HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Posted: **Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:31 pm**

I know that the election for President is pretty far off in the distance but now seems as good as any other time to start throwing around some predicitons.

These are the people most likely to gain their party nomination.

Stupid Poll Hillary should have been on there too. Consider her a write in candidate.

[note: Wild, I added her as an obvious option--Lee]

Posted: **Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:50 pm**

boblee (I)

Posted: **Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:53 pm**

Pawlenty? C'mon.

Posted: **Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:07 pm**

Hey Boblee,

Now you sound like a political represenative. Below we covered this already on the "who is" subject.

HAVING SECOND THOUGHTS??????????????????

boblee
Joined: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 4352
Location: Minnesota
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 12:21 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stealth wrote:
Here is what Boblee looking for!

Boblee for President

Get us your campaing chairs number so we can send some cash!

First order of business would be bring back the Mighty Ducks Funding?

Would you be a little tords a Jesse?

No, No running for President here...Not my Forte.

Posted: **Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:09 pm**

Your missing Hillary Clinton

Posted: **Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:12 pm**

Stealth wrote:Hey Boblee,

Now you sound like a political represenative. Below we covered this already on the "who is" subject.

HAVING SECOND THOUGHTS??????????????????

boblee
Joined: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 4352
Location: Minnesota
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 12:21 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stealth wrote:
Here is what Boblee looking for!

Boblee for President

Get us your campaing chairs number so we can send some cash!

First order of business would be bring back the Mighty Ducks Funding?

Would you be a little tords a Jesse?

No, No running for President here...Not my Forte.

I have had a change in vision.

Posted: **Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:59 pm**

Take you anyday over publicity Hillary. I think we will see her charming face plastered like goody two shoes. Cannot control a marrage, how is she going to control a country?

Her whole campaing will be run out of Hollywood $$$$$$$$$$$$.

Posted: **Fri Jan 26, 2007 4:56 pm**

None of the above; Rudolph Giuliani.

He's been getting $100,000 a speech and now he's giving them for free. You can't get paid for political speeches, it's illegal so why turn down a 100 grand twice this weekend?

Posted: **Fri Jan 26, 2007 5:26 pm**

State Champ 97 wrote:Pawlenty? C'mon.

Pawlenty actually has decided not to run, but my money is on McCain for president and he will pick Pawlenty as his vice president. Guiliani doesn't stand a chance. For one he is not even a Republican yet he is running as one.

Posted: **Fri Jan 26, 2007 6:16 pm**

Wild4hockey wrote:
State Champ 97 wrote:Pawlenty? C'mon.
Pawlenty actually has decided not to run, but my money is on McCain for president and he will pick Pawlenty as his vice president. Guiliani doesn't stand a chance. For one he is not even a Republican yet he is running as one.

Why would you vote republican

Posted: **Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:39 pm**

PASTRAPIDSFAN wrote:
Wild4hockey wrote:
State Champ 97 wrote:Pawlenty? C'mon.
Pawlenty actually has decided not to run, but my money is on McCain for president and he will pick Pawlenty as his vice president. Guiliani doesn't stand a chance. For one he is not even a Republican yet he is running as one.
Why would you vote republican

Simple; because the Liberals are to blame for every woe facing America today. I mean, ask any Republican. How could this possibly be disputed?

As soon as I can reconcile that against the past seven years of a Republican President/House/Senate, more will be revealed.

Lee

Posted: **Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:46 pm**

east hockey wrote:
PASTRAPIDSFAN wrote:
Wild4hockey wrote: Pawlenty actually has decided not to run, but my money is on McCain for president and he will pick Pawlenty as his vice president. Guiliani doesn't stand a chance. For one he is not even a Republican yet he is running as one.
Why would you vote republican
Simple; because the Liberals are to blame for every woe facing America today. I mean, ask any Republican. How could this possibly be disputed?

As soon as I can reconcile that against the past seven years of a Republican President/House/Senate, more will be revealed.
Lee you got me confused now.

Lee

Posted: **Sat Jan 27, 2007 10:12 am**

PASTRAPIDSFAN wrote:Why would you vote republican

PASTRAPIDSFAN...that was almost as dumb of a comment as when you said Tech was the best team in the Central Lakes Conference.

That'd be like me asking the Dems why they would vote Democrat. If everyone in the world was a democrat, the world would be a mess. If everyone in the world would be a republican, same story. The two different viewpoints are a necessity to have some control over humanity.

Posted: **Sat Jan 27, 2007 10:24 am**

George Blanda wrote:
PASTRAPIDSFAN wrote:Why would you vote republican
PASTRAPIDSFAN...that was almost as dumb of a comment as when you said Tech was the best team in the Central Lakes Conference.

That'd be like me asking the Dems why they would vote Democrat. If everyone in the world was a democrat, the world would be a mess. If everyone in the world would be a republican, same story. The two different viewpoints are a necessity to have some control over humanity.

Thats why we have the partys for a new change,And nows a time for a change.Ya as for tech it should have been L.falls Imay have responed for tech because the beat brainerd I must have been on poyte .My bad

Posted: **Sat Jan 27, 2007 11:20 pm**

It is way too early to be concerned about our next President. However, unfortunately there are a few potential candidates in this country more concerned with themselves (and their party) attaining power, than our national defense. So get used to the political bantering for the next two years (pathetic!) as the liberal media will certainly ablige.

Thank God we have a president in power with priorities in order, and the backbone to stand up to principles even though many in this country are wavering. Can't walk away from this war people, this isn't Vietnam, these people are serious,....serious enough to fly our airplanes into two of our large buildings,....remember.

I thank God every day for our President. Hopefully, there is a capable replacement. Quite frankly, there is only one name in the above list, even worthy of consideration,.....hopefully a capable candidate will emerge in the next two years.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2007 4:10 pm**

this poll only came 18 months too early. no one cares

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:12 pm**

...if no one cared...no one would have commented nor voted on it.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:18 pm**

George Blanda wrote:...if no one cared...no one would have commented nor voted on it.

This man speaks the truth

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:05 pm**

Knowlzee wrote:It is way too early to be concerned about our next President. However, unfortunately there are a few potential candidates in this country more concerned with themselves (and their party) attaining power, than our national defense. So get used to the political bantering for the next two years (pathetic!) as the liberal media will certainly ablige.

Thank God we have a president in power with priorities in order, and the backbone to stand up to principles even though many in this country are wavering. Can't walk away from this war people, this isn't Vietnam, these people are serious,....serious enough to fly our airplanes into two of our large buildings,....remember.

I thank God every day for our President. Hopefully, there is a capable replacement. Quite frankly, there is only one name in the above list, even worthy of consideration,.....hopefully a capable candidate will emerge in the next two years.

I am in your court - although I do admit there has been mistakes made in regard to this war but it needs to be seen through to completion. It is no where near in comparison to Vietnam. If anything the best comparision is found in what Clinton created in Bosnia except he didn't have the courage to call it what it was. Although Iraq was not directly responsible for 9/11 it was responsible for brokering US hatered and of course the daily genocide of it's own people. Being the world's policeman is duty we must serve for being the world's leader.

The only downside of this war is there has never ever been peace in this part of the world. The best we might hope for is a foundation of democracy that did not exsist before.

Has anyone read " The greatest generation" have we forgotten the importance of our freedoms and the men who fought for those freedoms. If you forget, go out to Fort Snelling and let me know if you do not feel the blood and tears that made this country the best in the world.

Liberals lack the backbone to do the right thing and bigger goverment is not a better goverment.

There is not a candidate mentioned isted here that I would vote for.
McCain has become too moderate. I too hope that someone else emerges in the next two years.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:28 pm**

mike huckabee decided to run yesterday
he's starting his campaign in Iowa tomorrow and wednesday
hes the former governer of arkansas

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2007 10:39 pm**

I read The Greatest Generation and although I thought the book got a little repetitive it made me gain an unreal amount of respect for what my grandparents did for our country.

Deleted -- Political rant...

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2007 10:46 pm**

George Blanda wrote:. Not to change the subject, but It throws me for a loop that a person who is so against a war that has killed a few thousand americans in the last few years but support something that kills more than a million Americans each year. What gives?

Here Here! Spot on - you must be a reader of Ann Coultier? Her sentiments exactly and I couldn't agree more

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:28 pm**

Never too early.

We all need to be involved with open ears, open mind, but keep your principles in hand.

I don't think a woman can win, yet.

Obama cannot win. And he may be a decent man, but he is taking the same risk ML King took. I pray for his safety.

I think McCain could do a good job.

But before I back someone I want to see who else will come forward.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:47 pm**

Haha, not a reader of Ann Coultier, just a 20 year old kid trying to make sense of today's world.

I'll agree with elliott on this one, I can't make a vote for the 2008 presidential election before I hear the platform of each individual.

Posted: **Tue Jan 30, 2007 4:03 pm**

well stated elliot about keeping principles in hand while listening carefully.

George - keeping kicking them straight on with a square toe

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

2008 Presidential election

2008 Presidential election

Way too early.

Re: Way too early.