Little Falls vs. Marshall at Mariucci
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 11:20 am
4-3 after the 2nd period in favor of Little Falls
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
Yeah, how do your words taste? Especially when you run your mouth and don't back it up.defense wrote:Huh, Little Falls won a game......interesting.....
Though I am not sure that this is true, ill assume u are referring to a post I made on the lf v FF section final thread. That one time that I supposedly bashed little falls this year was a sarcastic response to an idiot who runs around writing ridiculous posts about lf.dherman8 wrote:Yeah, how do your words taste? Especially when you run your mouth and don't back it up.defense wrote:Huh, Little Falls won a game......interesting.....
Yeah, northern guy has some issues. But for future reference it's good to not skimp on those smiley faces when you're not serious. Too many people on here like saying those things and then tooting their own horn when it happens. I didn't see any hint of sarcasm and it seems you left it open so you could say you were right either way. In no way was it an attack. It was just calling it out. You're a smart guy you should be able to see that. Even if you try to undermine me in a sneaky manner like that the help against the northern guy argument is always appreciated. My view won't change either.defense wrote:Though I am not sure that this is true, ill assume u are referring to a post I made on the lf v FF section final thread. That one time that I supposedly bashed little falls this year was a sarcastic response to an idiot who runs around writing ridiculous posts about lf.dherman8 wrote:Yeah, how do your words taste? Especially when you run your mouth and don't back it up.defense wrote:Huh, Little Falls won a game......interesting.....
in all actuality my words taste great because I said that both Marshall and Breck would lose their second games...that post was in the dm v Breck thread, before that game or lfs first game started.
please pay attention to who u r attacking....because I have not run my mouth about how bad lf is and how they don't deserve to be there. That was lots of others..keep reaching though, my image of lf people can always change.
OK..it's cool, didn't try to undermine anyone. Thought the sunglasses smiley face was enough. I was trying to jab at those hatters of the "weak" sections..didn't have time or energy to spell it out to them....dherman8 wrote:Yeah, northern guy has some issues. But for future reference it's good to not skimp on those smiley faces when you're not serious. Too many people on here like saying those things and then tooting their own horn when it happens. I didn't see any hint of sarcasm and it seems you left it open so you could say you were right either way. In no way was it an attack it was just calling it out. You're a smart guy you should be able to see that. Even if you try to undermine me in a sneaky manner like that the help against the northern guy argument is always appreciated.defense wrote:Though I am not sure that this is true, ill assume u are referring to a post I made on the lf v FF section final thread. That one time that I supposedly bashed little falls this year was a sarcastic response to an idiot who runs around writing ridiculous posts about lf.dherman8 wrote: Yeah, how do your words taste? Especially when you run your mouth and don't back it up.
in all actuality my words taste great because I said that both Marshall and Breck would lose their second games...that post was in the dm v Breck thread, before that game or lfs first game started.
please pay attention to who u r attacking....because I have not run my mouth about how bad lf is and how they don't deserve to be there. That was lots of others..keep reaching though, my image of lf people can always change.
Now I do. After your post in the lf/ff thread I told my view of it. I was leery at first because I figured they're toughest consolation game would be against the team in the loser bracket that wasn't going to be Lourdes or New Ulm. We'll see I guess.defense wrote:OK..it's cool, didn't try to undermine anyone. Thought the sunglasses smiley face was enough. I was trying to jab at those hatters of the "weak" sections..didn't have time or energy to spell it out to them....dherman8 wrote:Yeah, northern guy has some issues. But for future reference it's good to not skimp on those smiley faces when you're not serious. Too many people on here like saying those things and then tooting their own horn when it happens. I didn't see any hint of sarcasm and it seems you left it open so you could say you were right either way. In no way was it an attack it was just calling it out. You're a smart guy you should be able to see that. Even if you try to undermine me in a sneaky manner like that the help against the northern guy argument is always appreciated.defense wrote: Though I am not sure that this is true, ill assume u are referring to a post I made on the lf v FF section final thread. That one time that I supposedly bashed little falls this year was a sarcastic response to an idiot who runs around writing ridiculous posts about lf.
in all actuality my words taste great because I said that both Marshall and Breck would lose their second games...that post was in the dm v Breck thread, before that game or lfs first game started.
please pay attention to who u r attacking....because I have not run my mouth about how bad lf is and how they don't deserve to be there. That was lots of others..keep reaching though, my image of lf people can always change.
Think LF will take the consolation???
Agreed. How did Peterson play today?rainier wrote:Come on, Toppers. Hibbing, Virginia, and I-Falls all beat LF this year. I can see not beating Breck, but you should be able to beat LF. (I'm not saying LF is bad, just that DM led me to believe they were a better team than this.)
Whoa, whoa, whoa. I like bashing DM? I rooted for the Toppers and only said I was disappointed they lost to LF. DM was ranked in the top 5 for most of the season, should I not have expected them to beat an unranked opponent that 3 other 7A teams beat?Hockey North wrote:D Marshall runs 5 D men.
Marshall was up 1-0 when Hanowski blast Marshall's #1 D from behind.
It was an obvious blatant checking from behind penalty.
Refs hand out a 5 minute Boarding call. Thats it.
Hanowski should have gotten 5 minutes and a 10 and game for that hit.
Marshall D man leaves game with separated shoulder.
Hanowski gets out of the box and ends up scoring 2 goals
That basically sums it up.
Rainier just likes bashing this DM team when he never knows the facts.
I'm dealing with it just fine. The memory from last season of my team upsetting the #3 seed and not going 2 and out like Marshall did this year keeps me warm at night. Way to represent 7A.Hockey North wrote:Rainier
Your team didnt make it to the show.![]()
Deal with it.
4-5 of the best East BNA's going to Marshall next year. Flaherty was at several of their division games watching from the corner. It was kind of weird to see that.rainier wrote:I'm dealing with it just fine. The memory from last season of my team upsetting the #3 seed and not going 2 and out like Marshall did this year keeps me warm at night. Way to represent 7A.Hockey North wrote:Rainier
Your team didnt make it to the show.![]()
Deal with it.
With the top recruits from all over Duluth piling in to Marshall, it should be a good run for your team over the next few years, especially if Breck and STA opt up. Then you can make sure the flame of private school sandbagging in Class A never dies.
My original "criticism" was that I found it disappointing Marshall didn't beat LF in the consolation bracket. Hockey North took that to mean I was bashing Marshall. What Marshall fan doesn't think they underachieved as a whole at the tourney? (Many thought they underachieved in the 7A playoffs, despite winning it.)HShockeyupnorth wrote:Why is it weird for him to view 4-5 Bantam A's that are already 8th-9th grade students at Marshall? It actually may be more like 6-7 Ban A's that have declared Marshall.
And Ranier: In recent memory, Marshall had a stretch of 4 consecutive years placing 3rd or 2nd at State, also sending countless kids on to D-1 Hockey. Most recently, Peterson, who flourished at the school.
So what's with the criticism of Marshall?