Page 1 of 1
Moorhead/Roseville
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 6:57 pm
by WarroadWarrior
Deitz Puts moorhead up by 1 on the powerplay with 3:30 or so to play in the first <p></p><i></i>
Re: Moorhead/Roseville
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:04 pm
by CoachGuy
What a bogus call. Roseville got the shaft on that one <p></p><i></i>
Re: Moorhead/Roseville
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 9:00 pm
by PuckRanger
Clank! <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :eek --><img src=
http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eek.gif ALT=":eek"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>Too bad for Roseville. I think they might've hung on if that didn't happened. <p></p><i></i>
extra bouncy?
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 9:51 pm
by KnightTime36
I agree that Nitskorski's goal was a little iffy, but roseville's second goal was ridiculous too. the puck kept bouncing straight back up over the net. what was up with that, I've never seen that happen before?<br><br>And you can't say Moorhead didnt deserve this one.<br><br>Jordy's goal at the end was incredible, a great combination of hard work and talent.<br><br>What it is... It's Knight Time Baby!!! <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=
http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... tTime36</A> at: 12/27/05 9:55 pm<br></i>
Re: extra bouncy?
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:01 pm
by wukwinn
Final Score? <p>Wuk Winn<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="
http://img373.imageshack.us/img373/6633 ... <!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br>Go Jefferson Jaguars!<br>Go Austin Lee!</p><i></i>
Re: extra bouncy?
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:13 pm
by KnightTime36
3-2 Moorhead<br><br>Jordy Christian with the short-handed game winner <p>What it is... Its Knight Time Baby!!!</p><i></i>
Re: extra bouncy?
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:14 pm
by KnightTime36
One more thing.<br><br>I saw that Jake Krause was on the ice for warm-ups but then did not play at all. anybody have the scoop on him? <p>What it is... Its Knight Time Baby!!!</p><i></i>
Re: extra bouncy?
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:39 pm
by newSPUDfan
He was supposed to play tonight. Must have been a game day decision. Or they decided it wasn't worth the risk. <p></p><i></i>
Re: extra bouncy?
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 11:33 pm
by GoGophers2005
I have noticed through the years that Morinville often lets his curt players skate in warm ups but then they sit for the game. I think he does this just to let the kid get some ice time. Keep him warm. Krause suffered a pretty bad concusion against East from what the commentary said. <p></p><i></i>
Re: extra bouncy?
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:48 am
by SolanumTuberosum
Anyone else get a kick out of the interview with the Roseville kid after the 2nd period?<br><br>"ummmmmmmmm i scored and im uhhh only a sophomore" "I'm uhh a sophomore but i helped out in this win here" "ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm we need to get more shots and umm yeah" <p></p><i></i>
Re: extra bouncy?
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:50 am
by SolanumTuberosum
I also liked Pat Deitz's quote "we haven't played a game in 10 games" <p></p><i></i>
Re: extra bouncy?
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2005 12:34 pm
by sfg16
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>but roseville's second goal was ridiculous too. the puck kept bouncing straight back up over the net. what was up with that, I've never seen that happen before?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>This seemed to be happening a lot in warm ups i saw. There were a couple of chances for both teams after high shots deflecting right back in front of the net. Must be something with the X's glass. <br>I thought teams played pretty well, some costly mistakes. Moorhead should of won the game, and they did. Although Moorhead's second goal didn't go in, to me. Looked as though it hit the crossbar nd shot back out. They played a replay on the big screen and the roseville coaches were very upset with the call after seeing the replay. <p></p><i></i>
roseville vs. moorhead
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:06 pm
by ae42
that goal hit the crossbar, but at the game it looked like it went in 'cause those pipes don't make a sound. when we saw it on video replay it was clear that the puck did not go in. Roseville got screwed! <p></p><i></i>
extra bouncy
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:13 pm
by ae42
RV's second goal was wierd, but at least it went in the net <p></p><i></i>
Re: Moorhead/Roseville
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:16 pm
by ae42
roseville had good coaching, wait until they get mike dorr back <p></p><i></i>
Re: sophomore interview
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2005 2:29 pm
by KnightTime36
Are you saying that Roseville would have won if they had Mike Dorr? <p>What it is... Its Knight Time Baby!!!</p><i></i>
Dorr
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 7:34 am
by One Smooth Operator
When is he coming back? Why is he out? <p></p><i></i>
Re: Dorr
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 7:58 am
by wbmd
Supposedly he is back within two weeks. Hand injury. <p></p><i></i>