Conference List

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Post Reply
Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Conference List

Post by Can't Never Tried »

Just for fun or “bored”om? I took the top 4 teams based on PS2 rating from each conf.
And added it up to give a total obviously the lower the total the better the Conf.

Here’s what it looks like.

Rank/ conf./ Total PS2 of lowest 4 in each Conf.
#1 NWSC 47
#2 Lake 50
#3 Classic Lk 58
#4 Classic Sub 87
#5 Mariucci 92
#6 Sub East 94
#7 Lk Superior 119
#8 IRC 168
#9 Missota 192
#10 Big 9 197
#11 Central Lakes 206
#12 North Sub Conf 208
#13 Wright Cty 240
#14 Tri Metro 261
#15 M8 346
#16 St Paul City 410 ........Took your two teams #’s and doubled it
#17 Mid State 441
#18 Southwest Conf 451
#19 Mpls City 466 ............Took your two teams #’s and doubled it
#20 Northwest Conf 504
#21 South Central 544

Didn’t do the independents as a conf.

edit to add Mid State Thanks puck
And Missota thanks Nickle :?
Last edited by Can't Never Tried on Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Top
Neutron 14
Posts: 5339
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm

Re: Conference List

Post by Neutron 14 »

Can't Never Tried wrote: Rank/ conf./ Total PS2 of lowest 4 in each Conf.

#15 St Paul City 410 ........Took your two teams #’s and doubled it

#17 Mpls City 466 ............Took your two teams #’s and doubled it
:lol: :lol:
The only soft spot I see is the one between my legs
Top
PuckRanger
Posts: 1829
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 8:15 am
Location: Iron Range
Contact:
Contact PuckRanger

Post by PuckRanger »

Am I just not seeing it, or did you miss the Mid-State Conference?

(Park Rapids, Northern Lakes, Detroit Lakes, and Wadena-Deer Creek)
Top
Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Post by Can't Never Tried »

PuckRanger wrote:Am I just not seeing it, or did you miss the Mid-State Conference?

(Park Rapids, Northern Lakes, Detroit Lakes, and Wadena-Deer Creek)
Missed it they're 441 I'll update it
Last edited by Can't Never Tried on Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Govs93
Posts: 4367
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:57 am
Location: Formerly Eastside - now Wayzata area

Re: Conference List

Post by Govs93 »

Neutron 14 wrote:
Can't Never Tried wrote: Rank/ conf./ Total PS2 of lowest 4 in each Conf.

#15 St Paul City 410 ........Took your two teams #’s and doubled it

#17 Mpls City 466 ............Took your two teams #’s and doubled it
:lol: :lol:
Como's draggin' us down. :roll:
Top
sachishi4
Posts: 1179
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 7:15 pm
Location: SLP

Post by sachishi4 »

i thought the classic suburban was the worst conference in the state though :roll:
Top
Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Post by Can't Never Tried »

sachishi4 wrote:i thought the classic suburban was the worst conference in the state though :roll:
Not the state :lol:
There is a pretty big point break between 3 and 4 though :wink:
Top
Neutron 14
Posts: 5339
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm

Post by Neutron 14 »

sachishi4 wrote:i thought the classic suburban was the worst conference in the state though :roll:
Only if you take out the top two...
The only soft spot I see is the one between my legs
Top
MNHockey08
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 4:52 pm

Post by MNHockey08 »

NWSC is a great conference where anybody has a chance to upset anyone, just look at the results. MG over Cenn, CP over Blaine, Andover over Blaine, and so on. Its fun to watch hockey from this conference for sure.
Top
Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Post by Can't Never Tried »

MNHockey08 wrote:NWSC is a great conference where anybody has a chance to upset anyone, just look at the results. MG over Cenn, CP over Blaine, Andover over Blaine, and so on. Its fun to watch hockey from this conference for sure.
That's because for the most part they came from District 10...or want to be :lol:
Top
nickel slots
Posts: 348
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 10:24 pm
Location: Northern Southern Minnesota

Post by nickel slots »

Missota?
Don't sweat the small stuff.
It's all small stuff.
Top
Neutron 14
Posts: 5339
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm

Post by Neutron 14 »

nickel slots wrote:Missota?
:lol: :lol: Thats it slots, keep him working! If your going to do it CNT, get it right!
The only soft spot I see is the one between my legs
Top
Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Post by Can't Never Tried »

Neutron 14 wrote:
nickel slots wrote:Missota?
:lol: :lol: Thats it slots, keep him working! If your going to do it CNT, get it right!
Fixed ...I had it, I just missed entering them..someone had a damn work question....I just hate when they bother me! :lol: :lol:
Top
Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Post by Can't Never Tried »

Neutron 14 wrote:
nickel slots wrote:Missota?
:lol: :lol: Thats it slots, keep him working! If your going to do it CNT, get it right!
Ha ! you didn't catch it :lol:
Top
DubCHAGuy
Posts: 404
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:44 am

Post by DubCHAGuy »

Neutron 14 wrote:
sachishi4 wrote:i thought the classic suburban was the worst conference in the state though :roll:
Only if you take out the top two...
The CSC team's record against other conferences:

vs. Lake: 4-1 (CSC #4 Mahtomedi with 2 of the wins)
vs. SEC: 7-3-1 (SEC #1 team Woodbury beat CSC #3 SSP in OT and #5 Tartan 6-4)
vs. NWSC: 1-1
vs. Big 9: 2-0
vs. Missota: 6-5-1
vs. LkSup/IRC: 3-3

I'm not putting the CSC at the top of the list, but I think some of the "big boys" should beat these teams before claiming superiority.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Minnesota High School Hockey (Older Topics)”