Teams that should be good next year
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 8:45 pm
Teams that should be good next year
What teams do you guys think should be good next year<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :hat --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... s/pimp.gif ALT=":hat"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Re: Teams that should be good next year
Buffalo should have a pretty good team next year there upper class went to state in bantams. Does anyone know how good Roseau is going to be next year. <p></p><i></i>
Re: Teams that should be good next year
<br>No one will be better than Holy Angels...again! <p></p><i></i>
Re: Teams that should be good next year
thats has nothing to do with the question <p></p><i></i>
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 7:34 pm
Re: Teams that should be good next year
one would expect the teams that are always competitive to simply re-load not rebuild. So im guessing most of the state tourney teams from this year will be good again next year.<br><br>CDH will have a good team next year with a lot of their young talent maturing and getting stronger/better. I think they have a good chance to win 2AA next year. <p></p><i></i>
Re: Teams that should be good next year
<br>Moorhead won't be nearly as good next year. They are losing 15 seniors! Jefferson is losing 10! No way these teams will be nearly as competitive. <p></p><i></i>
Re: Teams that should be good next year
Heres my top 5 in class A for next year at this point.<br><br>1.Thief River Falls<br>2.Duluth Marshall<br>3.Totino-Grace<br>4.St. Thomas Academy<br>5.Hibbing <p></p><i></i>
Re: Teams that should be good next year
roseau has my bet in section 8 AA they hav a great bantom team coming up and there uperclass is very good as well they have to get a golie though <p></p><i></i>
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 6:29 pm
teams that are good...
jefferson will have a hard time next year, so will eagan.... <br> rosemount will have 13 senoirs next year...<br><br>i think some different teams around the metro will make some noise next yr. <p></p><i></i>
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:57 pm
Re: teams that are good...
u must be from rosemount <p></p><i></i>
-
- Posts: 397
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2003 10:31 am
Re: teams that are good...
in Class A section 2 i would say Sauk Rapids <p>In memory of The One and Only Videoscout</p><i></i>
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:57 pm
Re: teams that are good...
did lee give the axe to videoscout? <p></p><i></i>
Re: teams that are good...
I think although Jefferson is losing 10 seniors, they still have some good underclassmen. Also, the lake conference should look different all around. Apple Valley losing their powerfull line of Swenson, Sexton, and Coles, Eastview is also losing a lot of seniors. <p></p><i></i>
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 6:29 pm
teams
yes i am a fan of rosemount hockey <p></p><i></i>
Moorehead / WBL
Moorehead may be loosing a ton of seniors but, if I'm not mistaken only one player from their "A" Bantam state Championship team 03/04, Christian, made the varsity team this season. Their JV team lost one game all season. I wouldn't write them off for next year. <br><br>WBL has two returning Pioneer Press All state players, one that will be a Mr. Hockey finalist and three very solid returning defensemen, plus the senior class won their respective "A" state bantam title, the sophomore class won the "A" peewee title.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Moorhead Next Year
Dont cut moorhead off too soon! They are going to have a good team, maybe not as good as this year...but they will have some fight in them! The JV team only lost one game this year and it was only by one point~ Moorhead is going to be stong next year!!! <p></p><i></i>
Re: Jefferson/Moorhead
both jefferson and moorhead will still be good... moorheads JV lost 1 game and Jefferson has some guys that will impact over the summer and be great next year. dont underestimate them. <p></p><i></i>
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:57 pm
Re: Jefferson/Moorhead
laura even if jefferson was gonna suck... you'd still say they gonna be good haha <p></p><i></i>
Re: Jefferson/Moorhead
gotpuck - if they are going to be good - you would still say they would suck.<br><br>just my opinion<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :D --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... /happy.gif ALT=":D"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> ....and I'm correct on that one. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p074.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... cuda701</A> at: 3/13/05 3:21 pm<br></i>
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:57 pm
Re: Jefferson/Moorhead
that sounds like sumthing someone who knows me would say haha <p></p><i></i>
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:37 pm
whey
what about red lake falls? <p></p><i></i>
-
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:56 pm
Re: whey
Duluth Marshall will have to replace Kozlak and Connolly, no doubt about that. But there are very good younger players ready to step up for next year, granted there are not many players though. We always get new player every year, everyone thought the same about DM last year, and look they got 3rd at state! DM will be a strong team next year! <p></p><i></i>
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 8:31 pm
Re: whey
Bergren is going to be a senior next year and his brother is going to be a sophomore <p></p><i></i>