HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Posted: **Thu Jan 03, 2008 2:36 pm**

He was illuding to the rivalry by mentioning that stuff, so ease up. Woodbury wins.

Posted: **Thu Jan 03, 2008 2:50 pm**

woodbury should crush Cretin in this one. 4-2

Posted: **Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:55 pm**

What is "illuding"????

Posted: **Thu Jan 03, 2008 5:01 pm**

16 year old Zeke wrote:What is "illuding"????

Posted: **Thu Jan 03, 2008 5:04 pm**

Zeke16 wrote:What is "illuding"????

It's what you do when you have too many quaaludes.

Posted: **Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:32 pm**

Woodbury by two.

Posted: **Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:04 pm**

parrish4president wrote:woodbury should crush Cretin in this one. 4-2

You say they crush them but only win by 2...

Woodbury wins this one though I agree on that but I think CDH will make a game of it.

Royals-3
Raiders-1

Posted: **Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:09 pm**

royals by a handful

Woody-6
Catholic clowns-1

Posted: **Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:01 pm**

Zeke16 wrote:"all-american wideout michael floyd personally and absolutely can't stand him because he is just insufferably cocky. (yes, i actually know this firsthand, its not just something someone told me"

Absolutely WRONG!! Just because a player is good doesn't mean he is cocky. Jealousy will get you nowhere!!

i know plenty of good players tha are not at all cocky, but michael floyd is not one of them. the first time i ever met him, the first think he said to me is, and i quote, "your football team is terrible." if that not cockiness, what is it considered?

Posted: **Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:09 pm**

saintpaulhockey wrote:
actually yeah even when woodbury went 1-9 two years in a row they gave creting their toughest test of the regular season both years. in 2006, they were the only team to have a lead on them until the state tournament. this past season, they came out strong and once again took an early lead, the first lead of the year for any team agaisnt cretin. its also turning into a big rivalry in football because many of woodbury's fans know all-american wideout michael floyd personally and absolutely can't stand him because he is just insufferably cocky. (yes, i actually know this firsthand, its not just something someone told me)
You're so stupid. First of all this is a hockey forum, and you are talking about how Woodbury almost won a game (not even true) and you're saying that you, most likely an overpriviledged rich kid, personally know Michael Floyd. That is not true, and you're saying the kid who's dad ran away, mom makes next to nothing and who takes the bus every morning before 5:00 just to get to the cafeteria and do work so he can afford school is cocky! Unbelievable. Oh, and by the way CDH wins 5-3, woodbury has'nt played anyone yet.

easy man calm down. i am a woodbury kid and yes i have some money. but i do know michael floyd and i think hes extremely cocky. i don't know how any of the stuff u just mentioned has anything to do with his attitude, but whatever. and i know this is a hockey forum i just said this was turning into a big rivalry in all sports, but then every1 keeps questioning it so i have to respond. but ill just have to get over my opinion of floyd anywyas though, cuz i'm a notre dame fan. and now i'm done talking about football on this for good.

Posted: **Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:39 pm**

My public education has let me down once again, darn!

Posted: **Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:03 pm**

Listen, just cause your dad ran away and your mom doesn't make a lot of money, doesn't mean you can't be cocky. And from what i heard he's as cocky as they come.

Woodbury - 3

CDH - 1

Posted: **Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:44 pm**

Listen, just cause your dad ran away and your mom doesn't make a lot of money, doesn't mean you can't be cocky. And from what i heard he's as cocky as they come.

I am sick of this topic. He is a nice kid, I go to school with him and don't even really know him but he still is friendly to me. Anyways, who has Woodbury played? I know they are a good team but do they have any convincing victories? I know they played Rosemount close and lost 7-4 to Hopkins.

Posted: **Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:04 am**

Looks like the boys in the blue mittens overlooked Hastings last night.

Hastings 3

Woodbury 1

Way to go Raiders. (Hastings)

Posted: **Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:05 am**

Looks like the boys in the blue mittens overlooked Hastings last night.

Hastings 3

Woodbury 1

Way to go Raiders. (Hastings)

Posted: **Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:26 am**

SEC Scotty wrote:Looks like the boys in the blue mittens overlooked Hastings last night.

Hastings 3

Woodbury 1

Way to go Raiders. (Hastings)

It sure does look like Woodbury was probably looking ahead to Saturday's game with Cretin. Either that, or Hastings is on a roll.

Posted: **Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:10 am**

I see Woodbury had 39 shots. Not an unusual experience for the Hastings goalie who must have been hot.

Its a bad loss for Woodbury's conference hopes.

Won't mean a thing come Sat night but I am still pickin da Rahdahs.

Posted: **Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:02 am**

Embarrassing to say the least.. Hastings played well, but not what i expected.

Posted: **Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:45 am**

Woodbury had better be able to find the back of the net against these Raiders - unlike Thursday night against the Raiders of Hastings.

In fact, Woodbury plays the Raiders three games in a row - - Hastings, Cretin and at Roseville on January 10th.

Posted: **Sat Jan 05, 2008 5:23 pm**

Govs93 wrote:
royals0951 wrote:
Pioneerprideguy wrote:Rivalry in football?....ummm, ok.
actually yeah even when woodbury went 1-9 two years in a row they gave creting their toughest test of the regular season both years. in 2006, they were the only team to have a lead on them until the state tournament. this past season, they came out strong and once again took an early lead, the first lead of the year for any team agaisnt cretin. its also turning into a big rivalry in football because many of woodbury's fans know all-american wideout michael floyd personally and absolutely can't stand him because he is just insufferably cocky. (yes, i actually know this firsthand, its not just something someone told me)
Sounds to me like somebody may have a rivalry with Cretin, but I seriously doubt the Raiders ever thought twice about Woodbury in return.

good point

Posted: **Sat Jan 05, 2008 5:24 pm**

just about to head out to highland to watch this one. even with koop and erickson out, ill tkae woodbury 3-2

Posted: **Sat Jan 05, 2008 5:42 pm**

i think kopps playin

Posted: **Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:16 pm**

Great Game, very intense
Royals get the victory 3-1

Posted: **Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:29 pm**

pipes3030 wrote:Great Game, very intense
Royals get the victory 3-1

Empty net goal??

Posted: **Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:36 pm**

nope, and bangs scored for cretin, so didn't woodbury score four goals?

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Woodbury vs. Cretin (Jan. 5th, '08)

hmmm