The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
I thought you're reasoning for Jefferson being too high was that they were 0-2-1 going into Sections. And now they are a "hot" team?ubugme wrote:Cheap imitations of nickmons 1 & 2 bug me...nickmon3 wrote:U bug me!!!!!ubugme wrote:It bugs me I misspelled egad...
Rankings that inconsistently reward the "hot" teams bug me....
The logic is that they lost to Tonka, White Bear, and Duluth East in three games in a row. They then lost to Tonka again and went on to lose against Hill Murray. Except for playing Benilde, they lost every tough game they were in. To me, the 4 seed was very logical.HShockeywatcher wrote:What creampuff schedule? WITH their Missota games on their schedule they still have the 19th toughest schedule.
Apparently you don't read too well; as I always say, the blame goes both ways. Yes, I agree they should be playing. They don't need to play those teams; they need to play Burnsville/Jefferson. And Missota needs to let them out of their vise grip and play each team only once.
The only thing that screws AHA is their section's voting. I'd like to understand the logic of voting the team that tied the #1 seed to the #4 spot.
They didn't get screwed by the voting, and if they can't beat Edina what does it matter if they lose in the semi or the final?HShockeywatcher wrote:The only thing that screws AHA is their section's voting.
Understand this:HShockeywatcher wrote:I'd like to understand the logic of voting the team that tied the #1 seed to the #4 spot.
I remember calling you out for using single games to evaluate teams and you said you didn't do that, yet here you are again referring to one single game to assign seeding. The only people that should be banging their head are those that continue to read your posts.espnmobile8 wrote:The logic is that they lost to Tonka, White Bear, and Duluth East in three games in a row. They then lost to Tonka again and went on to lose against Hill Murray. Except for playing Benilde, they lost every tough game they were in. To me, the 4 seed was very logical.
I wasn't referring to Jefferson as the hot team, but Centennial...espnmobile8 wrote:I thought you're reasoning for Jefferson being too high was that they were 0-2-1 going into Sections. And now they are a "hot" team?ubugme wrote:Cheap imitations of nickmons 1 & 2 bug me...nickmon3 wrote: U bug me!!!!!
Rankings that inconsistently reward the "hot" teams bug me....
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall"){kind=small}