4AA SEMIFINALS #4 ROSEVILLE VS #1 HILL-MURRAY
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 11:49 pm
Could be better than it appears on paper.
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
Because?wbmd wrote:Could be better than it appears on paper.
Because Hill Murray folks go in with big heads and sometimes lose to teams that they shouldn't.Pioneerprideguy wrote:Because?wbmd wrote:Could be better than it appears on paper.
I can accept that. Although, history has shown they haven't lost too many times in sections and rarely outside of the finals.MrBoDangles wrote:Because Hill Murray folks go in with big heads and sometimes lose to teams that they shouldn't.Pioneerprideguy wrote:Because?wbmd wrote:Could be better than it appears on paper.
Which players and/or coaches do you know personally? Curious to hear who goes in with big heads?MrBoDangles wrote:Because Hill Murray folks go in with big heads and sometimes lose to teams that they shouldn't.Pioneerprideguy wrote:Because?wbmd wrote:Could be better than it appears on paper.
Good news is the last two state titles for HM were good, not great teams. I'm not expecting it this year, but wouldn't be surprised either. I don't think they'll have any trouble with Roseville either. Friday is coming and I don't think any natural event could stop a WBL v HM section final to close the coliseum. Too much karma on hand for that to happen.Pioneerprideguy wrote:I can accept that. Although, history has shown they haven't lost too many times in sections and rarely outside of the finals.MrBoDangles wrote:Because Hill Murray folks go in with big heads and sometimes lose to teams that they shouldn't.Pioneerprideguy wrote: Because?
This is not a great HM team and those close to the program realize this. But this is a good team in a year without any dominant teams. I will be surprised if HM struggles with Roseville. I see them rolling all 3 lines and winning by 4. Nothing fancy, just advancing.
If they go in as cocky as some of the Hill fans on here.BlueLineSpecial wrote:Which players and/or coaches do you know personally? Curious to hear who goes in with big heads?MrBoDangles wrote:Because Hill Murray folks go in with big heads and sometimes lose to teams that they shouldn't.Pioneerprideguy wrote: Because?
It's hard to be humble when you're as great as I amMrBoDangles wrote:If they go in as cocky as some of the Hill fans on here.BlueLineSpecial wrote:Which players and/or coaches do you know personally? Curious to hear who goes in with big heads?MrBoDangles wrote: Because Hill Murray folks go in with big heads and sometimes lose to teams that they shouldn't.
Cassius did not attend Hill.BlueLineSpecial wrote:
It's hard to be humble when you're as great as I am
-Muhammad Ali
Oh he didn't attend Hill? Gee then I guess my post was irrelevant, trolling, and stupid. Well one of our posts was anywayelliott70 wrote:Cassius did not attend Hill.BlueLineSpecial wrote:
It's hard to be humble when you're as great as I am
-Muhammad Ali
Nor any private school.
Just added manic with the cocky....BlueLineSpecial wrote:Oh he didn't attend Hill? Gee then I guess my post was irrelevant, trolling, and stupid. Well one of our posts was anywayelliott70 wrote:Cassius did not attend Hill.BlueLineSpecial wrote:
It's hard to be humble when you're as great as I am
-Muhammad Ali
Nor any private school.
It's a good bet none of them are from the Hill youth program!badgermom78 wrote:What associations are the Hill players from?
I believe 3rd graders who start playing in a community youth association hockey program should sign a contract that legally binds them to attend the local public high school. As the years go by they can only be released from that contract if they're not very good. (Of course this rule would have stopped TJ Oshie from going to Warroad.)inthetwine wrote:It's a good bet none of them are from the Hill youth program!badgermom78 wrote:What associations are the Hill players from?
They always look great to most of us that aren't "close"..... It's why we give ya a extra dose of ribbing.Pioneerprideguy wrote:I can accept that. Although, history has shown they haven't lost too many times in sections and rarely outside of the finals.MrBoDangles wrote:Because Hill Murray folks go in with big heads and sometimes lose to teams that they shouldn't.Pioneerprideguy wrote: Because?
This is not a great HM team and those close to the program realize this. But this is a good team in a year without any dominant teams. I will be surprised if HM struggles with Roseville. I see them rolling all 3 lines and winning by 4. Nothing fancy, just advancing.
WBL, Stillwater and Roseville High Schools also do not have youth programs. The communities of WBL, Stillwater and Roseville do.inthetwine wrote:It's a good bet none of them are from the Hill youth program!badgermom78 wrote:What associations are the Hill players from?
Like every other team having a good season and lose in an upset?MrBoDangles wrote:Because Hill Murray folks go in with big heads and sometimes lose to teams that they shouldn't.Pioneerprideguy wrote:Because?wbmd wrote:Could be better than it appears on paper.
Is this a serious suggestion or am I just sluggish from the girls tourney...stpaul wrote:I believe 3rd graders who start playing in a community youth association hockey program should sign a contract that legally binds them to attend the local public high school. As the years go by they can only be released from that contract if they're not very good. (Of course this rule would have stopped TJ Oshie from going to Warroad.)inthetwine wrote:It's a good bet none of them are from the Hill youth program!badgermom78 wrote:What associations are the Hill players from?
You're extremely-sluggish in comprehending all the posts above.....Nevertoomuchhockey wrote:Is this a serious suggestion or am I just sluggish from the girls tourney...stpaul wrote:I believe 3rd graders who start playing in a community youth association hockey program should sign a contract that legally binds them to attend the local public high school. As the years go by they can only be released from that contract if they're not very good. (Of course this rule would have stopped TJ Oshie from going to Warroad.)inthetwine wrote: It's a good bet none of them are from the Hill youth program!
Thank you. This is the truth. Bill Lechner (boys hockey & baseball), Bill Schafhauser (girls hockey), Erin Herman (girls basketball) and Dick Ghizone (boys basketball) and most of the coaches at Hill-Murray are there and in the school building full-time. This also goes for band & theatre kids and their directors. The school is small enough (800 or so in 6 grades) that they know everbody. They interact with the kids during the day and all year. They are great role models. Kids know they better be at school, behaving and doing well in class to play. I don't think you have to get skewered for saying this out loud but agree you probably will.mnhockfan99 wrote:I'm gonna get skewered here but I know quite a few of the HM players from recent years, I've found them to be great kids from great families. Having a relative just finish playing HS last weekend at a public school with a 'two hour a day coach' who taught him nothing in three years and had no goals or standards for the program, I can't argue with kids who want better.