AHA-Mpls South..... 0 shots on goal

dbosco
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 8:23 pm

AHA-Mpls South..... 0 shots on goal

Post by dbosco » Fri Feb 18, 2005 8:23 pm

According to newspaper the Stars had 12 goals and 28 shots thru 2 periods and 0 goals and 0 shots in the 3rd. I think it's great that they called off the dogs after 2 but can someone who was at the game tell me what the 3rd period looked like? We're they just skating around in circles and not taking any shots???? <p></p><i></i>

hockeyfanmn
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 2:22 pm

Re: AHA-Mpls South..... 0 shots on goal

Post by hockeyfanmn » Fri Feb 18, 2005 9:11 pm

That is exactly what happened - Trebil has enough class not to run up the score in this situation. <p></p><i></i>

CENTERstrikes
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 9:01 pm

Re: AHA-Mpls South..... 0 shots on goal

Post by CENTERstrikes » Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:17 pm

Trebil has no class...for the first time he did sumthin smart... <p></p><i></i>

starsalum
Posts: 414
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 7:51 pm

Re: AHA-Mpls South..... 0 shots on goal

Post by starsalum » Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:20 pm

please endulge <p>Spittin truf since 85</p><i></i>

dank06
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 9:21 pm

good move

Post by dank06 » Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:32 pm

nicely done... about time he stopped runnin up the score. <p></p><i></i>

SkoalApple
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:36 pm

Re: good move

Post by SkoalApple » Fri Feb 18, 2005 11:21 pm

i have seen trebil call off the dogs many times in games like that. to say he has no class is a cheap shot if there ever was, and i say that being someone who has taken his fair share of shots at the AHA coaches over the past couple of years. (just ask zamman and starsalum) if coach trebil wanted to, he could put up 20+ goals a game in almost every conf. game that AHA plays. <p></p><i></i>

2AhockeyOldTimer
Posts: 1140
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 1:24 pm

Re: good move

Post by 2AhockeyOldTimer » Fri Feb 18, 2005 11:33 pm

Yeah, because its less cocky to score goals than just pass it around the other team.<br><br>Score Goals, blow them out...its not classless, its classy. I personally think that passing around them is really cocky, showing that they can't do anything about it no matter how hard they try. <p></p><i></i>

Chris J
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2002 9:28 am

Re: AHA-Mpls South..... 0 shots on goal

Post by Chris J » Fri Feb 18, 2005 11:44 pm

You know, following that pattern of "reasoning", perhaps they could have pulled their goalie for the entire third period and scored another 10-15 goals. That would indicate that they were really exuding class.<br><br>Incredible thinking...<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rolleyes --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... s/eyes.gif ALT=":rolleyes"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

SwitchCard
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 5:44 pm

RE:

Post by SwitchCard » Fri Feb 18, 2005 11:45 pm

I will agree that is shows some class to not run up the score. However, this is high school hockey and going up by 10 goals is ludacris. I will say it took a lot to take no shots in the 3rd, but maybe he could have started calling off the dogs a little sooner. The season is over, why make it so hard on the south kids if it doesnt in any way benefit aha? <p></p><i></i>

hp
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 4:40 pm

Re: RE:

Post by hp » Sat Feb 19, 2005 1:43 am

Its a no win situation. If you run up the score people immediately jump on you for not having any class, but at the same time if you call off the dogs people start saying that you are cocky because you just skate it around the other team. Either way the kids from the losing team are going to feel bad about their season ending but what can you do to fix this problem. there is no way plain and simple. This is something that the mshshl has to find a remedy to. <p></p><i></i>

slapshooter
Posts: 4100
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2002 12:30 pm

Real Class!..........by SS

Post by slapshooter » Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:00 am

C<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START >: --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... ns/mad.gif ALT=">:"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> M<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START >: --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... ns/mad.gif ALT=">:"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> N B<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START >: --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... ns/mad.gif ALT=">:"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> YS! <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :( --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... /frown.gif ALT=":("><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rolleyes --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... s/eyes.gif ALT=":rolleyes"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :( --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... /frown.gif ALT=":("><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>If they really had class, they would have just let their opponents take all the shots at their own goalie during the 3rd just to give him a little more practice !<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>They still creamed 'em didn't they?</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>When I was a kid, <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>last century</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->, we used to let the weaker teams get 3 or 4 goals ahead, just so we could make the <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>crushing comeback</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->!<br><br>Give 'em a little <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"false hope"!</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>There's a remedy!</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Give it a try!</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :D --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... /happy.gif ALT=":D"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>Couldn't <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>hurt!</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Could it?</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :evil --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... /devil.gif ALT=":evil"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>S<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START 8o --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... s/nerd.gif ALT="8o"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> S</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p074.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... shooter</A> at: 2/19/05 2:05 am<br></i>

wolfpack85
Posts: 78
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:33 pm

Re: RE:

Post by wolfpack85 » Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:01 am

Is there a possible solution to this problem? There have always been blowouts in every sport and there always will be. It's just a part of the game. There are great teams and there are horrible teams. Unfortunately, for the sake of "fair play" they have to face each other in the section tournaments. I think the blowouts could be reduced somewhat if there was 2nd period running time but there's a problem with that too. My last game we got killed. Outshot 8-1 and dominated from start to finish. Most people asked me how relieved I was when it was all over. Truth is, when the final horn blew, that was a terrible moment for me. That game couldn't have lasted long enough. So that team probably doesn't want anything like that to happen anyway(if they care about hockey as much as I did/do). I think it's fine the way it is. We just need to accept that blowouts will occur and the winning team, no matter how unfair it is, will look likee the bad guy no matter what. Good luck to all in section semis. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p074.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... fpack85</A> at: 2/19/05 2:08 am<br></i>

Sparlimb
Posts: 1505
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2002 7:11 am

Time to revise my picks

Post by Sparlimb » Sat Feb 19, 2005 7:45 am

I picked Mpls South to win it all. Man.<br><br>Better go back to my old favorite, St. Cloud Apollo <p></p><i></i>

icedreamer11
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 7:46 am

Re: Time to revise my picks

Post by icedreamer11 » Sat Feb 19, 2005 8:12 am

passing it around a team playing keep away is not classy. You people are what Joe would call euphoreans, Have any of you been on both sides of an ass whooping? I have and on the losing side of it I would have been humiliated if a team mocked us, if they crushed us at least I knew they didn't toy with us. On the winnning side, it's one thing to ease up, it's quite another to toy with your opponent like playing keep away from your little brother, THAT IS TRULY HUMILIATING. You people are warped!! <p></p><i></i>

suckhole00
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 9:42 pm

SCA

Post by suckhole00 » Sat Feb 19, 2005 8:52 am

Sparlimb....going back to a team thats already done?<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... s/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

Zamman
Posts: 2060
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2002 1:15 pm
Location: Edina

Re: SCA

Post by Zamman » Sat Feb 19, 2005 10:02 am

It is obvious that none of you were at the game. AHA did not just 'pass' it around to humiliate South. They played a more defensive game to be more prepared for the rest of the playoffs. If they wanted to, AHA could have put another 20 shots and ten goals up on South. South was still playing with high intensity and that showed by the amount of penalties in the third for both sides Oh by the way, Trebil was not real happy with the way some of the players were playing in the third period. He was getting on them big time. He has high expectations, and expects it from them all the time....<br> <p></p><i></i>

elfman
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 1:35 pm

AHA

Post by elfman » Sat Feb 19, 2005 1:47 pm

you guys should stop complaining if they AHA were to stop then they would get into the mood of just passing and it would be a horrible next game <p></p><i></i>

Sparlimb
Posts: 1505
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2002 7:11 am

Apollo lost already? Man, my allegiance switches to Cretin

Post by Sparlimb » Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:30 pm

If they can beat Hastings they are obviously 3 goals better then Moorhead. <p></p><i></i>

Locked