Page 2 of 2
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 4:10 pm
by inthebox
i think tartan will have an okay year. the bantam team will help to add to the depth and i would expect the sophmores for next season to help the team. i am not saying they will finish on top but they will definately be competitive in every game.
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 10:56 pm
by gopher5
How is Mitch Rowe from Tartan doing? I only got to see him play once last year and he looked pretty good to me? I haven't seen him in a while and i was just wondering how he's doing.
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:24 am
by TARTANTITAN11
hes not big enough to play varsity or have an impact, and alot of the bantams are not focused enough on hockey to be good, they were girl pants, and dont work hard
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:39 am
by Sparlimb
TARTANTITAN11 wrote:hes not big enough to play varsity or have an impact, and alot of the bantams are not focused enough on hockey to be good, they were girl pants, and dont work hard
try spell check
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:12 pm
by inthebox
thanks for the support tartan titan 11 (sarcasm). dont even try to knock my work ethic you loser.

oh yeah and i dont know anyone who wears girl pants. oh yea and mitch rowe has a lot of heart for a smaller kid. he wont back down and neither will any of us.
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 8:38 pm
by TARTANTITAN11
until u make a team, dont post on here
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:20 pm
by hockey_playa7
OOOOOO Tartan almost beat Woodbury? Did they? no i think they lost actually... I didnt realize that tartan should get some attention for ALMOST beating woodbury... besides woodbury smoked them in shots, carry wood was the reason they won any games at all.. and without him next year, in 4AA, haha goodluck...
Tartan Titans
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:36 pm
by stpaul
The Tartans eating their young (or in Tartan English - "there" young). Sometimes I check in here during the summer just for the entertainment value.
Oh by the way - how about these baseball scores:
Apr. 13 - HM 7, Tartan 5
May 2 - HM 9, Tartan 4
Jun 1 - HM 4, Tartan 3
Jun 6 - HM 3, Tartan 1
Hill-Murray - Classic Suburban Conference & Section 4AAA Champions
Oh my, how can this be?
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:05 pm
by H-M 4 Life
I dont why TARTANTITAN11 posted this. We all know tartan is going to suck like they do evey year this year. They are always garbage. They have no discipline and I would rather have a coach that has been to State 3 out of the past 6 years than for a coach that hasnt done one thing for the program because u guys still lose and will always lose because ur tartan which is a terrible school anyways. So how about u go back to 8 mile and take ur crap hockey team with ya.
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 10:01 pm
by HShockeywatcher
stpaul, did they take 4AAA? I can't find anywhere that has that accurately.
Even if they did, they won because they have a good team and program and have been good the past few years, maybe more. But what does that have to do with hockey? I remember a few years ago when Tartan was the conference champ in hockey and went to state.
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 7:44 am
by Pioneerprideguy
Stpaul,
Let's not forget about the Pioneer football team. HM 19 Tartan 0. Pioneers celebrate another conference title in front of the Titans. Talk about total dominance of Tartan this year across the board. Big bad public school with it's large enrollment can't touch the tiny public school. Ya gotta love it!
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 7:51 am
by Govs93
HShockeywatcher wrote:stpaul, did they take 4AAA? I can't find anywhere that has that accurately.
Even if they did, they won because they have a good team and program and have been good the past few years, maybe more. But what does that have to do with hockey? I remember a few years ago when Tartan was the conference champ in hockey and went to state.
They did win
4AAA (unfortunately).
And as far as a "few years ago", that doesn't really mean much either, does it? Damn near every team in the state went to the Tourney "a few years ago" - particularly suburban schools. The difference is that many of them are able to sustain an upper eschelon program for several consecutive seasons (whether they make tourney appearances or not). Tartan has not done that. They'll jump into the mix from time-to-time, but there's no consistency from one season to another with them.
Re: Tartan Titans
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 8:03 am
by Neutron 14
stpaul wrote:The Tartans eating their young (or in Tartan English - "there" young).
Excellent!
It appears the demographics of Tartan has changed since their haydays of um, well, lemme see, oh never mind.
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 1:26 pm
by inthebox
i am glad i don't go to hill anymore if this is how all you people think. what does baseball and football have to do with hockey anyway???
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:42 am
by Pioneerprideguy
Inthebox,
First of all, sorry you were unable to handle the academics at Hill and were asked to leave. Secondly, your handle (inthebox) is very fitting at Tartan. Lastly, talking about Hill's total dominance of Tartan is just a way to cool off the morons from Tartan who come on this board every year and brag up their program. Hopefully this will cool their heals for a bit...doubtful.
basketball?
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 5:10 pm
by PuckNasty07
who has the state records for basketball...?
o I heard hills asst baseball coach is a gay child molester? any truth to this coming out!? That he called or texted two of the players asking for sexual favors!....
creeper.....
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 7:17 pm
by Pioneerprideguy
We all know basketball is basically played by all those people who are not tough enough to play hockey. As for the alleged incident involving one of Hill's basketball coaches, it once again points out the difference between kids at Hill & kids at Tartan. The Hill kids never accepted the proposition, informed their parents, who then notified the school, who in turn notified the authorities. Tartan kids would have accepted the proposition, followed thru with the "activities", and bought beer with the money they received.

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 7:20 pm
by Reggie
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:59 pm
by shooter111
TARTANTITAN11 wrote:until u make a team, dont post on here
haa. If i have my jersey numbers correct 11, you've got no right to judge, considering you couldn't even make varsity yourself. 5 bucks says half the bantam team could take you easy.
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 3:29 pm
by TARTANTITAN11
welll, sorry u dont big guy
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 4:52 pm
by sachishi4
well if you really are a tartan player, wouldnt it be better to be out working on your skills and skating instead of sitting on a computer fighting over the internet?
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 5:33 pm
by breakout
Pioneerprideguy wrote:We all know basketball is basically played by all those people who are not tough enough to play hockey. As for the alleged incident involving one of Hill's basketball coaches, it once again points out the difference between kids at Hill & kids at Tartan. The Hill kids never accepted the proposition, informed their parents, who then notified the school, who in turn notified the authorities. Tartan kids would have accepted the proposition, followed thru with the "activities", and bought beer with the money they received.

WOW
