Teams listed W-L-T record reflects only games whose score 
is listed on the Tennessee HS Scores page.  


  The program starts all teams with an equal arbitrary value and then 
adjusts them all recursively based on game scores until the lowest cumulative 
error between expected goal differentials and actual goal differentials is 
reached (convergence).  



   The Total column is in goal units and the difference in this value between 
any two teams is the predicted goal differential for a game played at a 
neutral site between those two teams.   It should be noted that due to goal
differential limits set in the ranking program these predicted goal differentials
are only accurate when comparing teams ranked within three goals of each other.
The differential between teams ranked farther apart becomes more and more
understated as the chosen teams become farther apart in the rankings. 

 A teams Total value only has meaning in relation to other teams in the same list.

    The Last 5 column is a simple average performance of that team in the last five
games based on current opponent Total values and goal differential (up to max allowed).

     Obviously, the fewer games a team's ranking is based upon the less likely  
that ranking is to be accurate.

   Links to other ratings:
High School Rankings for 25 States  High School National Rankings  New England Prep 
Midget Minor AAA  Midget Major AAA  Men's NCAA D1  USHL  NAHL  ACHA College Club

Back to US HS Hockey Online main page.

       More information about how the ratings are calculated and their past 
accuracy can be found here .




Receive email when this page changes 






2009-2010 National Rankings released February 7, 2010

RANK  TEAM                               W  L  T   >4   GmPerf Sched  Total  Last 5
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  1,Pope John Paul II,TN,_______________ 16  1  1,  4   2.9,   1.5,   4.43,  3.88 
  2,Ravenwood,TN,_______________________ 14  2  4,  2   1.9,   2.2,   4.04,  4.67 
  3,Brentwood,TN,_______________________ 14  3  2,  1   1.6,   1.8,   3.40,  3.82 
  4,Centennial,TN,______________________ 10  4  3,  1   0.7,   1.9,   2.56,  1.91 
  5,Mt Juliet,TN,_______________________  9  8  2,  2   0.1,   1.4,   1.53,  2.06 
  6,Father Ryan,TN,_____________________  5  8  4,  0  -0.2,   1.6,   1.44,  0.64 
  7,Franklin,TN,________________________  8 10  1,  0  -0.5,   1.8,   1.29,  1.35 
  8,Montgomery Bell Acad,TN,____________  9  9  1,  0  -0.1,   1.0,   0.97,  2.56 
  9,Hendersonville,TN,__________________  8 11  0,  0  -0.6,   1.1,   0.57, -0.41 
 10,Wilson Central/Brentwood Acad,TN,___  6 11  2,  0  -0.8,   1.2,   0.41,  1.00 
 11,Station Camp - Hillsboro,TN,________  9  8  2,  1   0.4,  -1.4,  -0.99, -1.87 
 12,Independence - Page,TN,_____________  7  9  1,  1  -0.5,  -0.6,  -1.13, -1.45 
 13,Ensworth,TN,________________________  6 10  1,  1  -0.4,  -1.4,  -1.82, -2.58 
 14,Blackman,TN,________________________  4 10  3,  3  -0.5,  -1.5,  -2.03, -2.94 
 15,Ravenwood - Brentwood,TN,___________  4 13  1,  2  -1.9,  -1.5,  -3.35, -1.48 
 16,Beech - Hume Fogg,TN,_______________  3 14  0,  2  -2.0,  -1.4,  -3.44, -3.02 

Since some "mismatch" games are not used in determining the rankings, the Sched column can be somewhat misleading 
as it only reflects the average opponent strength of only the opponents ranked within 4 goals of each team.

The GAMES Column indicates how many games each team's rating is based upon (i.e. how many of their games were against teams
rated within 4 goals of themselves).