Page 1 of 1

Bigger upset?

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 2:17 am
by longdistancespectator8
Lakeville north, a team that was awful during the regular season upsets lakeville south, and the leading scorer in the state to win section 1AA.

Hill Murray loses to a respectable White Bear Lake team in their own section final,

Which one are you more surprised by?

Personally, its the lakeville game by a very slim margin. i didnt see Lakeville North beating a better team again in the section final

Re: Bigger upset?

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 2:27 am
by HappyHockeyFan
longdistancespectator8 wrote:Lakeville north, a team that was awful during the regular season upsets lakeville south, and the leading scorer in the state to win section 1AA.

Hill Murray loses to a respectable White Bear Lake team in their own section final,

Which one are you more surprised by?

Personally, its the lakeville game by a very slim margin. i didnt see Lakeville North beating a better team again in the section final
A HOT goalie like Lindgren can take a team a long way, I dont think they will be an easy game for whoever gets them first round.

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 3:07 am
by Weekend_Warrior
Well... I think most people felt Hill-Murray were a shoe-in for the Tournament. So that seems like an obvious choice.

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:36 am
by youngblood08
Sorry, LN/LS doesn't even come close to WBL over Hill.

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 1:39 pm
by GordonBombay99
WBL upsetting Hill-Murray is a much larger upset I think.

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 1:51 pm
by karl(east)
From a strict rankings/talent/what happened in the regular season perspective, North over South is probably the bigger upset.

But with all the history between Hill and White Bear, I think I'd argue that it's the more meaningful one.

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 2:04 pm
by GordonBombay99
karl(east) wrote:From a strict rankings/talent/what happened in the regular season perspective, North over South is probably the bigger upset.

But with all the history between Hill and White Bear, I think I'd argue that it's the more meaningful one.
Espically since everyone was convinced HM was gonna beat WBL and that HM had it locked up. HM was a favorite of many to win it all this year.

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 2:22 pm
by goldy313
Hill losing to WBL.

Section 1 takes a beating and much deserved most of the time. However 2 towns make up 5 teams, no other section comes close to that and because of that it means to win the section you, more times tahn not, have to beat a crosstown team. Not since Minneapolis and St. Paul were powers was this true. You say all you want about Hill/WBL, Roseau/Moorhead, GR/East but these rivalries aren't the same as crosstown ones. These are kids who grew up playing with and against each other since mites and t-ball, went to the same schools, parents work in the same place, etc.

North beating South isn't an upset, it's the very nature of crosstown games.

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 2:49 pm
by youngblood08
goldy313 wrote:Hill losing to WBL.

Section 1 takes a beating and much deserved most of the time. However 2 towns make up 5 teams, no other section comes close to that and because of that it means to win the section you, more times tahn not, have to beat a crosstown team. Not since Minneapolis and St. Paul were powers was this true. You say all you want about Hill/WBL, Roseau/Moorhead, GR/East but these rivalries aren't the same as crosstown ones. These are kids who grew up playing with and against each other since mites and t-ball, went to the same schools, parents work in the same place, etc.

North beating South isn't an upset, it's the very nature of crosstown games.
What the heck do you think Hill/WBL is?? 5 Hill kids are from WBL and they all played against each other in youth hockey. LN beat LS as late as last season did they not? How long has there been 2 high schools in Lakeville? You could multiply the history of both lakeville teams by 10x's and still won't come close to the Hill/WBL history. 15 years ago was the last time WBL beat Hill for the Section title not to mention the regular season record was like 20-0 run for Hill. Hill beat WBL earlier in the season and has been #1 since January, was Lakeville South even ranked? And what 5 teams does Lakeville make up? I only see South and North?

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 3:06 pm
by HockeyGuy81
youngblood08 wrote:
goldy313 wrote:Hill losing to WBL.

Section 1 takes a beating and much deserved most of the time. However 2 towns make up 5 teams, no other section comes close to that and because of that it means to win the section you, more times tahn not, have to beat a crosstown team. Not since Minneapolis and St. Paul were powers was this true. You say all you want about Hill/WBL, Roseau/Moorhead, GR/East but these rivalries aren't the same as crosstown ones. These are kids who grew up playing with and against each other since mites and t-ball, went to the same schools, parents work in the same place, etc.

North beating South isn't an upset, it's the very nature of crosstown games.
What the heck do you think Hill/WBL is?? 5 Hill kids are from WBL and they all played against each other in youth hockey. LN beat LS as late as last season did they not? How long has there been 2 high schools in Lakeville? You could multiply the history of both lakeville teams by 10x's and still won't come close to the Hill/WBL history. 15 years ago was the last time WBL beat Hill for the Section title not to mention the regular season record was like 20-0 run for Hill. Hill beat WBL earlier in the season and has been #1 since January, was Lakeville South even ranked? And what 5 teams does Lakeville make up? I only see South and North?
Holy cow, settle down.

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 3:11 pm
by keepyourheadup
Karl, you nailed it.

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 3:29 pm
by MrBoDangles
15 years for the upset........ not comparable

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 3:33 pm
by easton18
youngblood08 wrote:
goldy313 wrote:Hill losing to WBL.

Section 1 takes a beating and much deserved most of the time. However 2 towns make up 5 teams, no other section comes close to that and because of that it means to win the section you, more times tahn not, have to beat a crosstown team. Not since Minneapolis and St. Paul were powers was this true. You say all you want about Hill/WBL, Roseau/Moorhead, GR/East but these rivalries aren't the same as crosstown ones. These are kids who grew up playing with and against each other since mites and t-ball, went to the same schools, parents work in the same place, etc.

North beating South isn't an upset, it's the very nature of crosstown games.
What the heck do you think Hill/WBL is?? 5 Hill kids are from WBL and they all played against each other in youth hockey. LN beat LS as late as last season did they not? How long has there been 2 high schools in Lakeville? You could multiply the history of both lakeville teams by 10x's and still won't come close to the Hill/WBL history. 15 years ago was the last time WBL beat Hill for the Section title not to mention the regular season record was like 20-0 run for Hill. Hill beat WBL earlier in the season and has been #1 since January, was Lakeville South even ranked? And what 5 teams does Lakeville make up? I only see South and North?
He said 2 towns makeup 5 teams, Rochester and Lakeville...

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:09 pm
by youngblood08
got it!


but looking at the posts, 95% thought Hill would win. Looking further into it 99% didn't care who was even playing in Section 1.

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:56 pm
by keepyourheadup
The two rows of scouts at the far end cared.

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 6:56 pm
by BearsSensGophs
Personally speaking it was WBL over Hill for me. During my whole high school career I didnt get to see us beat Hill so that was great.

Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:33 am
by PuckU126
youngblood08 wrote:got it!


but looking at the posts, 95% thought Hill would win. Looking further into it 99% didn't care who was even playing in Section 1.
Ladies and gentlemen... The truth!

8)