HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

1. HM
2. EP
3. MG
4. Way
5. STA
6. BSM
7. WBL
8. Blake
9. Edina
10. Mtka

Karl, you must have something wrong. WBL needs to be higher. It's in black and white in today's paper!

BodyShots wrote:1. HM
2. EP
3. MG
4. Way
5. STA
6. BSM
7. WBL
8. Blake
9. Edina
10. Mtka

Karl, you must have something wrong. WBL needs to be higher. It's in black and white in today's paper!

Just Metro rankings?

Who does these rankings? I'm a wbl fan and I don't agree that they are 7

BodyShots wrote:1. HM
2. EP
3. MG
4. Way
5. STA
6. BSM
7. WBL
8. Blake
9. Edina
10. Mtka

Karl, you must have something wrong. WBL needs to be higher. It's in black and white in today's paper!

Blake at 8? If they can't put the proper attention to it, they should not bother.

Pioneer Press rankings have always been the worst!

I'm not sure how Blake would even crack the top 20

The Pioneer Press as a whole is a joke...the Section 3A of newspapers. I love reading their 6-page sports section

brandy38 wrote:...the Section 3A of newspapers.

BodyShots wrote: Karl, you must have something wrong. WBL needs to be higher. It's in black and white in today's paper!

Well, I don't need to worry about these guys putting me out of business...

Blake could win A state and there would still be some question over whether they deserve to be in a 2-class top-10. I'm not even convinced STA belongs...

And then there's WBL.

I'm a Pioneer Press customer and have been for awhile, but when I see terrible rankings like this in my sports section, I sometimes think about getting the Star...

Don't do this to me, PP. Research your teams before printing bogus rankings like these.

Sorry WB and Blake fans, your teams are not better than Edina and Minnetonka.

PuckU126 wrote:I'm a Pioneer Press customer and have been for awhile, but when I see terrible rankings like this in my sports section, I sometimes think about getting the Star...

Don't do this to me, PP. Research your teams before printing bogus rankings like these.

Sorry WB and Blake fans, your teams are not better than Edina and Minnetonka.

The Blake ranking really does puzzle me

PuckU126 wrote:I'm a Pioneer Press customer and have been for awhile, but when I see terrible rankings like this in my sports section, I sometimes think about getting the Star...

Don't do this to me, PP. Research your teams before printing bogus rankings like these.

Sorry WB and Blake fans, your teams are not better than Edina and Minnetonka.

I agree, I have no idea what they're doing here?

wblhockeyfan8 wrote:

PuckU126 wrote:I'm a Pioneer Press customer and have been for awhile, but when I see terrible rankings like this in my sports section, I sometimes think about getting the Star...

Don't do this to me, PP. Research your teams before printing bogus rankings like these.

Sorry WB and Blake fans, your teams are not better than Edina and Minnetonka.

I agree, I have no idea what they're doing here?

I suspect alcohol was involved while making this list.

PuckU126 wrote:

wblhockeyfan8 wrote:

PuckU126 wrote:I'm a Pioneer Press customer and have been for awhile, but when I see terrible rankings like this in my sports section, I sometimes think about getting the Star...

Don't do this to me, PP. Research your teams before printing bogus rankings like these.

Sorry WB and Blake fans, your teams are not better than Edina and Minnetonka.

I agree, I have no idea what they're doing here?

I suspect alcohol was involved while making this list.

Or money...

starmvp wrote:

PuckU126 wrote:

wblhockeyfan8 wrote: I agree, I have no idea what they're doing here?

I suspect alcohol was involved while making this list.

Or money...

Money?

Doubt it. If it was the BCS and millions of dollars were on the line to play in a big time bowl, I'd give you the nod. But not for the Pioneer Press.

PuckU126 wrote:

starmvp wrote:

PuckU126 wrote: I suspect alcohol was involved while making this list.

Or money...

Money?

Doubt it. If it was the BCS and millions of dollars were on the line to play in a big time bowl, I'd give you the nod. But not for the Pioneer Press.

Trust me, I've heard stories about Pioneer Press All-State teams that would rattle you to the core....

starmvp wrote:

PuckU126 wrote:

starmvp wrote:Or money...

Money?

Doubt it. If it was the BCS and millions of dollars were on the line to play in a big time bowl, I'd give you the nod. But not for the Pioneer Press.

Trust me, I've heard stories about Pioneer Press All-State teams that would rattle you to the core....

Get on the chat room; I'll talk about it some more.

PuckU126 wrote:I'm a Pioneer Press customer and have been for awhile, but when I see terrible rankings like this in my sports section, I sometimes think about getting the Star...

Don't do this to me, PP. Research your teams before printing bogus rankings like these.

Sorry WB and Blake fans, your teams are not better than Edina and Minnetonka.

It makes perfect sense.

CDH beat Edina
Stillwater beat Tonka
and WBL won the SEC.
Why wouldn't they be ranked higher?

BodyShots wrote:

PuckU126 wrote:I'm a Pioneer Press customer and have been for awhile, but when I see terrible rankings like this in my sports section, I sometimes think about getting the Star...

Don't do this to me, PP. Research your teams before printing bogus rankings like these.

Sorry WB and Blake fans, your teams are not better than Edina and Minnetonka.

It makes perfect sense.

CDH beat Edina
Stillwater beat Tonka
and WBL won the SEC.
Why wouldn't they be ranked higher?

WBL will be able to earn that position soon in sectional play and maybe State?

Prove it!