Page 1 of 1
Ratings/Rankings success
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:19 pm
by NumberCruncher
Has anyone checked to see how successful any ranking system did during the section seedings? PageStat2, StarTrib, Mitch Hawker, ...
Or should we divvy the work?
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:22 pm
by HShockeywatcher
Re: Ratings/Rankings success
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:58 pm
by east hockey
NumberCruncher wrote:Has anyone checked to see how successful any ranking system did during the section seedings? PageStat2, StarTrib, Mitch Hawker, ...
Or should we divvy the work?
PageStat ended up +5 against the seedings, Mitch's system (he
really needs to give his system a name
) ended up +7
Lee
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:07 pm
by goldy313
Nice way to avenge last years loss, serves the coaches right for "winning" last year
What does the yearly series with Mitch look like?
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:59 pm
by karl(east)
Congrats to the computers for breaking their losing streak.
I'll give my own rankings a thorough review over the tourney so I can learn from them for next year.
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 9:25 am
by NumberCruncher
I would love to collectively start from scratch and make some new numbers. Or if we could get a thorough explanation of pagestat besides what we get in the faq