Senior Classic
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 4:38 pm
Starts Friday -- are rosters posted somewhere?
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
Www.mghca.comNevertoomuchhockey wrote:Ive never heard about this before. Excuse my questions, but...
Don't these seniors already have college plans, hockey or no? Who are they "showcasing" for?
Rosters?
Thanks.
No surprise that 6A/6AA was strong, but I see that the other Hinterland team (8A/8AA) did not fare so well, scoring only 3 goals in going winless in their four games. Probably one of the reasons why is that the two best teams in the Northwest - East Grand Forks and Thief River Falls - each had young rosters, with most of their top players coming back next year.powerplayer wrote:Have to put a plug in for the Hinterland7AA and 7A girls took third place only losing to 6AA and 6A (best section in the state with 7 D1 players on the roster) in overtime!!! Probably the best hockey I have watched all year. Very proud of our Northern Girls!!!
Looking at the rosters it would appear few have. Nobody from Minnetonka, Hopkins (really bizarre) or Lakeville South? One girl from EP, two from Edina but 6 from Bloomington? One girl from Lakeville N but three from Rochester Century?Nevertoomuchhockey wrote:Ive never heard about this before.
Sydney Baldwin from Minnetonka played but I heard she signed up late and they had to put her with another section team since 6 was filled already.luckyEPDad wrote:Looking at the rosters it would appear few have. Nobody from Minnetonka, Hopkins (really bizarre) or Lakeville South? One girl from EP, two from Edina but 6 from Bloomington? One girl from Lakeville N but three from Rochester Century?Nevertoomuchhockey wrote:Ive never heard about this before.
Benilde and Armstrong/Cooper are well represented though.
Geez Otter, other than you who's hyperventilating? I think the Senior Classic is overlooked by a lot of girls, quite possibly because of its timing. I'm guessing the strong representation by some teams has a lot to do with how tied in the head coach is. Not political ties, but just having an awareness of the program and remembering to nominate players in time.Otter wrote:Geez, people, stop hyperventilating and move along. There's nothing to see here. It's a chance for the kids who've been playing with and against each other for 10 years to have one more weekend to play with and against each other. A kid I know said it was the most fun she's had playing hockey since early last summer. There's no pressure (like the HS season) and no judgemental adults watching and whispering (like Advanced or Prospects or Elite). Just some family in the stands and a bunch of kids wheeling dealing and having fun. I suppose somebody on this forum is wanting stats to break down. Yeesh. The girls understood and had a blast for once. The only sign of 'officialness' was a coupla local college coaches stopping in to watch their recruits and say Hi.
I suppose that's true. Many girls are starting their spring sports and it would certainly be understandable if others are ready to take a break from hockey. That doesn't explain how clumpy some of the rosters are though.hockeywild7 wrote:It's not that players are forgotten, many times they choose not to play in this event for various reasons.
Hopkins had its banquet on Sunday morning/afternoon so they couldn’t really participate. Just a scheduling conflict and not a slight on the event, I know it is supported by coaches and players but they didn’t want to no show for the Sunday games.luckyEPDad wrote:I suppose that's true. Many girls are starting their spring sports and it would certainly be understandable if others are ready to take a break from hockey. That doesn't explain how clumpy some of the rosters are though.hockeywild7 wrote:It's not that players are forgotten, many times they choose not to play in this event for various reasons.