Page 1 of 1
10-YEAR HISTORY OF SECTIONS - seeds studied
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:06 pm
by O-townClown
1999-2008
10 years x 8 sections (AA) = 80
49 #1 seeds advanced (61.3%)
20 #2 seeds (25%)
7 #3 (8.8%)
3 #4 (3.8%, includes 12-11-2 Cloquet in 2008)
1 #5 in 2003 (Section V)
Re: 10-YEAR HISTORY OF SECTIONS - seeds studied
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 2:34 pm
by Lucia4President
O-townClown wrote:1999-2008
10 years x 8 sections (AA) = 80
49 #1 seeds advanced (61.3%)
20 #2 seeds (25%)
7 #3 (8.8%)
3 #4 (3.8%, includes 12-11-2 Cloquet in 2008)
1 #5 in 2003 (Section V)
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:01 pm
by The51
i dont see the 5 seed in 2003
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:28 pm
by Lucia4President
The51 wrote:i dont see the 5 seed in 2003
Section 1, Lakeville. I think he put section 5 by accident.
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:33 pm
by minnesotaice
blaine shouldnt have been seeded 3rd last year
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:46 pm
by HShockeywatcher
I will completely admit I stand corrected in not seeing the:
#5 seeded Lakeville team in 2003 (AA)
#4 seeded Hutchinson in 2000 (A)
#4 seeded Eastview in 2001 (AA)
#4 BSM in 2001 (A)
#5 Shakopee in 2005 (A)
in my thread:
http://www.ushsho.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=19047
The interesting points I thought were:
In AA, 4 finals match ups with a 5, 6, 7, or 8 seed.
In A, 2 finals match ups with a 5, 6, 7, or 8 seed.
In both classes, 37 1 v 2 finals match ups.
Despite the total of 2 non-top 4 winners, I maintain having the bottom seeds in the tournament is usually meaningless games for both teams.
thx
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:09 pm
by O-townClown
Thanks for catching my errors. I probably misread my own spreadsheet!
Update on #1s
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 11:05 pm
by O-townClown
Tartan, Woodbury, and Mayo out. Duluth East needed overtime.
Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 1:02 pm
by SEMNHOCKEYFAN
Where did you find these statistics? and are you going to remake one after this years sections?