Page 1 of 1
Burnsville (4-1-1) vs Holy Angels (1-2) 12-29-10 5pm
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 3:34 pm
by HShockeywatcher
The last time these two met was in the 5AA 2007 Section finals, with Burnsville winning 6-4.
Since then, both teams have lost to either Jefferson or Edina in the section semifinals or finals.
Depending on the rest of the season, the winner of this game has a good shot at the #2 seed in 2AA this season.
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:06 pm
by wblhockeyfan8
Burnsville by them same score 6-4.

Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 10:49 am
by Zamman
I always vote for my team, unwritten rule is you never go against your team.
AHA has not gotten the bounces yet and need this win. I say a close one with AHA winning by one late in the third.
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 12:37 pm
by crash the net
wblhockeyfan8 wrote:Burnsville by them same score 6-4.

Burnsville should dominate at the silver level (they would be more challenged at the gold). They have strong goaltending and defense and have proven that they can put up some points on offense. Holy Angels is not the team that they have been in the past and will be beat by a score of 8-2. Burnsville rolls through their 2nd game (doesn't matter who) and ends up at the X for the championship.
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 12:52 pm
by wblhockeyfan8
crash the net wrote:wblhockeyfan8 wrote:Burnsville by them same score 6-4.

Burnsville should dominate at the silver level (they would be more challenged at the gold). They have strong goaltending and defense and have proven that they can put up some points on offense. Holy Angels is not the team that they have been in the past and will be beat by a score of 8-2. Burnsville rolls through their 2nd game (doesn't matter who) and ends up at the X for the championship.
I agree completely, 8-2 is much more realistic. I just always like to choose the previous score.
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:20 am
by D6Rocks
What's a Blaze?
What's a Co-Star?
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:37 am
by Zamman
D6Rocks wrote:What's a Blaze?
What's a Co-Star?
A Co*star is something you put a hot Tscholl on.....That is from the 70's....
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 12:31 pm
by outside_observer
The class of 1976 was the first full four-year co-ed class. Because the school was now co-ed, the Angies became the co*Stars and varsity athletics began.
Blaze - Stars
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 6:16 pm
by runninman
Any updates on this one?
Re: Blaze - Stars
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 7:25 pm
by seek & destroy
runninman wrote:Any updates on this one?
Burnsville LOST in OT 6 - 5
Stats and information available on pointstreak
http://www.pointstreak.com/players/play ... id=1478705
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:48 pm
by outside_observer
The 3 lines from Holy Angels wore out the two lines from Burnsville.
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 10:24 pm
by Zamman
wblhockeyfan8 wrote:crash the net wrote:wblhockeyfan8 wrote:Burnsville by them same score 6-4.

Burnsville should dominate at the silver level (they would be more challenged at the gold). They have strong goaltending and defense and have proven that they can put up some points on offense. Holy Angels is not the team that they have been in the past and will be beat by a score of 8-2. Burnsville rolls through their 2nd game (doesn't matter who) and ends up at the X for the championship.
I agree completely, 8-2 is much more realistic. I just always like to choose the previous score.
??
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:23 pm
by wblhockeyfan8
Zamman wrote:wblhockeyfan8 wrote:crash the net wrote:
Burnsville should dominate at the silver level (they would be more challenged at the gold). They have strong goaltending and defense and have proven that they can put up some points on offense. Holy Angels is not the team that they have been in the past and will be beat by a score of 8-2. Burnsville rolls through their 2nd game (doesn't matter who) and ends up at the X for the championship.
I agree completely, 8-2 is much more realistic. I just always like to choose the previous score.
??

Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:54 pm
by MNHockeyFan
The pollsters didn't do so great in this one...
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:20 am
by ya-man
crash the net wrote:wblhockeyfan8 wrote:Burnsville by them same score 6-4.

Burnsville should dominate at the silver level (they would be more challenged at the gold). They have strong goaltending and defense and have proven that they can put up some points on offense. Holy Angels is not the team that they have been in the past and will be beat by a score of 8-2. Burnsville rolls through their 2nd game (doesn't matter who) and ends up at the X for the championship.
I love it when they disappear when they are so wrong!
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:45 am
by starmvp
Does "crash the net" want to give us an insight on the game if he was there?
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:58 am
by Zamman
A few years back I was blasted for making an outrageous prediction, like this 8 - 2, and ended up eating crow. I know that person feels that way...
No big deal this is just high school hockey, something we all enjoy so no issues here.
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:00 pm
by starmvp
It's just all fun and games
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:01 pm
by Zamman
Earlier in the post was a question of what a Co*star was, I was a Co*star....
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:18 pm
by crash the net
ya-man wrote:crash the net wrote:wblhockeyfan8 wrote:Burnsville by them same score 6-4.

Burnsville should dominate at the silver level (they would be more challenged at the gold). They have strong goaltending and defense and have proven that they can put up some points on offense. Holy Angels is not the team that they have been in the past and will be beat by a score of 8-2. Burnsville rolls through their 2nd game (doesn't matter who) and ends up at the X for the championship.
I love it when they disappear when they are so wrong!
Not going to disappear just because things went differently then I thought. What can I say? Burnsville SHOULD have dominated the silver level but this just shows why they play the games. They didn't move the puck well and their defense let them down. You will lose whenever you play that way and they deserved what they got. Kudo's to Holy Angels for sticking with it when they were down 5-2 going into the 3rd. They kept playing hard and showed they should never be underestimated. Hopefully Burnsville will remember that when they see them in the sections.
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:33 pm
by ya-man
crash the net wrote:ya-man wrote:crash the net wrote:
Burnsville should dominate at the silver level (they would be more challenged at the gold). They have strong goaltending and defense and have proven that they can put up some points on offense. Holy Angels is not the team that they have been in the past and will be beat by a score of 8-2. Burnsville rolls through their 2nd game (doesn't matter who) and ends up at the X for the championship.
I love it when they disappear when they are so wrong!
Not going to disappear just because things went differently then I thought. What can I say? Burnsville SHOULD have dominated the silver level but this just shows why they play the games. They didn't move the puck well and their defense let them down. You will lose whenever you play that way and they deserved what they got. Kudo's to Holy Angels for sticking with it when they were down 5-2 going into the 3rd. They kept playing hard and showed they should never be underestimated. Hopefully Burnsville will remember that when they see them in the sections.
Either you underestimated the wrong team or you don't know what your talking about.