Page 1 of 1

Section 2AA 2006

Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2006 3:40 pm
by ghshockeyfan
1/29 KRACH says:<br><br>SEC&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp TEAM&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp RATING&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp SOS&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp SOS VAL<br>1&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp Roseville&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 414.156&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 6&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 32.609<br>2&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp Henry Sibley&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 147.243&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 31&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 43.870<br>3&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp St. Paul Blades&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 87.060&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 68&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 66.476<br>4&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp Hill-Murray Pioneers&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 51.413&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 3&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 30.435<br>5&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp Hastings&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 37.623&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 18&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 38.174<br>6&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp Woodbury&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 8.022&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 19&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 38.773<br>7&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp Park of Cottage Grove&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 5.039&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 10&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 35.667<br>8&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp Tartan&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 0.463&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 123&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp 107.000 <p></p><i></i>

Re: Section 2AA 2006

Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 11:50 am
by stphockey
I think head to head should count for something and the St. Paul Blades beat Sibley 3-2 in a match up at the Burnsville tournament - how Sibley would be put ahead of them is beyond me! <p></p><i></i>

Re: Section 2AA 2006

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 2:23 pm
by ghshockeyfan
this is what I heard:<br><br>1) Roseville<br>2) Sibley<br>3) Blades<br>4) Hastings<br>5) Hill<br>6) Woodbury<br>7) Park<br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START 8) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/glasses.gif ALT="8)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> Tartan <p></p><i></i>

Re: Section 2AA 2006

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:59 pm
by ghshockeyfan
Krach Said:<br><br>Roseville<br>Henry Sibley<br>St. Paul Blades<br>Hill-Murray Pioneers<br>Hastings<br>Woodbury<br>Park of Cottage Grove<br>Tartan<br><br><br>Hastings & Hill is debatable as HM has played amazing SOS & Hastings wasn't full strength the first part of the year so results are skewed... <p></p><i></i>

Re: Section 2AA 2006

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:34 pm
by xk1
Just posted on MSHSL...<br><br>1 Roseville<br>2 Sibley<br>3 Blades<br>4 Hastings<br>5 Hill-Murray<br>6 Woodbury<br>7 Park<br>8 Tartan<br><br> <p></p><i></i>