people will care but Jesus Christ does not deserve to have his name said in front of the Vikings

Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:38 pm
by hockeyfan893
I'd like to point out the last time we were in this situation.

Loss 30-27.

Now this year, loss 31-28.

What's going on!?

Vikes

Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:41 pm
by blueblood
ARRRRRRGHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:46 pm
by karl(east)
whos_it wrote:Not like most people will care but Jesus Christ does not deserve to have his name said in front of the Vikings
:lol: Particularly when the real, pagan Vikings were most famous for ransacking and pillaging British monasteries.

At any rate, Vikings = White Bear Lake of the NFL.

Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:47 pm
by hockeydad
karl(east) wrote:
whos_it wrote:Not like most people will care but Jesus Christ does not deserve to have his name said in front of the Vikings
:lol: Particularly when the real, pagan Vikings were most famous for ransacking and pillaging British monasteries.

At any rate, Vikings = White Bear Lake of the NFL.
Thanks Karl.... first time I've smiled since the game ended :lol:

Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:49 pm
by Goldfishdude
karl(east) wrote:
whos_it wrote:Not like most people will care but Jesus Christ does not deserve to have his name said in front of the Vikings
:lol: Particularly when the real, pagan Vikings were most famous for ransacking and pillaging British monasteries.

At any rate, Vikings = White Bear Lake of the NFL.
:lol: :lol:

I swear to.......... a stack of pancakes (that better?).... that I WAS going to put that in my post, Karl, but I have taken more than enough heat about my Bears, and I thought I better not!!! ](*,) =; [-X :-#

But since you let the cat out of the bag...........

The difference between the Vikes and the Bears???

I will never hate the Vikes.....

Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:13 pm
by Zamman
Here is what I posted on Facebook:

I am not a Vikings fans, but in my opinion they went to the Bakery and picked up too many turnovers.....

No stadium this year

Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:20 pm
by salol44
Goldfishdude wrote:
karl(east) wrote:
whos_it wrote:Not like most people will care but Jesus Christ does not deserve to have his name said in front of the Vikings
:lol: Particularly when the real, pagan Vikings were most famous for ransacking and pillaging British monasteries.

At any rate, Vikings = White Bear Lake of the NFL.
:lol: :lol:

I swear to.......... a stack of pancakes (that better?).... that I WAS going to put that in my post, Karl, but I have taken more than enough heat about my Bears, and I thought I better not!!! ](*,) =; [-X :-#

But since you let the cat out of the bag...........

The difference between the Vikes and the Bears???

I will never hate the Vikes.....
I think you meant to say "Moorhead of the NFL"

Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:29 pm
by GreekChurch
After 98 I couldn't believe it. I think it prepared me for this - still how brutal to give it away, they didn't deserve to win.

Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:31 pm
by karl(east)
salol44 wrote:
Goldfishdude wrote:
karl(east) wrote: :lol: Particularly when the real, pagan Vikings were most famous for ransacking and pillaging British monasteries.

At any rate, Vikings = White Bear Lake of the NFL.
:lol: :lol:

I swear to.......... a stack of pancakes (that better?).... that I WAS going to put that in my post, Karl, but I have taken more than enough heat about my Bears, and I thought I better not!!! ](*,) =; [-X :-#

But since you let the cat out of the bag...........

The difference between the Vikes and the Bears???

I will never hate the Vikes.....
I think you meant to say "Moorhead of the NFL"
I thought about Moorhead, but the Vikings just have a sense of ineptitude about them that I don't associate with the Spuds. Harsh but true, I'm afraid.

And Goldy, a stack of pancakes sounds delicious.

Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:40 pm
by watchdog
i havent watched a viking game since 98. i decided to watch this game tonight and laugh while i collect my winnings tomorrow on all the bets i made on the saints. the vikings always choke and they always will.

Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:54 pm
by Spooge
Soooo depressing. I was really looking forward to indoctrinating a new generation into TRUE Vikes fans. You know... the kind that get to watch us get to the Super Bowl and take a big steamy dump. ](*,)

Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:36 pm
by youngblood08
NFL wanted the Saints to win.

Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:49 pm
by warriors41
youngblood08 wrote:NFL wanted the Saints to win.
I disagree. I think they would have had better ratings with Brett Farve and AP in the super bowl

Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:54 am
by sachishi4
Vikes have no one to blame but themselves. 33 yard line with 19 secs left. They blow it with a stupid penalty which puts them in a passing down.

thankfully, im a packers fan :)

Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:15 am
by hockey74
We should blame the ref's like we do in hockey!

Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:32 am
by wblhockeyfan8
karl(east) wrote:
whos_it wrote:Not like most people will care but Jesus Christ does not deserve to have his name said in front of the Vikings
:lol: Particularly when the real, pagan Vikings were most famous for ransacking and pillaging British monasteries.

At any rate, Vikings = White Bear Lake of the NFL.
:lol:
That was classic!

Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:05 am
by HShockeywatcher
warriors41 wrote:
youngblood08 wrote:NFL wanted the Saints to win.
I disagree. I think they would have had better ratings with Brett Farve and AP in the super bowl
Did you watch the 4th quarter and OT?

I will be the first to admit the Vikings did everything in their power to blow, but the calls and ball placements were all going the Saints' way. Take away the bogus pass interference call and things would've been fine.

Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:16 am
by silentbutdeadly3139
GreekChurch wrote:After 98 I couldn't believe it. I think it prepared me for this - still how brutal to give it away, they didn't deserve to win.
Super Bowls 4, 8, 9 and 11 prepared me for this ... that and looking at that clueless moron Childress all season.

No stadium for you !

Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:06 pm
by starmvp
hockey74 wrote:We should blame the ref's like we do in hockey!
Yes...

Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:20 pm
by southernmnscout
HShockeywatcher wrote:
warriors41 wrote:
youngblood08 wrote:NFL wanted the Saints to win.
I disagree. I think they would have had better ratings with Brett Farve and AP in the super bowl
Did you watch the 4th quarter and OT?

I will be the first to admit the Vikings did everything in their power to blow, but the calls and ball placements were all going the Saints' way. Take away the bogus pass interference call and things would've been fine.
HSHW---You mean to say take away the ungodly amount of turnovers and things would have been fine? They blew it themselves. You can blame the officials all you want, but they had many many chances to win that game and simply didn't.