Page 1 of 3
mv vs hill
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 8:39 pm
by livindahockeydream4life
Obviously mv is the underdog here but as of lately they are playin their best hockey and all it takes is a couple chances the question is do they have a chance?
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 8:59 pm
by codyy33
As much as it kills me to say this, I don't think Mounds View stands a chance.
I think Tartan or NSP were the two teams most capeable of beating Hill and they're both gone.
H-M: 5 MV: 1
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:03 pm
by hockeyfan893
One of Hill-Murray's strengths this year has been their depth, their ability to not have to rely on one line or player to produce, but rather expect production from multiple lines.
Now that we're getting into the meat of the section tournament, and into state, we'll get to see just how deep they really are.
Hill - 5
MV - 1
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:04 pm
by BodyShots
codyy33 wrote:As much as it kills me to say this, I don't think Mounds View stands a chance.
I think Tartan or NSP were the two teams most capeable of beating Hill and they're both gone.
H-M: 5 MV: 1
Must be a Classic Suburban fan.

Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:06 pm
by codyy33
BodyShots wrote:codyy33 wrote:As much as it kills me to say this, I don't think Mounds View stands a chance.
I think Tartan or NSP were the two teams most capeable of beating Hill and they're both gone.
H-M: 5 MV: 1
Must be a Classic Suburban fan.

I'm not really a fan of conferences. I'm just basing it off of the fact that Tartan and Hill usually play each other pretty close and North played two close games against Hill this year also.
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:18 pm
by livindahockeydream4life
Yes nsp and tartan played close games against hill but mv never lost to either of those teams so it'll probably b closer than people might think
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:22 pm
by youngblood08
codyy33 wrote:As much as it kills me to say this, I don't think Mounds View stands a chance.
I think Tartan or NSP were the two teams most capable of beating Hill and they're both gone.
H-M: 5 MV: 1
I can see why you think this way,
Hill vs
Tartan - 2 wins total score 7-0 Hill
North - 2 wins total score 9-6 Hill
and these were the 4th and 5th place team in CSC or some where in there with SSP. Man, those were some competitive games.
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:54 pm
by gophs16
NSP definitley played well against Hill this year but I disagree with you claiming they had the best chance against Hill. White Bear and Stillwater have the best chance easily and one word sums up my reasoning: Rivalry
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:23 pm
by youngblood08
I would say The "Traditional Rivalry" is WBL/Hill.
But due to the amount of Stillwater kids on the Hill roster this year and last I would say the ideas of that match-up is more of an "Emotional Rivalry" There is some genuine dislike between a few of these kids but for the most part they are civil of ice with each other.
The Hill/WBL rivalry will be stronger again in the next couple of years as the JV has more WBL kids then the other Hill Murray Recruiting areas. The same will be when the next group of Woodbury kids gets in the mix next year.
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:43 pm
by Northsider
Hill 5
MV 3
(empty netter)
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 11:21 pm
by Goldfishdude
Hate to pin it on one player, but Dylan Culver will have to play the game of his life in goal for the 'Stangs. MV cannot afford to play short-handed. H-M will eat them alive.
I missed H-M's first 1.5 periods versus Como, but H-M got 19 shots in the first period with only one goal, and it was just 3-0 with about 5-6 left in the second, before H-M scored two more to end the period. They just wore down Como's netminder.
H-M skated all four lines, from what I saw, and the first 3 are awfully balanced.
Culver can expect 35 shots minimum.
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 11:53 pm
by youngblood08
I see Eric Bradley did play for MV. 1 assist vs Tartan.
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 11:57 pm
by bigtimescout
Unfortunatly no chance for MV, a repeat of 08' when the Pioneers put a beat down of 7-1 on the Stangs. Good for the stangs for getting out of the quarters again though.
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:33 am
by wblhockeyfan8
You already know what I'm gonna say!
Back to reality...
HM 5 MV 1
Culver with 45 saves
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 4:36 pm
by wbhockey02
I'm going against the grain.
Publics-4
Privates-3, 2OT

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:16 pm
by Northsider
wbhockey02 wrote:I'm going against the grain.
Publics-4
Privates-3, 2OT

Maybe the public school could have a better chance to actually do this if their best player hadn't abandoned ship to go to that other public school down the road to the east.
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:21 pm
by wblhockeyfan8
Northsider wrote:wbhockey02 wrote:I'm going against the grain.
Publics-4
Privates-3, 2OT

Maybe the public school could have a better chance to actually do this if their best player hadn't abandoned ship to go to that other public school down the road to the east.
Wolter is a good player but he isn't a huge game changer.
13G 9A 22pts
Solid amount but you have to remember that's on a line with Birkinbine and Wahlin.
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:31 pm
by sachishi4
Northsider wrote:wbhockey02 wrote:I'm going against the grain.
Publics-4
Privates-3, 2OT

Maybe the public school could have a better chance to actually do this if their best player hadn't abandoned ship to go to that other public school down the road to the east.
wait are you saying he isnt playing for his hometown?! Dear god! Crucify him, he must have been recruited!
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:37 pm
by got some
sachishi4 wrote:Northsider wrote:wbhockey02 wrote:I'm going against the grain.
Publics-4
Privates-3, 2OT

Maybe the public school could have a better chance to actually do this if their best player hadn't abandoned ship to go to that other public school down the road to the east.
wait are you saying he isnt playing for his hometown?! Dear god! Crucify him, he must have been recruited!
I didn't realize
shoreview had a high school!

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:52 pm
by Pioneerprideguy
got some wrote:sachishi4 wrote:Northsider wrote:
Maybe the public school could have a better chance to actually do this if their best player hadn't abandoned ship to go to that other public school down the road to the east.
wait are you saying he isnt playing for his hometown?! Dear god! Crucify him, he must have been recruited!
I didn't realize
shoreview had a high school!

It's right next to Centennial.

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 9:10 pm
by wblhockeyfan8
got some wrote:sachishi4 wrote:Northsider wrote:
Maybe the public school could have a better chance to actually do this if their best player hadn't abandoned ship to go to that other public school down the road to the east.
wait are you saying he isnt playing for his hometown?! Dear god! Crucify him, he must have been recruited!
I didn't realize
shoreview had a high school!

Funny thing is he's attacking another HM fan, if Sachi wasn't only lurking in the background waiting to pounce on other posters maybe he'd know that.

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:05 pm
by "R"
Hill 4
MV 2
Who wants to see a MV vs Stilly/WBL final anyways. A championship for Stilly or WBL would not feel the same without going through Hill.
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:53 pm
by DotaDangler
Hm-4
Mv-1
North St. Paul impressed me in the games I saw them play against Hill, is NSP a young team that will get better the next cpl years?
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:54 pm
by prospector
this post looks alot like the post MV vs Tartan and we know how that game ended. If the Stangs can stay out of the box and Culver plays a GREAT game, it'll be CLOSE nobody would have thought MV would have beaten WB NSP or Tartan this year but here we are
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:56 pm
by wblhockeyfan8
prospector wrote:this post looks alot like the post MV vs Tartan and we know how that game ended. If the Stangs can stay out of the box and Culver plays a GREAT game, it'll be CLOSE nobody would have thought MV would have beaten WB NSP or Tartan this year but here we are
True enough!
Go 'Stangs!
