2008-09 Connecticut High School Hockey Rankings

Mismatch games (between teams rated more than 4 goals apart) are not used in ratings calculations. 

RANK  TEAM                               W  L  T   >4   GmPerf Sched  Total  Last 5    
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  1,Fairfield Prep,CT,__________________ 13  7  1,  0   1.5,   9.3,  10.83,  9.22 
  2,Trinity Catholic,CT,________________ 21  4  0,  4   2.3,   8.2,  10.58,  9.65 
  3,Hamden,CT,__________________________ 19  4  1,  0   1.2,   9.0,  10.25, 11.41 
  4,Notre Dame-Fairfield,CT,____________ 17  5  1,  1   1.0,   8.7,   9.79,  9.44 
  5,Simsbury,CT,________________________ 14  7  1,  2   1.1,   8.3,   9.49,  8.55 
  6,Glastonbury,CT,_____________________ 17  7  2,  2   1.0,   8.4,   9.42, 10.27 
  7,Xavier,CT,__________________________ 13  8  1,  1   0.9,   8.5,   9.39,  9.85 
  8,Fermi,CT,___________________________ 18  6  1,  2   1.0,   8.4,   9.38, 10.27 
  9,West Haven,CT,______________________ 11 11  0,  1   0.2,   8.9,   9.13,  8.80 
 10,Notre Dame-West Haven,CT,___________ 11 11  1,  0  -0.2,   9.2,   9.02,  9.99 
 11,Greenwich,CT,_______________________ 15  6  3,  1   1.1,   7.8,   8.96,  8.87 
 12,Enfield,CT,_________________________ 19  6  0,  2   1.5,   7.4,   8.89,  9.33 
 13,New Canaan,CT,______________________ 11  9  3,  1   0.4,   8.5,   8.84,  9.53 
 14,Darien,CT,__________________________ 14  8  3,  1   0.2,   8.4,   8.62,  9.16 
 15,East Haven,CT,______________________ 12  7  2,  1   0.7,   7.9,   8.57,  9.58 
 16,Cheshire,CT,________________________ 20  3  2,  1   1.6,   7.0,   8.56,  9.76 
 17,Tri-Town,CT,________________________ 13  8  1,  1   0.8,   7.6,   8.42,  6.92 
 18,North Haven,CT,_____________________ 10  9  2,  0  -0.1,   8.5,   8.36,  7.77 
 19,Branford,CT,________________________ 16  7  1,  1   1.1,   7.2,   8.28,  7.35 
 20,Staples-Weston,CT,__________________ 14 10  0,  2   1.2,   7.0,   8.24,  7.50 
 21,Conard,CT,__________________________ 11 10  1,  0  -0.2,   8.4,   8.17,  9.24 
 22,Ridgefield,CT,______________________  9 13  1,  1  -0.2,   8.3,   8.15,  8.42 
 23,South Windsor,CT,___________________  9 14  1,  0  -0.5,   8.5,   8.01,  8.50 
 24,Amity,CT,___________________________ 14  9  1,  0   0.5,   7.4,   7.90,  7.46 
 25,St Joseph,CT,_______________________ 15  8  1,  1   0.4,   7.3,   7.73,  8.43 
 26,Avon,CT,____________________________ 12 10  1,  0   0.0,   7.7,   7.67,  8.35 
 27,Lyman Hall,CT,______________________ 17  7  0,  2   0.7,   6.7,   7.42,  6.89 
 28,St Bernard-Bacon,CT,________________ 14 10  0,  1   0.9,   6.4,   7.30,  8.96 
 29,Hall-Southington,CT,________________ 17  4  2,  4   1.5,   5.8,   7.29,  6.36 
 30,Stamford,CT,________________________ 12 10  1,  0   0.2,   7.1,   7.29,  6.98 
 31,Daniel Hand,CT,_____________________  5 13  1,  0  -1.1,   8.4,   7.27,  7.94 
 32,Suffield-Granby-Windsor Locks,CT,___ 13  9  0,  1   0.5,   6.7,   7.20,  6.29 
 33,Farmington,CT,______________________  6 13  1,  0  -0.8,   7.7,   6.88,  5.59 
 34,East Catholic,CT,___________________  9 11  1,  0  -0.4,   7.2,   6.86,  5.85 
 35,Immaculate,CT,______________________  5 16  0,  0  -1.8,   8.6,   6.85,  7.70 
 36,Fairfield Warde/Ludlowe,CT,_________  7 12  2,  0  -0.6,   7.4,   6.84,  6.90 
 37,Guilford,CT,________________________ 14  7  0,  4   0.9,   5.9,   6.75,  6.41 
 38,Northwest Catholic,CT,______________ 16  7  2,  4   0.1,   6.3,   6.35,  6.85 
 39,Bethel-Brookfield-Danbury,CT,_______ 16  6  0,  0   1.0,   5.3,   6.34,  6.07 
 40,North Branford,CT,__________________  4 14  2,  0  -1.5,   7.8,   6.33,  5.99 
 41,New Milford,CT,_____________________  8 14  0,  0  -0.3,   6.5,   6.17,  6.32 
 42,Housatonic-Northwestern,CT,_________ 11 11  0,  0  -0.2,   6.4,   6.14,  6.37 
 43,Rocky Hill-RHAM,CT,_________________ 11 10  2,  0   0.4,   5.7,   6.11,  6.05 
 44,Wilton,CT,__________________________  8 13  0,  1  -0.7,   6.7,   6.03,  5.44 
 45,Joel Barlow,CT,_____________________ 14  9  0,  1   0.5,   5.5,   6.02,  5.91 
 46,Trumbull,CT,________________________  6 13  1,  1  -1.0,   7.0,   6.01,  5.69 
 47,Westhill,CT,________________________  4 15  1,  1  -1.4,   7.4,   5.99,  4.83 
 48,Rockville-Manchester,CT,____________  9 13  0,  2  -0.8,   6.3,   5.59,  6.92 
 49,Masuk,CT,___________________________ 13 10  0,  0  -0.1,   5.6,   5.52,  6.77 
 50,Newington-Berlin,CT,________________ 11 12  1,  2  -0.6,   6.1,   5.49,  6.35 
 51,Wethersfield,CT,____________________  3 16  1,  5  -1.9,   7.1,   5.18,  5.08 
 52,Watertown-Pomperaug,CT,_____________  6 14  1,  0  -1.1,   6.2,   5.12,  3.89 
 53,EO Smith-Tolland-Windham,CT,________  7 13  2,  1  -0.5,   5.3,   4.79,  5.53 
 54,Milford Coop,CT,____________________  3 17  0,  2  -2.1,   6.6,   4.54,  5.28 
 55,Sheehan,CT,_________________________  2 18  0,  0  -1.9,   6.5,   4.51,  3.46 
 56,Bolton-Coventry-Lyman Memorial,CT,__  7 13  0,  0  -0.9,   5.4,   4.51,  5.37 
 57,Newtown,CT,_________________________  6 14  0,  2  -0.7,   5.0,   4.26,  4.97 
 58,Shelton,CT,_________________________  4 16  0,  2  -1.3,   5.0,   3.64,  3.61 
 59,Shepaug-Litchfield-Wamogo,CT,_______  5 14  1,  0  -1.5,   4.8,   3.31,  1.61 
 60,Norwalk-McMahon,CT,_________________  0 19  1,  8  -3.2,   5.6,   2.48,  2.17 
 61,Fitch-East Lyme-Ledyard,CT,_________  2 17  0,  9  -2.6,   3.9,   1.30,  2.07 
 62,Windsor-East Granby,CT,_____________  1 19  0, 11  -2.8,   2.9,   0.10,  0.71 

Since some "mismatch" games are not used in determining the rankings, the Sched column can be 
somewhat misleading as it reflects the average opponent strength of only the opponents ranked 
within 4 goals of each team.