Page 1 of 1

Sartell bantam a

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 12:06 pm
by icebb1
what do you guys think of the sartell bantam a team? <p></p><i></i>

Re: Sartell bantam a

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:57 pm
by MnHockeyguy06
Not very good at all. They have no body. People, please stop making threads about your own team when you are no good. If you are good, go for it. But if you arent, just dont even bother! <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... eyguy06</A> at: 1/22/06 1:58 pm<br></i>

Re: Sartell Bantam A

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:21 pm
by STCplaya18
They aren't that great. Low Middle Class team. <p></p><i></i>

Re: Sartell Bantam A

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 1:20 pm
by icebb1
what are you guys talking about? they beat alex and tied buffalo, a game in which buffalo was outplayed.Did alex not beat moorehead? dont get all upset that someone just wants to know what people think of a team that feels like they have a chance to play with most teams. im not saying that we would beat edina or orono but we can compete with teams like buffalo, alex, little falls and teams that they have beaten.<br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... >icebb1</A> at: 1/23/06 1:42 pm<br></i>

Re: Sartell Bantam A

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:04 pm
by MNLIGHT39
Buffalo lost 4-1 to Hibbing who orono just beat 8-2 last weekend. Buffalo isnt anything special. But Sartell im sure is a pretty decent team for D5. <p></p><i></i>

Re: Sartell Bantam A

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 4:46 pm
by KingNipes7
Never heard of Sartell <p></p><i></i>

re:never heard of sartell

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 7:19 pm
by icebb1
small town just north of st cloud <p></p><i></i>

sartell

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:25 pm
by hockeygy807
they're pretty good..., except them to do some damage <p></p><i></i>

Re: sartell

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:34 pm
by thibert0
When did Alex beat Moorhead...? <p></p><i></i>

Re: sartell

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:44 pm
by soup3
you cant base a team on the scores of the teams they beat other games. if you beat alex, great. if alex beat moorhead good for alex. that doesnt mean at all that you would beat moorhead. if you thinks that you can base a team on other scores then sartell is not good at all. they tied willmar. willmar is not good at all. i predict a 0-2 in regions for them.<br><br><br><br><!--EZCODE HR START--><hr /><!--EZCODE HR END-->I am the <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE START--><span style="text-decoration:underline">soup</span><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE END--></strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->erstar. <p></p><i></i>

Re: Sartell bantam a

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:47 am
by Frozen Four
Buffalo dismantled Sartell 6-1 in first meeting and was missing two of their best players for second game....Alex outplayed Sartell badly and so did LF...I would say New Prague should not have any trouble with them at all... <p></p><i></i>

Re: Sartell bantam a

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 8:05 am
by Buffpuck
Sartell is a great athletic city with tradition...and their teams are always competitive...Their program is young but progressivly getting better each day. This team is strange but if they come to play they are definately physical and can create problems for smaller forwards...I had them as the second best team in d5.. <p></p><i></i>

RE:sartell bantam a

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 6:46 pm
by icebb1
buffpuck you are absolutely correct with what you just said there. The 1st time they saw Buffalo they were on the last of 3 games that weekend, losing to alex, 3-2( alex scored w/just 50 sec left, and beating Monticello 4-1.the other point is that at that point in the season they had been practicing for only 1 week. Truthfully they should have finished second in the district. Ties to MAML and Willmar really hurt them. They just weren't on the top of their game for those 2 games.If they come to play all i can say is WATCH OUT!!! <p></p><i></i>

Re: RE:sartell bantam a

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 6:56 pm
by jellytime13
OK sartell really blows, they are terrible, and they have no standouts wut so ever <p></p><i></i>

Re: RE:sartell bantam a

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 7:55 pm
by falkster09
Standouts dont matter, the only thing that matters is the score on the scoreboard. <p>Falkster</p><i></i>

Re: RE:sartell bantam a

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 10:06 pm
by soup3
im sorry but if you tied MAML and willmar thats kinda embarresing. New prauge should handle them.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><!--EZCODE HR START--><hr /><!--EZCODE HR END-->I am the <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE START--><span style="text-decoration:underline">soup</span><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE END--></strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->erstar. <p></p><i></i>

Re: RE:sartell bantam a

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 10:09 pm
by ApolloEagle39
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr> OK sartell really blows, they are terrible, and they have no standouts wut so ever<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

Re: Sartell bantam a

Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 4:12 pm
by sabrehockey
first off i will agree that a few of those ties were embarrasing. sartell should put those behind them because they are playing solid right through districts. the fact is that you will not play your A game every day and you need to play solid in regions or you will go home. all im saying is the silver region should be close. sartell may not have standouts like fink but they can play tough if they PLAY AS TEAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br><br>predictions<br>buffalo vs albert lea<br>owatonna vs crow river<br>new prague vs sartell<br>hutch vs mankato <p></p><i></i>

RE:Frozen Four

Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 5:09 pm
by icebb1
i want to know if you were at the game in which sartell beat alex. sorry that was a stupid question. obviously not because if you were you would not have made such a comment as "alex outplayed sartell badly and so did LF. First of all sartell led 3-1 for a lot of the game against LF. <p></p><i></i>