Page 1 of 2
Adv 17 tryout results
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 12:01 pm
by rudy
Let's try this: separate topics for Adv. 15, 16 and 17 rosters.
Here is section 2
F - Bianchi
F - Nanne
F - CJ Smith
F - Hernon
F - Meador
F - Fellner
F - Willson
F - Tapani
F - Hunter Anderson
F - Walsh
F - Colford
F - Hunt
D - Mork
D - Janco
D - Baker
D - Nelson
D - Bigaouette
D - Mostrom
G - Miller
G - Nichols
Alternates - Zins, Doerring, Weiss, Kenney
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 7:07 am
by observer
A few more of the 17 teams (94s) are now posted on the Hub.
http://www.mnhockeyhub.com/page/show/31 ... -17s-2011-
Remaining rosters
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 11:53 am
by rudy
They seem to be slow in coming. Anyone have any of the rest?
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:31 pm
by woodley
All the 16s and 17s are posted on Hockey Hub
17s
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 7:20 am
by rudy
Any surprises -- those who are there or those who aren't?
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 11:53 am
by observer
3 solid 94s from Hill Murray but no Zach Lavalle on the Section 4 team. Injured, spring break, ACT?
http://www.mnhockeyhub.com/page/show/31 ... ason=43881
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 12:03 pm
by The Best in the Bizz3
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 1:31 pm
by observer
That seems a little wierd. I'd rank him ahead of the three that did. Got any dirt? Behavior? Yelled at the Coach or something? There must be more to the story than your simple explanation.
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 3:52 pm
by The Best in the Bizz3
observer wrote:That seems a little wierd. I'd rank him ahead of the three that did. Got any dirt? Behavior? Yelled at the Coach or something? There must be more to the story than your simple explanation.
I have heard this from players who tried out for the section team. Not only does he belong in that group, but the Final 54 and possibly the National Team. There are several explanations to why he didn't make it.
1) He wanted the ice but was unable to attend this weekend
2) They wanted to give another kid a shot
3) He got hurt (doubtful)
4) He didn't bring his A game (also doubtful)
I'm assuming they wanted to give another kid a shot, but I guess we might eventually find out.
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 3:55 pm
by observer
Did not make the team
Suggests he tried out.
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 6:15 pm
by GreekChurch
I have to agree with Observer - that he should be there before the other 3 plus a few other. I heard he tried out, but got cut. To me there's got to be more to it, he has been there in the past, and to NY, not to mention a very visible season at Hill.
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:48 am
by Oldtimehockeyguy23
the advanced program is becoming ridiculous if Lavalle actually tried out and didn't make it. Kid was a stud in the ELITE league this past fall... should have been on the national team. great character kid too.
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:54 pm
by 12to14
Oldtimehockeyguy23 wrote:the advanced program is becoming ridiculous if Lavalle actually tried out and didn't make it. Kid was a stud in the ELITE league this past fall... should have been on the national team. great character kid too.
Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't you picked by how you try out and not by what you've done in prior years and during your school season??? I don't know who this Lavalle kid is but it's sounds to me he just didn't have a great try out. It's a good lesson to learn, you have to work hard if you want it.
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2011 10:15 pm
by CrashDaNET
Oldtimehockeyguy23 wrote:the advanced program is becoming ridiculous if Lavalle actually tried out and didn't make it. Kid was a stud in the ELITE league this past fall... should have been on the national team. great character kid too.
Every year some (and it is not only one) kids left off the list. That is just the way it is. This is not the first time...nor is it the last time. Anyone that is missed can only move on and except it..Right or Wrong.
And yes...He is a good player
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:43 pm
by old goalie85
What players stoodout?? I wasn't able to go to any. When do they pick the 54.
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 2:08 pm
by Jimbo99
old goalie85 wrote:When do they pick the 54.
Two hours ago.
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 2:31 pm
by trev2k1
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 3:20 pm
by old goalie85
Shattuck has 4 kids, East 3, A couple w/2. Looks like it was pretty fair.
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 4:04 pm
by puckster15
The great poliitical lovefest. 33 teams represented out of 54 spots. Maple Grove with 4 ties SSM with the most. Duluth East and BSM with 3 each. Stillwater sends a goalie who never played a game in the Advanced 17 weekend. Hill Murray sends one.
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 4:28 pm
by old goalie85
Don't forget FL w/one.[The kid never played summer hockey] So no politics w/ C.J.
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 4:59 pm
by cooper26
puckster15 wrote:The great poliitical lovefest. 33 teams represented out of 54 spots. Maple Grove with 4 ties SSM with the most. Duluth East and BSM with 3 each. Stillwater sends a goalie who never played a game in the Advanced 17 weekend. Hill Murray sends one.
That's about the distribution I'd expect. Why do you think it should be different? And, I can't imagine too many people arguing about the goalie that didn't play - most would say he's easily top two if not the best picked. Do you really believe they should throw out everything that's known about a kid coming in??!!
54
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:00 pm
by rudy
For those who attended, I'd be interested to hear from people about how teams performed in the Festival and how that squares with how many players those teams advanced.
Should the section teams' success even be a factor? Just cuz a team performs poorly in the W-L columns, that doesn't mean there aren't six or more worthy Final 54s on that roster, or should that tell evaluators something?
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:04 pm
by puckhead21
Forest Lake's CJ was All Conference in Football as running back AND All Conference in Hockey this year. He turned down Fall Elite 1 hockey to be a real multi-sport athlete. He is a rare bread now days. Just imagine how good he would be if he just focused on hockey 9 to 12 months a year. FYI, I'm not a relative or family friend of CJ, I just respect his athletic talent and balls to be a multi-sport athlete and not follow the desparate crowd.
Re: 54
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:05 pm
by cooper26
rudy wrote:For those who attended, I'd be interested to hear from people about how teams performed in the Festival and how that squares with how many players those teams advanced.
Should the section teams' success even be a factor? Just cuz a team goes 0-3 doesnt mean there aren't six or more worthy Final 54s, or should that tell evaluators something?
I think it should probably be skewed slightly less than it is but the concept is good. They all know team success is important and play harder and smarter because of it.
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:10 pm
by Jimbo99
puckhead21 wrote:Forest Lake's CJ was All Conference in Football as running back AND All Conference in Hockey this year. He turned down Fall Elite 1 hockey to be a real multi-sport athlete. He is a rare bread now days. Just imagine how good he would be if he just focused on hockey 9 to 12 months a year. FYI, I'm not a relative or family friend of CJ, I just respect his athletic talent and balls to be a multi-sport athlete and not follow the desparate crowd.
One successful multi-sport athlete (regardless of bread or breed) does not define everyone else as desperate (or desparate).