Cretin Durham Hall .vs. Park 12/12

puckster48 · Post by **puckster48** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:58 pm

any thoughts?

HMHockey943 · Post by **HMHockey943** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:02 pm

After Parks win over woodbury I think they will keep close, but Cretin will come up in the end.

Gut22 · Post by **Gut22** » Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:53 am

HMHockey943 wrote:After Parks win over woodbury I think they will keep close, but Cretin will come up in the end.

that's exactly what people were saying befor we played woodbury.

wblhockeyfan8 · Post by **wblhockeyfan8** » Sat Dec 12, 2009 1:25 am

Gut22 wrote:
HMHockey943 wrote:After Parks win over woodbury I think they will keep close, but Cretin will come up in the end.
that's exactly what people were saying befor we played woodbury.

Not really< they were saying you'd get blown out.

Hankya · Post by **Hankya** » Sat Dec 12, 2009 10:11 am

The Woodbury game was a fluke. I'll take CDH over Park by 3. CDH still has one of their jr D out with a bad shoulder.

hockeydad · Post by **hockeydad** » Sat Dec 12, 2009 10:13 am

puckster48 wrote:any thoughts?

I think you should spell the name of the school correctly when starting a thread - but that's just my thought.

youngblood08 · Post by **youngblood08** » Sat Dec 12, 2009 10:36 am

wblhockeyfan8 wrote:
Gut22 wrote:
HMHockey943 wrote:After Parks win over woodbury I think they will keep close, but Cretin will come up in the end.
that's exactly what people were saying befor we played woodbury.
Not really< they were saying you'd get blown out.

sort of like your prediction on the WBL-DE, boy WBL scorers really showed up there.

wblhockeyfan8 · Post by **wblhockeyfan8** » Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:13 pm

youngblood08 wrote:
wblhockeyfan8 wrote:
Gut22 wrote: that's exactly what people were saying befor we played woodbury.
Not really< they were saying you'd get blown out.

sort of like your prediction on the WBL-DE, boy WBL scorers really showed up there.

This post doesn't really make sense, what is this comment even relating too?
Cause I definitely haven't made any predictions on this thread.

InYourFace09 · Post by **InYourFace09** » Sat Dec 12, 2009 7:28 pm

Gut22 wrote:
HMHockey943 wrote:After Parks win over woodbury I think they will keep close, but Cretin will come up in the end.
that's exactly what people were saying befor we played woodbury.

You think you would come up with a better name then Gut22, being that is part of your last name. Like we don't know who you are.

wblhockeyfan8 · Post by **wblhockeyfan8** » Sat Dec 12, 2009 7:36 pm

InYourFace09 wrote:
Gut22 wrote:
HMHockey943 wrote:After Parks win over woodbury I think they will keep close, but Cretin will come up in the end.
that's exactly what people were saying befor we played woodbury.
You think you would come up with a better name then Gut22, being that is part of your last name. Like we don't know who you are.

Well number 26 from Park made an account to make his statement about the Woodbury injury and I think we joined him. I Don't think he cares if you know who he is.

puckster48 · Post by **puckster48** » Sat Dec 12, 2009 10:55 pm

Hankya wrote:The Woodbury game was a fluke. I'll take CDH over Park by 3. CDH still has one of their jr D out with a bad shoulder.

Well if it was beating Woodbury was a fluke then how come Park contended with Cretin? Maybe they are just a little better than you give them credit for.

wblhockeyfan8 · Post by **wblhockeyfan8** » Sat Dec 12, 2009 11:39 pm

puckster48 wrote:
Hankya wrote:The Woodbury game was a fluke. I'll take CDH over Park by 3. CDH still has one of their jr D out with a bad shoulder.
Well if it was beating Woodbury was a fluke then how come Park contended with Cretin? Maybe they are just a little better than you give them credit for.

Scores?

Post by **karl(east)** » Sun Dec 13, 2009 12:09 am

wblhockeyfan8 wrote:
puckster48 wrote:
Hankya wrote:The Woodbury game was a fluke. I'll take CDH over Park by 3. CDH still has one of their jr D out with a bad shoulder.
Well if it was beating Woodbury was a fluke then how come Park contended with Cretin? Maybe they are just a little better than you give them credit for.
Scores?

Cretin won 3-2.

20rocks · Post by **20rocks** » Sun Dec 13, 2009 10:02 am

Park played an awesome home opening game last night. Cretins Goalie was just phenomenal and kept them in the game. Park had a goal in the last few minutes of the game that was called off by the refs. Said it hit the pipe, when it clearly hit the net and came back out. Refs really weren't calling much near the end and Cretin started playing a little dirty. Kudos to both teams. It was a great show!

Hankya · Post by **Hankya** » Sun Dec 13, 2009 10:39 am

CDH won the game. Need I say more. Sorry puckster48, just the facts. Yes, it was a fluke.

20rocks · Post by **20rocks** » Sun Dec 13, 2009 12:55 pm

Sorry there Hankya. I'm guessing you weren't at the game. Park put on quite the show against Cretin. Yes, Cretin ended up winning. Park made them work for that win down to the very last second of the game. This game very easily could've gone either way. Don't under estimate Park this year! These kids and coaches are determined to make a mark!

Sorry to tell you this but, it wasn't a fluke that Park Beat Woodbury. They just happened to be the better team that night! They had a great game.

BigShow · Post by **BigShow** » Sun Dec 13, 2009 1:25 pm

Settle down 20rocksinyourhead, think it's any coincidence you scored 3 of the goals after the Royals lost a teammate?? yes, you won but come on.

20rocks · Post by **20rocks** » Sun Dec 13, 2009 1:34 pm

Sorry you got that wrong BIGSHOW. I'm not a player! 20 happens to be my favorite number and one that Parks 20 is doing pretty well playing in. Parks 20 had a goal scored b-4 Christain unfortunately went out hurt. Don't make assumptions! The injury was a nonfactor on the play of this kid. Other then the fact that he and his team mates were very saddened to see a fellow player leaving on a stretcher.

PowerForward25 · Post by **PowerForward25** » Sun Dec 13, 2009 1:39 pm

20rocks wrote:Sorry you got that wrong BIGSHOW. I'm not a player! 20 happens to be my favorite number and one that Parks 20 is doing pretty well playing in. Parks 20 had a goal scored b-4 Christain unfortunately went out hurt. Don't make assumptions! The injury was a nonfactor on the play of this kid. Other then the fact that he and his team mates were very saddened to see a fellow player leaving on a stretcher.

I have to agree. The royals weren't playing too well before or after. You would think that after he was taken off the ice, woodbury would pick it up and play for him like they did last night. That didn't happen. The better team on that particular night won. Park showed up to play. Woodbury didn't.

Hankya · Post by **Hankya** » Sun Dec 13, 2009 2:02 pm

Fluke or not, what matters is the final score. I get a kick out of all the discussion of how close games are. This team should have wont he game, this team got screwed, this kid didnt get enough ice, the refs messed up etc. Bottom line is the W. I am glad to see Park making a name for themselves and I am not putting them down. What matters is who wins.

20rocks · Post by **20rocks** » Sun Dec 13, 2009 2:09 pm

Man Hockey gets ugly on and off the ice

20rocks · Post by **20rocks** » Sun Dec 13, 2009 2:24 pm

Not the parent of #20 either there BigShow! What's with you having such animosity towards this kid and his family. Did they do something to you? Obvious hockey parent yourself. They say hockey parents are some of the ugliest people. You're proving that right.

wblhockeyfan8 · Post by **wblhockeyfan8** » Sun Dec 13, 2009 3:08 pm

Well this thread is clearly on-topic.

Probably needs to be locked.

Cretin wins, Park loses. The SEC rolls on.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Cretin Durham Hall .vs. Park 12/12

Cretin Durham Hall .vs. Park 12/12

Re: Cretin Durham Hall .vs. Park 12/12