Page 1 of 1

Cretin Durham Hall .vs. Park 12/12

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:58 pm
by puckster48
any thoughts?

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:02 pm
by HMHockey943
After Parks win over woodbury I think they will keep close, but Cretin will come up in the end.

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:53 am
by Gut22
HMHockey943 wrote:After Parks win over woodbury I think they will keep close, but Cretin will come up in the end.
that's exactly what people were saying befor we played woodbury.

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 1:25 am
by wblhockeyfan8
Gut22 wrote:
HMHockey943 wrote:After Parks win over woodbury I think they will keep close, but Cretin will come up in the end.
that's exactly what people were saying befor we played woodbury.
Not really< they were saying you'd get blown out. :lol:

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 10:11 am
by Hankya
The Woodbury game was a fluke. I'll take CDH over Park by 3. CDH still has one of their jr D out with a bad shoulder.

Re: Cretin Durham Hall .vs. Park 12/12

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 10:13 am
by hockeydad
puckster48 wrote:any thoughts?
I think you should spell the name of the school correctly when starting a thread - but that's just my thought.

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 10:36 am
by youngblood08
wblhockeyfan8 wrote:
Gut22 wrote:
HMHockey943 wrote:After Parks win over woodbury I think they will keep close, but Cretin will come up in the end.
that's exactly what people were saying befor we played woodbury.
Not really< they were saying you'd get blown out. :lol:

sort of like your prediction on the WBL-DE, boy WBL scorers really showed up there.

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:13 pm
by wblhockeyfan8
youngblood08 wrote:
wblhockeyfan8 wrote:
Gut22 wrote: that's exactly what people were saying befor we played woodbury.
Not really< they were saying you'd get blown out. :lol:

sort of like your prediction on the WBL-DE, boy WBL scorers really showed up there.
This post doesn't really make sense, what is this comment even relating too?
Cause I definitely haven't made any predictions on this thread.

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 7:28 pm
by InYourFace09
Gut22 wrote:
HMHockey943 wrote:After Parks win over woodbury I think they will keep close, but Cretin will come up in the end.
that's exactly what people were saying befor we played woodbury.
You think you would come up with a better name then Gut22, being that is part of your last name. Like we don't know who you are.

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 7:36 pm
by wblhockeyfan8
InYourFace09 wrote:
Gut22 wrote:
HMHockey943 wrote:After Parks win over woodbury I think they will keep close, but Cretin will come up in the end.
that's exactly what people were saying befor we played woodbury.
You think you would come up with a better name then Gut22, being that is part of your last name. Like we don't know who you are.
Well number 26 from Park made an account to make his statement about the Woodbury injury and I think we joined him. I Don't think he cares if you know who he is.

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 10:55 pm
by puckster48
Hankya wrote:The Woodbury game was a fluke. I'll take CDH over Park by 3. CDH still has one of their jr D out with a bad shoulder.
Well if it was beating Woodbury was a fluke then how come Park contended with Cretin? Maybe they are just a little better than you give them credit for.

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 11:39 pm
by wblhockeyfan8
puckster48 wrote:
Hankya wrote:The Woodbury game was a fluke. I'll take CDH over Park by 3. CDH still has one of their jr D out with a bad shoulder.
Well if it was beating Woodbury was a fluke then how come Park contended with Cretin? Maybe they are just a little better than you give them credit for.
Scores?

Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 12:09 am
by karl(east)
wblhockeyfan8 wrote:
puckster48 wrote:
Hankya wrote:The Woodbury game was a fluke. I'll take CDH over Park by 3. CDH still has one of their jr D out with a bad shoulder.
Well if it was beating Woodbury was a fluke then how come Park contended with Cretin? Maybe they are just a little better than you give them credit for.
Scores?
Cretin won 3-2.

Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 10:02 am
by 20rocks
Park played an awesome home opening game last night. Cretins Goalie was just phenomenal and kept them in the game. Park had a goal in the last few minutes of the game that was called off by the refs. Said it hit the pipe, when it clearly hit the net and came back out. Refs really weren't calling much near the end and Cretin started playing a little dirty. Kudos to both teams. It was a great show!

Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 10:39 am
by Hankya
CDH won the game. Need I say more. Sorry puckster48, just the facts. Yes, it was a fluke.

Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 12:55 pm
by 20rocks
Sorry there Hankya. I'm guessing you weren't at the game. Park put on quite the show against Cretin. Yes, Cretin ended up winning. Park made them work for that win down to the very last second of the game. This game very easily could've gone either way. Don't under estimate Park this year! These kids and coaches are determined to make a mark!

Sorry to tell you this but, it wasn't a fluke that Park Beat Woodbury. They just happened to be the better team that night! They had a great game.

Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 1:25 pm
by BigShow
Settle down 20rocksinyourhead, think it's any coincidence you scored 3 of the goals after the Royals lost a teammate?? yes, you won but come on.

Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 1:34 pm
by 20rocks
Sorry you got that wrong BIGSHOW. I'm not a player! 20 happens to be my favorite number and one that Parks 20 is doing pretty well playing in. Parks 20 had a goal scored b-4 Christain unfortunately went out hurt. Don't make assumptions! The injury was a nonfactor on the play of this kid. Other then the fact that he and his team mates were very saddened to see a fellow player leaving on a stretcher.

Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 1:39 pm
by PowerForward25
20rocks wrote:Sorry you got that wrong BIGSHOW. I'm not a player! 20 happens to be my favorite number and one that Parks 20 is doing pretty well playing in. Parks 20 had a goal scored b-4 Christain unfortunately went out hurt. Don't make assumptions! The injury was a nonfactor on the play of this kid. Other then the fact that he and his team mates were very saddened to see a fellow player leaving on a stretcher.
I have to agree. The royals weren't playing too well before or after. You would think that after he was taken off the ice, woodbury would pick it up and play for him like they did last night. That didn't happen. The better team on that particular night won. Park showed up to play. Woodbury didn't.

Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 2:02 pm
by Hankya
Fluke or not, what matters is the final score. I get a kick out of all the discussion of how close games are. This team should have wont he game, this team got screwed, this kid didnt get enough ice, the refs messed up etc. Bottom line is the W. I am glad to see Park making a name for themselves and I am not putting them down. What matters is who wins.

Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 2:09 pm
by 20rocks
Man Hockey gets ugly on and off the ice :evil:

Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 2:24 pm
by 20rocks
Not the parent of #20 either there BigShow! What's with you having such animosity towards this kid and his family. Did they do something to you? Obvious hockey parent yourself. They say hockey parents are some of the ugliest people. You're proving that right.

Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 3:08 pm
by wblhockeyfan8
Well this thread is clearly on-topic. :roll:

Probably needs to be locked.

Cretin wins, Park loses. The SEC rolls on.