Page 13 of 15
Re: LDC and Marshall
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:15 pm
by sregit34
benny wrote:If you're not a Marshall player or fan why are you so angry? Any team can get lucky but in my more than 40 years of being involved in the game, once the teams get past the first round of playoffs, the teams that have the most depth, best defense, best shooters and good goaltending usually win. Neither Marshall or LDC have those combinations.
yeah your right lets just hand the section to new ulm. They are the number one seed, why waste time with a section tournament jus have new ulm play hutch. underdogs never win anyway right?
When the going gets tough, the tough get going. Do you think the 1980 olympic team was anything close in talent to the russians or anyone else in the world at that time? this years arizona cardinals, the giants in last years super bowl. how about hill murray over mighty roseau last year. And are you saying that they team that makes it to state from this section that may not be as skilled as some of the others should just forget it and not even try to compete because i think this section is better than given credit for.
Yeah your right lets just lay down and die.
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:33 am
by Koolice
sregit;
I don't agree with you much of the time but you are right. Thats why they play the games. You don't know who is going to win, a team may have more skill but that does not always mean they are going to win the game. I also believe a little hart goes a long way and just because you have skill doesn't mean you have hart. Lets play Hockey
LDC seeding
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 2:00 pm
by benny
sregit34 - we all know you are a Marshall player, past or present. Lets see how lucky Marshall is with Willmar. Willmar is a much stronger team and is seeded well ahead of Marshall. Yeh.. Marshall could get lucky and score a few goals. They may even be able to skate with them for a period but Willmar has more depth, better defense, more kids who can score and better goaltending.
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 3:02 pm
by golfer5
Hate to admit it but i agree with sregit34
Marshall warms up with Sleepy Eye who is having a year of just having fun.
Upsets Willmar 4-2
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:34 pm
by letsgowild
1st round predictions
luverne 4
worthington 3
marshall 8
sleepy eye 2
windom 7
fairmont 1
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:48 pm
by Ducks09
my predictions....
Marshall over Sleepy Eye--9-0
Luverne over Worthington--6-3
Windom over Fairmont--7-2
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:50 pm
by Ducks09
New Ulm vs. Willmar is my prections..
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:33 am
by Ducks09
How will Marshall deal with Willmar after going against slow Sleepy Eye?
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:29 pm
by Koolice
I don't see any upsets on Tues
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:23 pm
by letsgowild
any updates on tonights games
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 9:48 pm
by Bdangles14
Marshall beat Sleepy Eye 8-1
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:09 pm
by Top Shelf
Worthington 3 - Luverne 2
Marshall 8- Sleepy Eye 1
Windom 11- Fairmont 0
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:14 pm
by letsgowild
Top Shelf wrote:Worthington 3 - Luverne 2
Marshall 8- Sleepy Eye 1
Windom 11- Fairmont 0
thanks top shelf
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:23 pm
by letsgowild
Koolice wrote:I don't see any upsets on Tues
this might be an upset (worthington over luverne)
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:35 pm
by wild4hockey9
Wow windom with a big win...they previously beat fairmont 4-3 and 7-3
now 11-0...
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 5:21 pm
by Bdangles14
Any Predictions for the second round on thursday?
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:33 pm
by black_magic0
Marshall upsets Wilmar 5-4
Litch beats Red Wood 6-3
New Ulm.. and Hutch.. both Dominate both their Games
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:52 pm
by alkali_27
Thats a big win for Worthington too, after losing 3 times to Luverne this season all by pretty large margins (9-7, 7-1, and 8-2)
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:02 pm
by Bdangles14
I agree with black_magic
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:50 pm
by letsgowild
Bdangles14 wrote:Any Predictions for the second round on thursday?
litch-4 redwood-2
willmar-7 marshall-3
hutch-8 windom-1
new ulm-9 worthington-2
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:36 am
by Bdangles14
Litch 5-2 over redwood
Marshall over Willmar 3-2 with a huge upset
Hutch over Windom 8-0
New Ulm over Worthington 11-0
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:04 am
by golfer5
Snow I predict snow.
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:02 pm
by wild4hockey9
I see that all 3a games are posponed till tommorow.
i see that the marshall v. willmar game is at 330, and the others are at 7...
shouldnt they all be at the same time considering they all have to play the next day and you dont want to give any teams a unfair advantage?
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:15 am
by jpv
wild4hockey9 wrote:I see that all 3a games are posponed till tommorow.
i see that the marshall v. willmar game is at 330, and the others are at 7...
shouldnt they all be at the same time considering they all have to play the next day and you dont want to give any teams a unfair advantage?
Three and a half hours' advantage?
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:18 am
by whos_it
jpv wrote:wild4hockey9 wrote:I see that all 3a games are posponed till tommorow.
i see that the marshall v. willmar game is at 330, and the others are at 7...
shouldnt they all be at the same time considering they all have to play the next day and you dont want to give any teams a unfair advantage?
Three and a half hours' advantage?
Yes, they have been trying to schedule all 4 state tournament opening round games at the X at the same time as to not give anyone an unfair advantage for the next game but 8 teams and 12 officials on the ice at the same time were far to much for the X to handle so they had to favor a couple of the teams every year. Not fair, I know but it still seams to make for some enjoyable games. I think on a couple occasion, the team with the least rest has even pulled off the big upset.