Page 1 of 1
Penn State adds Womens and Mens D1 Hockey for 2012-2013
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 12:34 pm
by hockey21
This is great more opportunities for women hockey players.
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/news/story?id=5583790
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:10 am
by MaxSnatch
But this is bad news for the fans of the WCHA and the Huskies, Mavericks, Bulldogs and Susie Q's(or whatever their name will be)..........
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:27 am
by The Bone
Why is this bad for the WCHA teams?
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 10:44 am
by royals dad
The Bone wrote:Why is this bad for the WCHA teams?
Would give the Big 10 six member schools that have hockey and thus enough for their own league. Adding a Big 10 Hockey Conference would allow the Big 10 network to broadcast hockey. This would be a potentially large revenue stream.
That would mean that the WCHA would loose its two biggest markets (Twin Cities and Madison) and lots of revenue. They would still be a viable league with adding the Beavers and Omaha but not the same powerhouse they are today. I don't think Minnesota and Wisconsin will have a ton of say in whether this happens or not.
Big ten hockey league
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 1:25 pm
by hockey_for_fun
The Big Ten Women's league would have 4 teams.
Penn State, Ohio State, Wisconsin, Minnesota.
Maybe, the new league would only apply to the Men's teams.
Re: Big ten hockey league
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:49 pm
by State Champ 97
hockey_for_fun wrote:The Big Ten Women's league would have 4 teams.
Penn State, Ohio State, Wisconsin, Minnesota.
Maybe, the new league would only apply to the Men's teams.
Doubtful
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 2:13 pm
by Hux
MaxSnatch wrote:But this is bad news for the fans of the WCHA and the Huskies, Mavericks, Bulldogs and Susie Q's(or whatever their name will be)..........
Everyone immediately assumes that the WCHA will be left in the lurch. Having six Big 10 teams allows for a Big 10 championship, like the Ivy League schools do in the ECAC. There is no need to form a separate conference, at least not until additional Big 10 teams are created.
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 5:35 pm
by brookyone
With women's varsity hockey not likely to materialize out of Mich. State or Michigan anytime soon, I don't think you're going to see a Big Ten conference for the women anytime soon either. Although circumstances are different for CC and DU...not likely to see division I women's hockey from either of them.
It's unfortunate some powers that be at the Michigan institutions are so opposed to supporting varsity hockey for the women...or at best, have little interest in the game as a collegiate varsity sport. Need those roster spots for a growing talent pool...and those schools could easily support women's teams IMO.
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:08 am
by hockeya1a
brookyone wrote:With women's varsity hockey not likely to materialize out of Mich. State or Michigan anytime soon, I don't think you're going to see a Big Ten conference for the women anytime soon either. Although circumstances are different for CC and DU...not likely to see division I women's hockey from either of them.
It's unfortunate some powers that be at the Michigan institutions are so opposed to supporting varsity hockey for the women...or at best, have little interest in the game as a collegiate varsity sport. Need those roster spots for a growing talent pool...and those schools could easily support women's teams IMO.
Maybe someone needs to yell, Title 9 at Michigan. it might work.

Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 7:33 am
by Hux
hockeya1a wrote:brookyone wrote:With women's varsity hockey not likely to materialize out of Mich. State or Michigan anytime soon, I don't think you're going to see a Big Ten conference for the women anytime soon either. Although circumstances are different for CC and DU...not likely to see division I women's hockey from either of them.
It's unfortunate some powers that be at the Michigan institutions are so opposed to supporting varsity hockey for the women...or at best, have little interest in the game as a collegiate varsity sport. Need those roster spots for a growing talent pool...and those schools could easily support women's teams IMO.
Maybe someone needs to yell, Title 9 at Michigan. it might work.

They are compliant thanks to a rowing team with over 100 members.

Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:11 am
by observer
A Michigan college, or two, should offer girls hockey. There are at least 3 19U Tier I teams playing in Michigan, Little Caesars, Belle Tire and Victory Honda. That is a lot of high end talent in the State that all have to leave the State to play D1 hockey. Are there any D3 programs in Michigan?
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:55 am
by joehockey
observer wrote:A Michigan college, or two, should offer girls hockey. There are at least 3 19U Tier I teams playing in Michigan, Little Caesars, Belle Tire and Victory Honda. That is a lot of high end talent in the State that all have to leave the State to play D1 hockey. Are there any D3 programs in Michigan?
Isn't Wayne State in Michigan?
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 11:45 am
by observer
Michigan Womens Hockey
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 12:12 pm
by FlyingWarrior
Isn't Wayne State in Michigan?[/quote]
The only other schools are Adrian Collage and Finlandia University at the D3 level.