Page 1 of 1
Independent Classic Scores and Comments
Posted: Fri May 21, 2010 11:39 am
by observer
Scores and Comments?
Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 7:00 am
by observer
Top two seeds
95s
ITR 26'ers 3-0
Team Dynamics 2-0-1
96s Gold
NPI Leafs IA 3-0
Legacy 3-0
96s Maroon
Velocity 3-0
Blades 2-0-1
97s
Torspo 3-0
Bauer Vapor 2-0-1
98s
Icemen 2-0-1
Manitoba Jr. Steelers 3-0
99s
Wisconsin 99 Selects 2-0-1
Machine 3-0
00s
Machine 4-0
Manitoba Young Guns 3-0-1
01s
Lake Superior Stars 3-0-1
Minnesota Northern Wings 3-0-1
http://www.eastonaaa.com/page/show/1640 ... and-scores
Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 7:10 pm
by polyman22
99 Machine won over the Monopoly 6 to 1. Monopoly skated well, not quite as deep as the Machine. Congrats to the Monopoly coaches to get them that far with a newer team.
Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 7:26 pm
by PuckTime
'01 Wings won over Stars... Went to OT, then to a shootout. Two pretty evenly matched teams.
Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 7:27 pm
by hotsauce
polyman22 wrote:99 Machine won over the Monopoly 6 to 1. Monopoly skated well, not quite as deep as the Machine. Congrats to the Monopoly coaches to get them that far with a newer team.
They seem to be finding their way to the finals at this age quite a bit, but can't seem to win one yet. Yes I have a kid in there program and would really like to see them succeed. In talking to a 99' parent it sounds like they have been in the finals in the last 3 invite tournament but lost in the first 2 to the Blades and Today vs. the machine. it seems like that is a tough next step. Good luck to them they are doing something right.
Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 7:30 pm
by polyman22
I saw part of the game and they did alot of good plays.
Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 8:38 pm
by thunderwolf
PuckTime wrote:'01 Wings won over Stars... Went to OT, then to a shootout. Two pretty evenly matched teams.
The website says that the Stars lost the semis to Torspo and it was Torspo - Wings in the champ
Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 8:55 pm
by mnhockey2019
'01 championship was Wings vs. Stars. Torspo lost to the Stars in the semis, and beat the Stealth in the 3rd place game.
Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 9:45 pm
by hockeydad30
Who won 98 open
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 7:48 am
by InigoMontoya
What would possess a coach, manager, or parent to put a child on the ice that is too old for the age group?
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 8:09 am
by black sheep
InigoMontoya wrote:What would possess a coach, manager, or parent to put a child on the ice that is too old for the age group?
Greed or Ignorance
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 8:35 am
by muckandgrind
InigoMontoya wrote:What would possess a coach, manager, or parent to put a child on the ice that is too old for the age group?
Who did that?
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 10:07 am
by InigoMontoya
Greed or Ignorance
What would you need to be ignorant about - when your child was born? You're looking at the brackets or the team room TVs in the lobby and you see 98, 98, 98, 98, but you send your 97 into the locker room anyway. These kids are not being raised in a tar paper shack in rural Arkansas. If someone from another team points out how old the kid is, I'm pretty sure mom knows, as well.
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 10:15 am
by nahc
94 tourney had some top notch teams playing with some of the best 94's in the state competing. Fast, physical games with some outstanding talent on all the teams. Iowa Jr Blackhawks (all Minnesota kids I believe) were outstanding. Could probably beat a LOT of High School A Varsity teams, they were that good.........Icemen played ok.......Phit teams also played ok..........just a lot of talent on all teams......pretty impressive.....
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 10:46 am
by black sheep
InigoMontoya wrote:Greed or Ignorance
What would you need to be ignorant about - when your child was born? You're looking at the brackets or the team room TVs in the lobby and you see 98, 98, 98, 98, but you send your 97 into the locker room anyway. These kids are not being raised in a tar paper shack in rural Arkansas. If someone from another team points out how old the kid is, I'm pretty sure mom knows, as well.
Ignorance is bliss...if you truly believe...it's not a lie
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 12:10 pm
by thunderwolf
InigoMontoya wrote:Greed or Ignorance
What would you need to be ignorant about - when your child was born? You're looking at the brackets or the team room TVs in the lobby and you see 98, 98, 98, 98, but you send your 97 into the locker room anyway. These kids are not being raised in a tar paper shack in rural Arkansas. If someone from another team points out how old the kid is, I'm pretty sure mom knows, as well.
So what 98 teams dressed a 97?
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 1:13 pm
by InigoMontoya
98 - 97 was being used in an illustrative manner only. I heard that a player was caught at the S&S, and the team was stripped of those wins; I also heard that a player was caught in the Indy and continued to play anyway.
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 6:57 pm
by inthenet
nahc wrote:94 tourney had some top notch teams playing with some of the best 94's in the state competing. Fast, physical games with some outstanding talent on all the teams. Iowa Jr Blackhawks (all Minnesota kids I believe) were outstanding. Could probably beat a LOT of High School A Varsity teams, they were that good.........Icemen played ok.......Phit teams also played ok..........just a lot of talent on all teams......pretty impressive.....
I will agree on the Waterloo 94's. Very good team, and also had some 95's on team.
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 10:50 pm
by hockeyfan893
I was most impressed with the 94 blackhawks and the 95 ITR. The ITR team was loaded with a pair of Shattuck's top 95's - was a treat to watch from a viewers standpoint. Overall the talent level for all three levels of this tournament was incredible.
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 5:52 am
by observer
Here are the invite level Championship scores. Missing the 97 invite final.
95s
ITR 26'ers 8
Icemen 5
96s Gold
Legacy 6
Jr. Steelers 1
96s Maroon
Velocity 4
WI 96 Selects 2
97s
Legacy
Northern Wings
98s
Manitoba Jr. Steelers 5
Easton Synergy 0
99s
Machine 6
Monopoly 1
00s
Machine 6
Manitoba Lightning 3
01s
Lake Superior Stars 4 SO
Minnesota Northern Wings 3
http://www.eastonaaa.com/page/show/1640 ... and-scores
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 6:31 pm
by MNHawker
observer wrote:Here are the invite level Championship scores. Missing the 97 invite final.
95s
ITR 26'ers 8
Icemen 5
96s Gold
Legacy 6
Jr. Steelers 1
96s Maroon
Velocity 4
WI 96 Selects 2
97s
Legacy 2
Northern Wings 1
98s
Manitoba Jr. Steelers 5
Easton Synergy 0
99s
Machine 6
Monopoly 1
00s
Machine 6
Manitoba Lightning 3
01s
Lake Superior Stars 4 SO
Minnesota Northern Wings 3
http://www.eastonaaa.com/page/show/1640 ... and-scores
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 6:39 pm
by MNHawker
InigoMontoya wrote:98 - 97 was being used in an illustrative manner only. I heard that a player was caught at the S&S, and the team was stripped of those wins; I also heard that a player was caught in the Indy and continued to play anyway.
Anyone know what 97 Bauer Vapor did wrong in Indy Cup in the 3rd place game they were up by 5 goals and a few players were removed from Vapor's Bench... Vapor ended up losing.
I knew they brought in some (4-5 blades helmet stickers) Blades kids, but if they were 97's who cares... Other than the kids\Parents that are paying Bauer Vapor... and not getting regular shifts or not brought to the games at all...
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 8:39 pm
by WhosPuckIsItAnyways?
I don't think they did anything wrong. They got a few soft goals early but they were up against a tough Torspo team that refused to pack it in ... 6-5 final ... was a good game
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:40 am
by observer
Did you say removed from the bench?
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 8:05 am
by black sheep
they have this backwards...score should be the other way...wings won