HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Posted: **Fri Nov 19, 2010 11:27 pm**

Picks?

http://assets.ngin.com/attachments/docu ... 9_2010.xls

Peewee A

November 26-28, 2010

Pool A
Mankato
Shakopee
Luverne
Forest Lake

Pool B
New Ulm
Rochester Gold
Sioux Falls Blue
Kansas City Stars

Posted: **Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:54 am**

Luverne rolls.

Posted: **Sun Nov 28, 2010 10:03 pm**

I think it ended up something like this.

K.C. Stars
Shakopee
Sioux Falls
Forest Lake
Mankato
Rochester
Luverne
New Ulm

Posted: **Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:23 am**

No 3rd place game. Forest Lake never got to plat S.S.

Posted: **Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:24 am**

Souix Falls I mean.

Posted: **Mon Nov 29, 2010 2:32 pm**

old goalie85 wrote:No 3rd place game. Forest Lake never got to plat S.S.

Yeah, no concy game... that was weird. I just based it on record and goal differential.

Posted: **Mon Nov 29, 2010 3:55 pm**

roundhead wrote:
old goalie85 wrote:No 3rd place game. Forest Lake never got to plat S.S.
Yeah, no concy game... that was weird. I just based it on record and goal differential.

Lets be serious Roundguy. Your team beat no one. Look at the crossover games and look at what Mankato and Luverne did to the team you beat.

There were some impressive teams in the tournament but I don't think your team is in that ball park. All I saw were a bunch of goons with very minimal skill. realistically Souix Falls would be the 6th best team in this tournament.

Posted: **Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:34 pm**

forreal wrote:
roundhead wrote:
old goalie85 wrote:No 3rd place game. Forest Lake never got to plat S.S.
Yeah, no concy game... that was weird. I just based it on record and goal differential.
Lets be serious Roundguy. Your team beat no one. Look at the crossover games and look at what Mankato and Luverne did to the team you beat.

There were some impressive teams in the tournament but I don't think your team is in that ball park. All I saw were a bunch of goons with very minimal skill. realistically Souix Falls would be the 6th best team in this tournament.

Edited for realistic correction purposes:
Mankato
Luverne
Kansas City
Shakopee
Forest Lake
Rochester
New Ulm
Sioux Falls

My bad. These things always look different on paper.

Posted: **Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:39 pm**

roundhead wrote:
forreal wrote:
roundhead wrote: Yeah, no concy game... that was weird. I just based it on record and goal differential.
Lets be serious Roundguy. Your team beat no one. Look at the crossover games and look at what Mankato and Luverne did to the team you beat.

There were some impressive teams in the tournament but I don't think your team is in that ball park. All I saw were a bunch of goons with very minimal skill. realistically Souix Falls would be the 6th best team in this tournament.
Edited for realistic correction purposes:
Mankato
Luverne
Kansas City
Shakopee
Forest Lake
Rochester
New Ulm
Sioux Falls

My bad. These things always look different on paper.

I figured it was a typo.

Posted: **Tue Nov 30, 2010 8:43 am**

KC was easily the better of the teams. It would be interesting to see what the other teams would have looked like after 25 games under their belt?

It is funny how people can never accept the way things played out on the ice and have to degrade anyone that finished above them. You take the way the pools were divided up and deal with it.

I would be interested to find out what you are basing the goones statement and minimal talent on. Sounds like sour grapes to me.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Mankato Thanksgiving Tourney.

Mankato Thanksgiving Tourney.

Results

Just to keep the peace...

Re: Just to keep the peace...