2008-09 Connecticut High School Hockey Rankings

Mismatch games (between teams rated more than 4 goals apart) are not used in ratings calculations. 

RANK  TEAM                               W  L  T   >4   GmPerf Sched  Total  Last 5    
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  1,Fairfield Prep,CT,__________________ 10  3  0,  0   2.1,   8.8,  10.85, 10.24 
  2,Trinity Catholic,CT,________________ 14  1  0,  4   3.2,   7.4,  10.62, 10.01 
  3,Hamden,CT,__________________________ 12  3  1,  0   1.2,   8.3,   9.57, 10.23 
  4,Notre Dame-Fairfield,CT,____________ 12  4  1,  0   0.9,   8.2,   9.15,  9.79 
  5,Simsbury,CT,________________________ 12  3  1,  1   1.6,   7.5,   9.12,  9.58 
  6,Tri-Town,CT,________________________ 12  3  1,  1   1.6,   7.2,   8.79,  8.46 
  7,Enfield,CT,_________________________ 12  3  0,  0   1.8,   6.9,   8.70,  8.89 
  8,Xavier,CT,__________________________  9  4  0,  1   1.0,   7.7,   8.69,  8.21 
  9,Glastonbury,CT,_____________________ 12  4  1,  0   1.8,   6.9,   8.67,  8.81 
 10,West Haven,CT,______________________  9  8  0,  1   0.4,   8.2,   8.61,  8.89 
 11,Greenwich,CT,_______________________ 11  4  3,  1   1.4,   7.0,   8.40,  6.99 
 12,Fermi,CT,___________________________ 11  4  0,  0   1.0,   7.4,   8.40,  8.27 
 13,New Canaan,CT,______________________  8  6  3,  1   0.4,   7.7,   8.11,  8.08 
 14,North Haven,CT,_____________________  8  5  2,  0   0.4,   7.6,   8.05,  8.34 
 15,Cheshire,CT,________________________ 13  2  1,  2   1.6,   6.4,   8.01,  8.87 
 16,Darien,CT,__________________________  9  6  3,  0   0.1,   7.8,   7.83,  7.48 
 17,Notre Dame-West Haven,CT,___________  6  8  0,  0  -0.6,   8.4,   7.73,  6.92 
 18,Ridgefield,CT,______________________  7  8  1,  1   0.0,   7.7,   7.67,  8.02 
 19,East Haven,CT,______________________  9  6  1,  0   0.6,   6.9,   7.57,  7.61 
 20,Amity,CT,___________________________ 10  6  0,  0   0.6,   6.9,   7.43,  6.80 
 21,Conard,CT,__________________________  8  5  1,  0  -0.1,   7.5,   7.42,  6.80 
 22,Branford,CT,________________________  8  6  1,  0   0.7,   6.7,   7.42,  7.26 
 23,Staples-Weston,CT,__________________  9  6  0,  2   1.1,   6.2,   7.33,  6.36 
 24,St Joseph,CT,_______________________ 12  4  1,  1   1.0,   6.3,   7.30,  6.87 
 25,Suffield-Granby-Windsor Locks,CT,___ 11  3  0,  1   1.5,   5.8,   7.23,  7.61 
 26,Avon,CT,____________________________  7  7  1,  0  -0.1,   7.2,   7.16,  6.76 
 27,Hall-Southington,CT,________________ 12  1  2,  4   2.1,   5.0,   7.12,  6.02 
 28,Lyman Hall,CT,______________________ 12  4  0,  2   1.0,   6.0,   6.95,  6.38 
 29,Stamford,CT,________________________  8  7  1,  0   0.2,   6.7,   6.89,  7.67 
 30,East Catholic,CT,___________________  8  8  0,  0  -0.1,   7.0,   6.84,  5.71 
 31,South Windsor,CT,___________________  3 12  1,  0  -1.3,   8.1,   6.83,  7.13 
 32,Farmington,CT,______________________  5 10  1,  0  -0.9,   7.4,   6.50,  6.09 
 33,Bethel-Brookfield-Danbury,CT,_______ 11  3  0,  0   1.4,   4.9,   6.35,  7.18 
 34,Guilford,CT,________________________ 10  5  0,  3   0.6,   5.8,   6.34,  7.69 
 35,Fairfield Warde/Ludlowe,CT,_________  5 10  1,  0  -0.8,   7.0,   6.28,  8.37 
 36,Daniel Hand,CT,_____________________  2 10  1,  0  -1.4,   7.6,   6.25,  4.93 
 37,Immaculate,CT,______________________  2 13  0,  1  -2.1,   8.2,   6.14,  6.34 
 38,St Bernard-Bacon,CT,________________  8  7  0,  1   0.4,   5.7,   6.11,  7.26 
 39,North Branford,CT,__________________  3 12  1,  0  -1.6,   7.6,   5.96,  6.48 
 40,Housatonic-Northwestern,CT,_________  9  6  0,  0   0.3,   5.5,   5.82,  5.15 
 41,Northwest Catholic,CT,______________  8  3  1,  3   0.0,   5.8,   5.79,  5.90 
 42,Westhill,CT,________________________  3 12  1,  1  -1.4,   7.1,   5.67,  4.98 
 43,New Milford,CT,_____________________  7 10  0,  0  -0.2,   5.8,   5.65,  5.06 
 44,Joel Barlow,CT,_____________________  9  6  0,  1   0.4,   5.2,   5.62,  5.59 
 45,Trumbull,CT,________________________  4 10  1,  1  -1.3,   6.9,   5.60,  6.69 
 46,Rocky Hill-RHAM,CT,_________________  7  7  1,  0   0.1,   5.5,   5.58,  5.27 
 47,Wilton,CT,__________________________  6  9  0,  0  -1.0,   6.4,   5.40,  5.50 
 48,Rockville-Manchester,CT,____________  6  9  0,  2  -1.0,   6.3,   5.30,  5.02 
 49,Masuk,CT,___________________________  7  6  0,  0   0.0,   5.0,   5.03,  6.17 
 50,Watertown-Pomperaug,CT,_____________  5  9  1,  0  -0.7,   5.7,   4.96,  3.50 
 51,Newington-Berlin,CT,________________  7  8  1,  0  -0.5,   5.2,   4.74,  5.04 
 52,Wethersfield,CT,____________________  2 12  1,  1  -2.2,   6.8,   4.61,  4.74 
 53,Sheehan,CT,_________________________  2 12  0,  0  -1.9,   6.3,   4.41,  4.36 
 54,EO Smith-Tolland-Windham,CT,________  5  9  1,  0  -0.5,   4.6,   4.09,  4.38 
 55,Milford Coop,CT,____________________  1 13  0,  2  -2.5,   6.4,   3.85,  4.06 
 56,Bolton-Coventry-Lyman Memorial,CT,__  3 11  0,  0  -1.6,   5.3,   3.64,  4.30 
 57,Newtown,CT,_________________________  4 11  0,  0  -1.1,   4.8,   3.64,  2.74 
 58,Shepaug-Litchfield-Wamogo,CT,_______  5 11  0,  0  -1.2,   4.7,   3.42,  3.45 
 59,Shelton,CT,_________________________  3 10  0,  1  -0.8,   4.0,   3.30,  3.32 
 60,Norwalk-McMahon,CT,_________________  0 14  0,  7  -3.1,   5.4,   2.28,  2.33 
 61,Windsor-East Granby,CT,_____________  1 14  0,  7  -2.6,   2.7,   0.11,  0.08 
 62,Fitch-East Lyme-Ledyard,CT,_________  1 13  0,  9  -2.8,   2.9,   0.09,  0.09 

Since some "mismatch" games are not used in determining the rankings, the Sched column can be 
somewhat misleading as it reflects the average opponent strength of only the opponents ranked 
within 4 goals of each team.