Page 1 of 2

MN HOCKEY HUB

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 8:15 am
by OTB987
The Minnesota Hockey Hub has gone through some changes and wanted to get a sense as to who likes better now OR wishes it would go back to the way it was.

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 8:21 am
by MNHockeyFan
The thing I like most about it now is that when you click on a result it goes right to the box score, skipping the silly graphics page that first appeared last season.

The thing I like least about it now is that they dropped the records and stats for past seasons. This seems to only affect the girls Hub and I understand they are working on it to restore this information. But it's been over a month now and for the most part the prior info is still not showing up.

Sections

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:26 am
by Skip_per
The only addition they need to add is the Section Standings. They have everything else. It would just be nice to see the Section line ups with the results. People do like to see this. Thanks

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:29 am
by TheHockeyDJ
Section Standings don't make sense though, especially in 7AA where teams don't play the same opponents or number of section opponents. Now, having a section rankings makes more sense where you rank each section based on how you think the coaches would vote at the end of the season.

Re: MN HOCKEY HUB

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:56 am
by almostashappy
OTB987 wrote:The Minnesota Hockey Hub has gone through some changes and wanted to get a sense as to who likes better now OR wishes it would go back to the way it was.
Two weeks into the season, and no spotlight games. HubTV and "The Full Nelson" sections last updated in March. It's gone from creating content to aggregating content created elsewhere. Real shame that it looks like the old business model wasn't viable (despite the fact that I gave them two or three thousand of my "eye balls" over the last few years).

But maybe I'm writing the obituary too soon? Please, Loren...tell us that the old hub isn't dead, and that it's just resting (or even pining for the fjords).

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:18 am
by Shinbone_News
Pointless redesign hiding the discontinuation of original content. Cool to have direct access to the other hub sites, though, I like that.

And who knew they were commissioning so many original stories over at the Coach's Association? Good stuff over there, I can just bookmark it directly.

Except for some minor navigational improvements, my vote is definitely no. And I suspect it's directly connected to le$$ commitment from the owner$.

Loren, say it ain't so???

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:34 am
by Nuts&Bolts
It's terrible. Poor content compared to last year and I don't need to see stories featured from back in June. The bar for scores at the top still is flawed skipping over a game on the far end of the banner when you click to scroll left or right. Finally the data is often delayed or flat out wrong. Remember the Blaine v Roseau score being doubled and I've also seen a couple of power plays in a game being above 100% (team was 3 for 2 on the PP). Hopefully they get this figured out.

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:36 am
by east hockey
Nuts&Bolts wrote:It's terrible. Poor content compared to last year and I don't need to see stories featured from back in June. The bar for scores at the top still is flawed skipping over a game on the far end of the banner when you click to scroll left or right. Finally the data is often delayed or flat out wrong. Remember the Blaine v Roseau score being doubled and I've also seen a couple of power plays in a game being above 100% (team was 3 for 2 on the PP). Hopefully they get this figured out.
Not to mention Edina's five shorthanded goals in one game. :mrgreen:

Lee

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:35 pm
by barry_mcconnell
The colors and layout are a bit worse now compared to the old site. But its the content quality and quantity that has really dropped off.

I'm guessing the money and/or interest fell off for some of the key players.

Re: MN HOCKEY HUB

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 2:47 pm
by gitter
almostashappy wrote:It's gone from creating content to aggregating content created elsewhere.
This. I can look at local content on their respective sites without the use of the Hockey Hub. I'm looking for original content that can't be found elsewhere. I really enjoyed reading game recaps and video, now it's to the point that I'll just look at scores and leave the website.

Re: MN HOCKEY HUB

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:03 pm
by SuperStar
gitter wrote:
almostashappy wrote:It's gone from creating content to aggregating content created elsewhere.
This. I can look at local content on their respective sites without the use of the Hockey Hub. I'm looking for original content that can't be found elsewhere. I really enjoyed reading game recaps and video, now it's to the point that I'll just look at scores and leave the website.
I agree..

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:09 pm
by JoltDelivered
On a somewhat different note; Maybe it's just my computer(s) but it seems like a very slow-to-load webpage. Sometimes it doesn't even finish loading...just kinda freezes. Seeing that this happens on multiple diffferent computers I was thinking the webpage was just memory-heavy.

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:04 pm
by hockeyfan893
My thoughts - and apparently everyone else's thoughts as well - on the new Hockey Hub

Image

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:32 pm
by kniven
barry_mcconnell wrote:The colors and layout are a bit worse now compared to the old site. But its the content quality and quantity that has really dropped off.

I'm guessing the money and/or interest fell off for some of the key players.
I liked the old format much, much better.

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:01 pm
by Sats81
Seems like it takes forever to load as well.

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:12 pm
by sanryam
New Hub sucks.

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:41 pm
by hshockeyfan8
Wasn't too frustrated with it until just now, when I saw that Benilde allegedly beat Mounds View 22-10. Rough night for the goalies?

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:59 pm
by 57special
It's now down to 18-6. Roo scored 3 goals in 7 seconds, apparently.

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:11 pm
by MNHockeyFan
57special wrote:It's now down to 18-6. Roo scored 3 goals in 7 seconds, apparently.
Wow, that's incredible. Roo must be really fast, eh? :wink:

Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 7:54 am
by C-dad
MNHockeyFan wrote:
57special wrote:It's now down to 18-6. Roo scored 3 goals in 7 seconds, apparently.
Wow, that's incredible. Roo must be really fast, eh? :wink:
He is quick! :lol:

Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 8:48 am
by barry_mcconnell
Can we talk about how much the site sucks in mobiles browsers? View Full Site doesn't work at all. So much suck!

Don't even get me started on that iPhone app.

Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 9:03 am
by Nuts&Bolts
Any update on the HF vs STA game? Hub has shown 13:00 minutes remaining in the 1st period since about 10 last night yet no updates all night long on the HM game. Oh wait a minute the HF vs STA game is actually tonight. Nice job from the largest news media outlet in the state of hockey.

Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:44 am
by 57special
MNHockeyFan wrote:
57special wrote:It's now down to 18-6. Roo scored 3 goals in 7 seconds, apparently.
Wow, that's incredible. Roo must be really fast, eh? :wink:
even more incredible, two of his goals were scored a second apart!

Beat the old NHL record set by Nels Stewart which was 4 seconds.

Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 12:13 pm
by observer
Nice job from the largest news media outlet in the state of hockey.
Talk to your team representatives. Your team's coaches and helpers are the ones responsible for accurate entry. The StarTribune only supplies the platform.

I agree that the old site was better designed and only needed a few tweaks instead of a total redo.

Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 7:25 pm
by northwoods oldtimer
Anything run by "Red Star" Tribune involving hockey is half baked effort. The old site really drove quality standards for coverage and made high school hockey exciting to follow. It was excellent, any and all teams one was interested in could be accessed. The boys knocked it out of the park and the replacement is pure second rate. I guess the saying "you get what you paid for" applies. Advertising dollars that can support the effort come and go, to our collective loss of a great site.