Page 2 of 2

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 1:16 pm
by BodyShots
northstars10 wrote:God, I almost feel bad for Stillwater winning 13-1 because then all you get is a bunch of WBL and Hill people running their mouths like usual. Correct me if I'm wrong but didnt WBL only beat East Ridge 5-2?
Name one on this thread :?: Once again for all you challenged readers. WB is not WBL.

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 3:38 pm
by PoniesDad45
youngblood08 wrote:Cotter. shots were like 40-6.
Sounds like the guys with the big pads could have taken the night off.

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 6:28 pm
by ERMaverick
In fairness to the Raptors, they were playing without four regulars (including their leading goal scorer) and their starting goalie because of off-ice issues. They only dressed 14 skaters and, as has been bantered about on here numerous times, East Ridge isn't the deepest team to begin with.

Re.

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 6:55 pm
by HMHockey943
They scored 3 goals in 48 seconds, at the end of the 2nd

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 1:31 pm
by CEHockeydad
13 goals on 32 shots for Stillwater. The East Ridge goalie that played is not a J.V. goalie let alone a varsity goalie. I watched the game, The five kids suspended didn't seem to bothered by what was happening, sad state of affairs. This behavior of these five kids really hurt East Ridge. This game should of been around 4 - 1 at best. Too bad for the players that put it on the line for their school.

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 3:08 pm
by gophs16
youngblood08 wrote:Ranks right up there with some of your tough conference wins. Better say a few extra prayers, don't want history to repeat itself. You got Richfield coming up and we know what happened last year!!!!
No kidding. 4 of the 9 in the Classic couldn't skate with JV teams

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 3:14 pm
by wblhockeyfan8
northstars10 wrote:God, I almost feel bad for Stillwater winning 13-1 because then all you get is a bunch of WBL and Hill people running their mouths like usual. Correct me if I'm wrong but didnt WBL only beat East Ridge 5-2?
Strange... I don't see any of that. :|

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 3:53 pm
by PoniesDad45
CEHockeydad wrote:13 goals on 32 shots for Stillwater. The East Ridge goalie that played is not a J.V. goalie let alone a varsity goalie. I watched the game, The five kids suspended didn't seem to bothered by what was happening, sad state of affairs. This behavior of these five kids really hurt East Ridge. This game should of been around 4 - 1 at best. Too bad for the players that put it on the line for their school.
If it's the goalie I'm thinking about I'm shocked SW didn't score 20+

McDonough is suspended?

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 3:55 pm
by Just_Another_Fan
PoniesDad45 wrote:
CEHockeydad wrote:13 goals on 32 shots for Stillwater. The East Ridge goalie that played is not a J.V. goalie let alone a varsity goalie. I watched the game, The five kids suspended didn't seem to bothered by what was happening, sad state of affairs. This behavior of these five kids really hurt East Ridge. This game should of been around 4 - 1 at best. Too bad for the players that put it on the line for their school.
If it's the goalie I'm thinking about I'm shocked SW didn't score 20+

McDonough is suspended?
I believe so yes. He wasn't suited up at the game. Not even as a back up.