Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 1:05 pm
They actually had the better of the play early, before the referee's decided to hose them.wblhockguy06 wrote:haha thanks, was wbl leading at any point during the game?
HighSchoolHockeyForums.com
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
Suburban East Championship - WBL @ Roseville 2/15
Page 4 of 4
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 1:11 pm
They were down 4-0 at one point.wblhockguy06 wrote:haha thanks, was wbl leading at any point during the game?
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 1:16 pm
WBL never lead, due to the refs. 5-0 Roseville until the 3rd, then WB decided since the refs wern't going to let them play 5 on 5 they better score shorthanded. 4 short handed goals (1 penalty shot).
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 1:22 pm
Roseville does deserve the #1 seed, if they give it to Hill it is wrong. I'd like to say WBL should be higher, but probably 4th.
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 1:51 pm
Hartman had a hattrick for White Bear including scoring on a penalty shot.wblhockguy06 wrote:anyone got a box score?
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 2:09 pm
Is Hartman related to this woman?wbmd wrote:Hartman had a hattrick for White Bear including scoring on a penalty shot.wblhockguy06 wrote:anyone got a box score?
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 2:14 pm
figuring that Mary Hartman is almost ancient now, it must be his great-grandmaNeutron 14 wrote:Is Hartman related to this woman?wbmd wrote:Hartman had a hattrick for White Bear including scoring on a penalty shot.wblhockguy06 wrote:anyone got a box score?
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:15 pm
Let me just throw out a fact: Rose was shorthanded once, WBL was shorthanded 10+ times.
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:18 pm
Just goes to show that Roseville is a more disciplined team!WBLM wrote:Let me just throw out a fact: Rose was shorthanded once, WBL was shorthanded 10+ times.
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:22 pm
x
Re: Game
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:29 pm
I believe this guys opinion is unbiased. By the way WBMD if I hear about your preseason prediction for the Bears again I may hurl.HOCKEY SCOUT wrote:Roseville played an excellent game. Michael Dorr improved his stock immensely with a very smart and hard played game.
Reffing was among the worst I have seen in 35 years of scouting, I was hoping to see a great game and instead saw a pair of refferees decide the outcome in the first period. Hats off to roseville on being sec champs, hats off to WBL for fighting hard to overcome an obviously ridiculous situation.
powerplays on the night--roseville 9 total (2- 5-3's for over a minute and a half)
WB 1 total.
I don't care who you are rooting for wbl or roseville this was bad. The 2 refs should be out of the game.
I have scouted WBL quite a bit this year because we are watching Hanson pretty closely and I have seen this numerous times this year.
WBL is not a cheap team, there coaches seem to treat the ref's with respect during the game, anyone know more of a history on why they seem to get the short end of the stick quite a bit from the ref's.
Roseville should be the number 1 seed in this section over Hill because of their non-conference schedule from what I have seen and would have a great shot at a state title if they survive the section.
Re: Game
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:32 pm
Get ready to hurl - predicted 14-11; finished 15-10SEC Scotty wrote:By the way WBMD if I hear about your preseason prediction for the Bears again I may hurl.
Re: Game
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:40 pm
Wow another Nostradamus!wbmd wrote:Get ready to hurl - predicted 14-11; finished 15-10SEC Scotty wrote:By the way WBMD if I hear about your preseason prediction for the Bears again I may hurl.
Re: Game
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:53 pm
Great job, wbmd - you were only one game off. Tough to be that accurate in the pre-season. I would not wish to play the Bears in the post-season.SEC Scotty wrote:Wow another Nostradamus!wbmd wrote:Get ready to hurl - predicted 14-11; finished 15-10SEC Scotty wrote:By the way WBMD if I hear about your preseason prediction for the Bears again I may hurl.
Re: Game
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:59 pm
And I wouldn't want to play Stillwater either as they are definitely the darkhorse in the sections.AngusYoung wrote:Great job, wbmd - you were only one game off. Tough to be that accurate in the pre-season. I would not wish to play the Bears in the post-season.
Re: Game
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:57 pm
true dat, hopefully stillwater can ruin it for some better teams who think they can just walk past the ponieswbmd wrote:And I wouldn't want to playStillwater either as they are definitely the darkhorse in the sections.AngusYoung wrote:Great job, wbmd - you were only one game off. Tough to be that accurate in the pre-season. I would not wish to play the Bears in the post-season.